Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why Ranks Sign Up
Senate locks in multi-year ICE and Border Patrol funding

Senate locks in multi-year ICE and Border Patrol funding

Money Moves

Republicans used budget reconciliation to fund immigration enforcement through the end of Trump's term, bypassing the filibuster and shielding the agencies from future shutdown fights.

Today: Senate passes the $70 billion package

Overview

ICE and Border Patrol budgets normally have to be renegotiated every year, which gives both parties leverage during shutdown fights. Early Friday, the Senate voted 52-47 to fund them for three years straight, through the end of President Trump's term.

Republicans used budget reconciliation to do it, a process that needs only a simple majority and cannot be filibustered. No Democrat voted yes. The roughly $70 billion package now goes to the House, where a vote could come next week.

Why it matters

Congress is locking in three years of ICE and Border Patrol money, shielding deportation operations from future shutdown fights and annual budget leverage.

Questions about this story

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Play on this story Voices Debate Predict Higher or Lower

Key Indicators

$70B
Total package
Immigration enforcement funding approved by the Senate.
$38.6B
For ICE
The single largest line item, going to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
52-47
Final vote
Passed on party lines, with one Republican defection.
3 yrs
Funding window
Money is locked in through the end of Trump's term.
$1.8B
Settlement fund
A contested Justice Department fund the bill left intact.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Log in Sign Up

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 3 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Higher or Lower Two numbers from this story. Guess which is bigger. 5 rounds to set a streak. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

John Thune
John Thune
Steered the bill to passage
 Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer
Led failed effort to kill the bill
 Lisa Murkowski
Lisa Murkowski
Only Republican to vote no
 Todd Blanche
Todd Blanche
Sent mixed signals on the settlement fund
 Donald Trump
Donald Trump
Primary beneficiary of the funding

Organizations Involved

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Federal Agency
Largest recipient of the new funding

The federal agency that handles immigration arrests, detention, and deportations inside the United States.
United States Senate
United States Senate
Legislative Chamber
Passed the bill

The upper chamber of Congress, where Republicans used a simple-majority budget process to pass the bill.
Department of Justice
Department of Justice
Federal Agency
Would administer the contested settlement fund

The federal law department that would run the $1.8 billion fund left intact in the bill.

Timeline

4 events Latest: Today
Tap a bar to jump to that date

  1. Senate passes the $70 billion package

    Today Legislative

    The Senate voted 52-47 to fund ICE and Border Patrol for three years. Murkowski was the only Republican to oppose it.

  2. Vote-a-rama begins, Democratic kill motion fails

    Legislative

    The Senate opened a roughly 19-hour amendment marathon. Schumer's motion to send the bill back to committee failed 49-50.

  3. Trump muddies the picture

    Statement

    Asked about the fund in the Oval Office, Trump said he was unsure, reopening a question his own attorney general had tried to close.

  4. Acting AG signals fund will be dropped

    Statement

    Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told a House panel the administration planned to drop the contested $1.8 billion settlement fund.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

2025

Trump's signature 2025 reconciliation law

Republicans used budget reconciliation, the same simple-majority process, to pass a large tax and spending law over unified Democratic opposition. Reconciliation let them avoid the 60-vote filibuster. It became the main vehicle for the party's domestic agenda.

Then

The law passed without any Democratic votes, setting the pattern for one-party budget bills.

Now

It established reconciliation as the go-to tool for locking in priorities that could not survive a filibuster.

Why this matters now

This immigration package uses the same procedure. Understanding reconciliation explains how $70 billion passed with zero votes from the other party.

2015 and 2019

DHS funding shutdown standoffs

Twice, fights over immigration policy nearly shut down or did shut down parts of the government tied to the Department of Homeland Security. Funding for the department became a yearly bargaining chip between the parties.

Then

Both standoffs ended with short-term deals, leaving the underlying fights unresolved.

Now

Annual DHS funding stayed a recurring pressure point that either party could use as leverage.

Why this matters now

By funding ICE and Border Patrol for three years at once, this bill removes that leverage. That is exactly why Murkowski objected to the multi-year approach.

Sources

(6)
NPR CNN CNBC The Washington Times CBS News Roll Call