White v. Massachusetts Council (1983)
Boston required that half the workers on city-funded construction projects be city residents. A group of contractors challenged the rule as an unconstitutional burden on interstate commerce.
The Supreme Court upheld the requirement, ruling the city could attach residency conditions to projects it funded.
The decision became the legal foundation for local hiring preferences on city-funded work across the country.
Austin's resolution rests on the same logic: a city steering its own contract dollars toward its own residents. Whether it holds depends on how the preference is written into procurement and what state law allows.
