Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why Ranks Sign Up
Supreme Court reviews Haiti and Syria TPS terminations

Supreme Court reviews Haiti and Syria TPS terminations

Rule Changes

Justices weigh whether courts can second-guess the Trump administration's decision to end deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of long-term residents

April 29th, 2026: Supreme Court hears oral arguments

Overview

Haitians have lived legally in the United States under a federal humanitarian program since the 2010 earthquake, as have Syrians since their civil war began. On April 29, 2026, the Supreme Court spent 80 minutes considering whether the Trump administration can revoke those protections — and whether any court can second-guess the decision.

The consolidated cases, Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot, ask whether federal courts can review the Homeland Security Secretary's decision to terminate a Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation, and whether Secretary Kristi Noem followed the procedure Congress wrote into the Immigration and Nationality Act. A ruling is expected by late June.

Roughly 350,000 Haitians and 6,100 Syrians could lose work authorization and face deportation if the Court sides with the administration.

Why it matters

If the Court sides with the administration, more than a million long-term residents from 17 countries could lose work permits and face deportation.

Questions about this story

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Play on this story Voices Debate Predict

Key Indicators

350,000
Haitian TPS holders
Long-term U.S. residents whose deportation protection hinges on the ruling.
~6,100
Syrian TPS holders
Plus 800 Syrians with pending applications also facing termination.
80
Minutes of oral argument
The Court extended the standard hour for the final argument of its April session.
1.3M
Total TPS holders
Across the 17 currently designated countries — a broad ruling could touch them all.
Late June
Expected ruling
The decision will arrive before the Court's summer recess.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Log in Sign Up

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Kristi Noem
Kristi Noem
Defending TPS terminations she signed in 2025
 D. John Sauer
D. John Sauer
Argued the cases for the administration on April 29, 2026
 Katherine Polk Failla
Katherine Polk Failla
Blocked Syria TPS termination in November 2025
 Ana C. Reyes
Ana C. Reyes
Blocked Haiti TPS termination in February 2026

Organizations Involved

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Federal Department
Defendant in Syria case, petitioner in Haiti case

The cabinet department whose Secretary holds statutory authority to designate and terminate TPS country listings.
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Federal Court
Hearing consolidated cases

The nation's highest court, which granted certiorari before judgment to fast-track the TPS cases.
ACLU of Northern California
ACLU of Northern California
Civil Liberties Organization
Co-counsel for Syrian plaintiffs

Lead organizational counsel for the Syrian TPS holders in Mullin v. Doe.

Timeline

November 1990 April 2026

12 events Latest: April 29th, 2026 · 1 month ago Showing 8 of 12
Tap a bar to jump to that date

  1. Supreme Court hears oral arguments

    Latest Legal

    The justices hear 80 minutes of argument in Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Miot. The administration argues the terminations are unreviewable; challengers argue Noem ignored statutory procedure and acted on discriminatory grounds.

  2. Supreme Court fast-tracks both cases

    Legal

    The Court defers the stay request but grants certiorari before judgment, consolidating the Syria and Haiti cases and scheduling oral argument for the final day of the April session.

  3. Solicitor General petitions Supreme Court

    Legal

    Solicitor General D. John Sauer files an application for stay and a request for certiorari before judgment, asking the justices to bypass the appeals court and rule directly.

  4. Federal judge blocks Haiti TPS termination

    Legal

    U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes in Washington stays the termination one day before it would take effect, finding plaintiffs substantially likely to prove discrimination against nonwhite immigrants.

  5. Haitian plaintiffs sue in D.C. federal court

    Legal

    Five Haitian TPS holders file the class action that becomes Trump v. Miot, alleging the termination was procedurally invalid and motivated by racial animus.

  6. Noem terminates Haiti TPS

    Executive Action

    DHS announces Haiti's TPS designation will end February 3, 2026, citing both the absence of extraordinary conditions in Haiti and a determination that continued protection is contrary to the national interest.

