Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
Ketanji Brown Jackson

Ketanji Brown Jackson

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

Appears in 5 stories

Born: September 14, 1970 (age 55 years), Washington, D.C.
Spouse: Patrick G. Jackson (m. 1996)
Previous offices: Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (2021–2022) and Vice Chair of the United States Sentencing Commission (2010–2014)
Parents: Ellery Brown and Johnny Brown
Education: Miami Palmetto Senior High School, Harvard University, and Harvard Law School

Notable Quotes

Prisoners like Landor who suffer violations of their religious freedom in state prisons — no matter how blatant — will often be left remediless.

"The majority assumes for itself the prerogative to foreclose contract-rescission suits that Congress intended to authorize."

Under federal law, no such thing is required. The federal law says that the action commences by filing a complaint with the court.

Stories

Supreme Court bars damages suits against prison officials under religious-rights law

Rule Changes

Dissented, joined by Sotomayor and Kagan

Three weeks before his release, Louisiana prison guards handcuffed Damon Landor to a chair and shaved off the dreadlocks he had grown for nearly 20 years. He had handed them a court ruling saying his faith protected his hair. A guard threw it in the trash.

Updated Jun 23

Supreme Court bars private lawsuits under the 1940 mutual fund law

Rule Changes

Dissented, joined by Sotomayor in full and Kagan in part

For decades, investors could sue a mutual fund directly to undo contracts that broke federal fund law. On June 11, 2026, the Supreme Court closed that door. By a 6-3 vote, the justices ruled that ordinary investors have no right to sue under the Investment Company Act of 1940, the law that governs mutual funds and similar pooled investments.

Updated Jun 11

Federal rules trump state malpractice barriers

Rule Changes

Filed concurrence in judgment

For decades, more than half of U.S. states required injured patients to obtain expert affidavits before filing medical malpractice lawsuits—a screening mechanism designed to filter frivolous claims. On January 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that these state requirements don't apply when patients sue in federal court.

Updated May 22

Supreme Court opens prison gates wider for federal inmates

Rule Changes

Filed concurring opinion in Bowe v. United States

The Supreme Court just handed federal prisoners a major win, ruling 5-4 that they can challenge their convictions repeatedly—something most courts have blocked for decades. Michael Bowe, serving 24 years for armed robbery, asked to revisit his case based on new legal precedent. The Eleventh Circuit said no. On January 9, 2026, the Supreme Court said yes, declaring that a key provision of the 1996 anti-terrorism law applies only to state prisoners, not federal inmates.

Updated May 20

Trump’s unitary-executive showdown with independent agencies

Rule Changes

Liberal justice emphasizing historical practice and congressional design of independent agencies

In 2025, President Donald Trump challenged the 1935 Humphrey's Executor precedent by firing and removing independent agency officials before their terms expired.

Updated May 10