Pull to refresh
Logo
Grand Rapids residents challenge Acrisure Amphitheater's noise exemption

Grand Rapids residents challenge Acrisure Amphitheater's noise exemption

Rule Changes Grand Rapids, MI local

Judge ordered Acrisure Amphitheater to comply with the noise ordinance; the city is moving to restore the venue's exemption

September 24th, 2026: Resident launches noise-tracking website

Overview

Updated 5 days ago

Concert bass from Grand Rapids' riverfront amphitheater has drifted through west-side windows since May. On Aug. 21, a judge ordered the venue to comply with the city's noise ordinance, siding with three Plaza Tower condo owners who sued.

The city is now moving to undo that ruling. Its commission will vote Oct. 27 on an amendment that keeps the venue exempt from noise limits between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m. Residents who won the case call it a bid to change the law after losing it.

Why it matters

The city is moving to amend its noise code so the amphitheater stays exempt. That would erase the residents' court victory.

Monday: what changed in Grand Rapids, MI

One short email a week with the openings, closings, permits and council votes we covered. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

40 dB
Sound above allowed limit
Residents' sound expert measured levels 40 decibels above the city's noise ordinance limit.
3
Condo owners who sued
Three Plaza Tower condo owners filed the lawsuit that led to the court ruling.
4 km
Distance where bass remains audible
A resident 2.5 miles from the venue reports hearing bass and lyrics through windows.
74%
Support for a sound wall
Grand Rapids voters who back building a sound wall to reduce amphitheater noise, per a Practical Polling Insights survey of 300 registered voters.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

May 2026 September 2026

8 events Latest: September 24th, 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Resident launches noise-tracking website

    Latest Community Action

    Adam Fuller's Survey of Sound lets residents log what they hear during concerts; he plans to present the data to City Hall.

  2. Amphitheater nominated for national award

    Recognition

    The International Entertainment Buyers Association nominated Acrisure for National Amphitheater of the Year. A Practical Polling Insights survey of 300 voters found 74% support a sound wall.

  3. City manager declines to recommend noise exception

    Statement

    WGVU reports City Manager Mark Washington has not recommended a noise exception for the amphitheater, despite having authority under the ordinance.

  4. Commissioner acknowledges issue

    Statement

    First Ward Commissioner AliciaMarie Belchak says the city will monitor and address the amphitheater's noise impact.

  5. Concert runs past 11 PM curfew

    Violation

    A recent show extends beyond the 11 PM curfew under a city-allowed performance delay exception.

  6. Resident notices concert noise through windows

    Complaint Origin

    Laure Turmell, living 2-3 miles from the amphitheater, first hears bass and lyrics from concerts through her windows at night.

Scenarios

1

City sets decibel limits for the amphitheater

Possible Resolves by End of 2026

Discussed by: Complaining residents Laure Turmell and Michael Yoder, who explicitly requested enforceable decibel limits and independent sound monitoring in their filings.

The City Commission reviews the noise exemption, amends the ordinance to set decibel limits, and arranges independent sound monitoring. This is the outcome residents asked for and would require a formal commission vote on the code.

2

Amphitheater adds voluntary sound mitigation

Possible Resolves by Q3 2026

Discussed by: City spokesperson, who said staff is working with operators to 'monitor sound levels, evaluate future options, and support a positive experience for both nearby residents and visitors.'

Rather than wait for regulatory action, venue operators add sound barriers, adjust speaker angles, or impose bass cutoffs. This reduces audible noise without an ordinance change and could satisfy residents enough to drop further complaints.

3

Residents escalate to legal action over noise

Unlikely Resolves by Q2 2027

Discussed by: Turmell's expectation of more complaints if nothing changes; a standard escalation path when municipalities decline to act on nuisance claims.

If the commission declines to set limits, residents could sue the city over the exemption or pursue a private nuisance claim against the venue operator. Legal action would prolong the dispute and could cost the city in defense fees or damages.

4

City rewrites noise ordinance to accommodate amphitheater

Possible Resolves by End of 2026

Discussed by: Hal Froot, lead plaintiff, who told WGVU he worries the city will change the ordinance

After the court ordered the venue to comply with the noise ordinance, the City Commission could amend the code to relax limits for the amphitheater. This would bring the venue into compliance without reducing sound. Residents would lose the court victory.

5

City approves a sound wall for the amphitheater

Possible Resolves by Q2 2027

Discussed by: Practical Polling Insights survey of 300 Grand Rapids registered voters

The city could build a sound wall to cut noise reaching Plaza Towers and other neighborhoods. The poll found 74% support for such a wall. A wall would not require changing the noise ordinance and could resolve the dispute without further litigation.

6

City Commission votes to keep the amphitheater's noise exemption

Possible Resolves by Oct 27, 2026

Discussed by: Deputy City Manager Kate Berens, whose memo to commissioners proposed the amendment; Hal Froot, who called it a bid to change the law after losing the case

The commission will vote Oct. 27 on an amendment that keeps the amphitheater exempt from the noise code between 7 a.m. and 11 p.m. If it passes, the venue keeps its special land-use permit with no decibel limits, and residents lose the court victory they won in August. If it fails, the venue must comply with the ordinance's 55-62 decibel limits.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

1990s-2000s

Red Rocks Amphitheatre noise disputes (Morrison, Colorado)

Residents of Morrison, Colorado, about a mile from the iconic Red Rocks Amphitheatre, lodged hundreds of noise complaints as concert volume rose through the 1990s. The town council passed curfews and decibel restrictions, and Denver, which owns the venue, sued over local jurisdiction.

Then

Courts forced the two governments to negotiate a formal sound limits agreement.

Now

Red Rocks now operates under strict measured decibel limits, with an on-site sound engineer and fines for violations.

Why this matters now

Shows that even an iconic, city-owned venue can be forced to accept enforceable sound limits—though it can take years of conflict.

2013-2017

Forest Hills Stadium reopening (Queens, New York City)

When the historic Forest Hills Stadium in Queens reopened for concerts in 2013, residents of the adjoining Forest Hills Gardens neighborhood immediately complained about loud bass. The venue initially claimed an exemption from city noise rules, then faced community pressure to change.

Then

The venue hired a sound engineer, adjusted speaker placement, and agreed to earlier weeknight endings.

Now

The stadium now operates under a community agreement with the neighborhood, a model for voluntary mitigation.

Why this matters now

Demonstrates the voluntary mitigation path: a venue can reduce noise complaints without formal regulation if neighbors have leverage.

1984-present

Riverbend Music Center (Cincinnati, Ohio)

Riverbend opened on the Ohio River in 1984, across the water from Anderson Township. Residents immediately complained about concert noise drifting over the river, and the township and venue operator have argued over sound limits and curfews for decades.

Then

The venue adopted curfews and sound controls, but complaints resurface each season.

Now

The dispute is a permanent feature of Riverbend operations—a pattern that recurs when venues sit near residential areas.

Why this matters now

Suggests Grand Rapids' noise conflict may become an annual ritual rather than a one-time issue.

Sources

(12)