U.S. Court of International Trade

Rule Changes

Overseeing the refund process and expanding eligibility

The U.S. government has never had to give back $166 billion it collected illegally — until now. On April 20, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the CAPE (Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries) portal for importers to reclaim tariff payments that the Supreme Court ruled the president had no authority to collect. The first phase covers $127 billion across more than 56,000 registered importers. But the launch was rocky: the system displayed 'high volume' errors within hours of going live, with some users encountering duplicate Tax ID errors and others spending hours on hold trying to resolve account access issues before they could even file a claim. Trade attorneys warned that technical glitches are not merely annoyances — delays can cause importers to lose refund rights permanently.

Updated Apr 21

Rule Changes

Processing 700+ importer refund lawsuits while awaiting Supreme Court ruling

President Trump declared national emergencies over fentanyl trafficking and trade deficits, then used a 1977 law never intended for tariffs to slap duties on nearly every country. Federal courts at every level said he exceeded his authority. The tariffs stayed anyway, collecting approximately $150 billion while 301,000 importers waited to see if they'd get refunds. The Supreme Court heard arguments in November 2025, with justices expressing deep skepticism about the government's position, but has yet to issue a ruling as of late January 2026.

Updated Jan 21

Rule Changes

Implementing new procedural rules amid landmark tariff litigation

A small wine importer and a toy company are forcing the Supreme Court to answer a question that could redefine presidential power: Can the president slap tariffs on the entire world without Congress? Trump used emergency powers law to impose tariffs collecting $130 billion, courts said he overstepped, and now the justices will decide if emergency powers mean what they've always meant—or something radically new.

Updated Jan 5