Margrethe Vestager

Executive Vice President, European Commission - Leading EU antitrust enforcement against Apple

Apple controls what apps you can install, what features they can offer, and how much they cost. On January 8, 2026, the Ninth Circuit ruled that's perfectly legal—at least when it comes to shutting out a competitor's heart monitoring app. The decision caps a five-year battle with medical device maker AliveCor, which claimed Apple killed its SmartRhythm app by changing the Apple Watch heart rate algorithm in 2018. Judge Michelle Friedland held that Apple had no obligation to share its technology with rivals, invoking the rarely-successful refusal-to-deal defense. The same day, India doubled down on its right to impose antitrust penalties based on Apple's $380 billion global revenue—not just its Indian earnings—putting the company at risk of a $38 billion fine.

Updated Jan 8

Former Executive Vice-President for a Europe Fit for the Digital Age; Competition and Digital Policy Leader - Shaped early DSA enforcement theory applied in the X case

On December 5, 2025, the European Commission issued its first-ever non‑compliance decision under the Digital Services Act (DSA), fining Elon Musk’s social platform X €120 million for misleading users with its paid blue checkmark system, failing to provide a transparent advertising repository, and obstructing researcher access to public data. Regulators concluded that X’s subscription-based ‘verified’ badge constitutes deceptive design because anyone can buy it without meaningful identity checks, while the platform’s ad library and data-access rules prevent independent scrutiny of scams, influence operations, and systemic online risks.

Updated Dec 11, 2025