  7. Federal judge blocks Syria TPS termination

    Legal

    U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla in New York issues a preliminary injunction halting the Syria termination two days before it would take effect, finding plaintiffs likely to succeed on Administrative Procedure Act claims.

  8. Supreme Court allows Venezuela TPS termination

    Legal

    In an unsigned shadow-docket order, the Court grants the government's request to lift a district court injunction, clearing the way for DHS to strip TPS from roughly 600,000 Venezuelans.

  9. Noem terminates Syria TPS

    Executive Action

    DHS Secretary Kristi Noem announces Syria's TPS designation will end November 21, citing Syria's purported move toward stable institutional governance after Assad's December 2024 fall.

  10. Syria designated for TPS amid civil war

    Designation

    DHS designates Syria for TPS as Bashar al-Assad's crackdown escalates into full civil war. The designation is repeatedly extended over the following 13 years.

  11. Haiti designated for TPS after earthquake

    Designation

    DHS designates Haiti for TPS following the January 12 earthquake that killed an estimated 200,000 people. The designation has been extended every 18 months for 16 years.

  12. Congress creates Temporary Protected Status

    Legislation

    President George H.W. Bush signs the Immigration Act of 1990, establishing TPS as a humanitarian protection from deportation for nationals of countries facing armed conflict, disaster, or other extraordinary conditions.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

March 2018 - February 2023

Ramos v. Nielsen (2018-2023)

During the first Trump administration, DHS moved to terminate TPS for El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan, affecting more than 300,000 people. Nine TPS holders and five U.S.-citizen children sued. A federal judge in San Francisco issued a preliminary injunction; a divided Ninth Circuit panel reversed in 2020, holding the terminations were unreviewable.

Then

TPS holders kept protections under the injunction throughout the first Trump term. The Biden administration redesignated the affected countries in 2021-2022, mooting much of the litigation.

Now

The en banc Ninth Circuit vacated the panel opinion in February 2023, leaving the reviewability question unresolved at the appellate level — the same question now squarely before the Supreme Court.

Why this matters now

Ramos is the direct predecessor litigation. The Trump administration's brief leans on the vacated Ninth Circuit panel reasoning, while challengers argue the en banc vacatur means that reasoning carries no weight.

June 2020

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of UC (2020)

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the first Trump administration's rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program violated the Administrative Procedure Act because DHS had failed to adequately consider reliance interests. Chief Justice Roberts wrote the opinion.

Then

DACA was reinstated, protecting roughly 700,000 recipients from deportation. The administration's challenge to the program was sent back to the agency for further proceedings.

Now

The case established that immigration policy reversals — even discretionary ones — are reviewable under the APA when challenged on procedural grounds, a precedent the TPS challengers rely on heavily.

Why this matters now

Regents is the strongest precedent for the challengers' procedural argument. The administration's position is that TPS, unlike DACA, comes with an explicit statutory review bar that Regents did not address.

October 2025

Noem v. National TPS Alliance (October 2025)

Six months before the Haiti and Syria arguments, the Supreme Court issued a brief unsigned order on its emergency docket allowing the administration to terminate TPS for roughly 600,000 Venezuelans, lifting a district court injunction. The Court provided no reasoning.

Then

Venezuelan TPS holders lost work authorization and deportation protection effective immediately, with no merits ruling and no opportunity for full briefing.

Now

The order signaled that a majority of the Court is skeptical of injunctions blocking TPS terminations — but because it was a shadow-docket stay, it set no formal precedent on the underlying legal questions now being argued in Mullin and Miot.

Why this matters now

The Venezuela order is why the Haiti and Syria cases matter beyond their named beneficiaries: this is the Court's first chance to write a reasoned opinion on whether and how courts can review TPS terminations.

Sources

(10)
+4
SCOTUSblog Supreme Court of the United States ACLU of Northern California CBS News Roll Call USCIS SCOTUSblog SCOTUSblog ACLU of Northern California SCOTUSblog