Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
Henna Virkkunen

Henna Virkkunen

EU Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy

Appears in 2 stories

Notable Quotes

“With the DSA’s first non‑compliance decision, we are holding X responsible for undermining users’ rights and evading accountability.” ([europeaninterest.eu](https://www.europeaninterest.eu/digital-services-act-commission-fines-x-for-violating-transparency-obligations/?utm_source=openai))

“Compliance prevents fines. The DSA protects users — deceiving users with blue checkmarks, obscuring information on ads and shutting out researchers have no place online in the EU.” ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/eu-fines-x-140-mln-breaching-online-content-rules-tiktok-settles-with-2025-12-05/?utm_source=openai))

Virkkunen said the EU’s first DSA non‑compliance decision is about ‘holding X responsible for undermining users’ rights and evading accountability,’ not censoring speech. ([europeaninterest.eu](https://www.europeaninterest.eu/digital-services-act-commission-fines-x-for-violating-transparency-obligations/?utm_source=openai))

Stories

Europe’s big tech crackdown under the DSA and DMA

Rule Changes

Overseeing DSA enforcement and first non‑compliance decision against X

The European Union is cracking down on U.S.-based Big Tech using the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, and long-standing competition and privacy rules. Since 2023, Brussels designated six platforms as 'gatekeepers,' imposed obligations on core services, and opened proceedings against X, Google, Apple and Meta for monopolistic conduct, opaque algorithms, deceptive design, and failures to police harmful content.

Updated 6 days ago

EU’s first digital Services Act crackdown on X

Rule Changes

Lead political face of DSA enforcement against X

On December 5, 2025, the European Commission issued its first non‑compliance decision under the Digital Services Act, fining X €120 million for misleading users with paid blue checkmarks, failing to provide a transparent advertising repository, and obstructing researcher access to public data. Regulators concluded the subscription-based 'verified' badge is deceptive because anyone can buy it without meaningful identity checks, and the platform's ad library and data-access rules prevent independent scrutiny of scams, influence operations, and systemic online risks.

Updated 7 days ago