Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why
UD

U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division

Federal Agency

Appears in 3 stories

Stories

US merger notification thresholds rise amid regulatory turbulence

Rule Changes

The DOJ division responsible for enforcing federal antitrust laws, sharing merger review duties with the FTC. - Joint merger review authority with FTC

The United States raised the minimum deal size requiring federal antitrust review to $133.9 million on February 15, 2026—up from $126.4 million the previous year. Companies planning mergers or acquisitions above this threshold must now file premerger notifications with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) and wait for government clearance before closing their deals.

Updated Feb 16

Google search monopoly case enters appeals phase

Rule Changes

The DOJ Antitrust Division enforces federal antitrust laws and brought the original complaint against Google in October 2020. - Lead plaintiff; appealing for Chrome divestiture

Google has paid Apple roughly $20 billion per year to be the default search engine on iPhones and Safari. In August 2024, a federal judge ruled this arrangement—and similar deals with Samsung and others—constituted an illegal monopoly. Now both sides are appealing: the Department of Justice wants Google broken up, while Google wants the entire case thrown out.

Updated Feb 11

Apple's platform control on trial

Rule Changes

Federal agency enforcing antitrust laws to promote competition and prevent monopolies. - Prosecuting monopolization case against Apple, survived motion to dismiss

Apple controls what apps you can install, what features they can offer, and how much they cost. On January 8, 2026, the Ninth Circuit ruled that's perfectly legal—at least when it comes to shutting out a competitor's heart monitoring app. The decision caps a five-year battle with medical device maker AliveCor, which claimed Apple killed its SmartRhythm app by changing the Apple Watch heart rate algorithm in 2018. Judge Michelle Friedland held that Apple had no obligation to share its technology with rivals, invoking the rarely-successful refusal-to-deal defense. The same day, India doubled down on its right to impose antitrust penalties based on Apple's $380 billion global revenue—not just its Indian earnings—putting the company at risk of a $38 billion fine.

Updated Jan 8