SF housing nonprofit MEDA could lose city funding after alleged employee self-dealing
Money Moves San Francisco, CA localThe Controller's Office gave MEDA its most serious risk designation for city-contracted nonprofits
Yesterday: Controller gives MEDA its top risk designationNew here? Follow stories to track developments over time. Create a free account to get updates when stories you care about change.
Overview
San Francisco's Controller's Office has given the Mission Economic Development Agency (MEDA), a major player in the city's affordable housing system, its most serious risk designation for city-contracted nonprofits. It cites alleged unauthorized employee expenses and self-dealing, along with nine other financial concerns.
The designation could lead to stricter oversight and the loss of millions of dollars in city funding if MEDA does not fix the problems; it can be lowered or removed after corrective steps. MEDA says it believes it was the victim of a crime and that the former employee no longer works there. Separately, Supervisors Matt Dorsey and Danny Sauter delayed a vote on a city loan of up to $22 million to help MEDA buy a 39-unit building.
Why it matters
MEDA is a major player in San Francisco's affordable housing system. If the city cuts its funding or holds back the loan, its housing work - including the 39-unit building purchase - could stall.
Monday: what changed in San Francisco, CA
One short email a week with the openings, closings, permits and council votes we covered. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.
Questions about this story
Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.
No questions yet — be the first to ask.
Key Indicators
Voices
Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.
Timeline
-
Controller gives MEDA its top risk designation
Latest OversightSFist reports the Controller's Office gave MEDA its most serious risk designation for city-contracted nonprofits, citing alleged self-dealing and nine other financial concerns.
Scenarios
City cuts MEDA's funding
Discussed by: SFist reporting on the Controller's risk designation
MEDA does not resolve the Controller's concerns, the designation stays, and the city reduces or ends its funding.
MEDA keeps funding after corrective steps
Discussed by: SFist: the designation can be lowered or removed after corrective measures
MEDA addresses the flagged concerns and the Controller lowers or removes the designation, which SFist says is possible. City funding continues, possibly under stricter oversight.
Supervisors approve the $22 million loan
Discussed by: SFist: vote delayed by Supervisors Matt Dorsey and Danny Sauter
The delayed vote goes ahead and the city lends MEDA up to $22 million to buy the 39-unit building.
