The 75-country immigrant visa freeze took effect January 21, 2026, as planned. Two weeks later, a coalition of civil rights groups sued in federal court, arguing the ban violates immigration law and the Constitution. The case, CLINIC v. Rubio, is pending on cross-motions for partial summary judgment with no injunction issued as of May 2026.
On May 22, USCIS announced that most green card applicants inside the United States must now leave and apply from their home country. The agency called it a return to the law's 'original intent'; attorneys say the practice the memo reverses has been standard for over 50 years. The change affects roughly 500,000 people a year—half of all annual green card filings.
Why it matters
For roughly 500,000 people legally in the U.S., getting a green card now means first leaving the country.
18 events
Latest: May 22nd, 2026 · 1 week ago
Showing 8 of 18
JK to step
Tap a bar to jump to that date
Jump to
May 2026
USCIS restricts green card applications to overseas processing
LatestPolicy
USCIS Policy Memo PM-602-0199 limits adjustment of status to 'extraordinary circumstances.' Most of the roughly 500,000 people who apply for green cards from inside the US each year must now leave and apply at a consulate abroad.
February 2026
Federal lawsuit filed challenging 75-country visa freeze
Legal
CLINIC, African Communities Together, and eleven individual plaintiffs sue Secretary Rubio in the Southern District of New York. The complaint argues the freeze violates the INA, the APA, separation of powers, and the Fifth Amendment's equal protection guarantee.
January 2026
75-country immigrant visa suspension announced
Policy
State Department announces indefinite suspension of immigrant visa processing for 75 countries effective January 21, citing public charge concerns. Cato Institute estimates the move blocks roughly half of all U.S. legal immigration.
State Department reports 100,000+ visa revocations
Data
Officials announce more than 100,000 visas revoked since Trump's return to office—a record and more than double the 40,000 revoked in 2024.
Federal lawsuit challenges processing pause
Legal
Nearly 200 immigrants file suit in Boston federal court alleging the administration lacks authority to freeze green card, citizenship, and asylum adjudications for people already in the country.
Expanded travel ban takes effect
Implementation
Nationals from 19 countries face full travel ban; 20 additional countries face partial restrictions on immigrant and certain non-immigrant visas.
December 2025
Diversity visa lottery indefinitely paused
Policy
Secretary Rubio announces indefinite pause on the diversity visa program, which admits up to 55,000 immigrants annually through random selection.
Travel ban expanded to 39 countries
Executive Action
Proclamation 10988 doubles the travel ban, adding full restrictions on 7 new countries and partial restrictions on 15 more, effective January 1, 2026. Removes exemptions for Afghan SIV applicants.
Family reunification parole programs terminated
Policy
DHS terminates Family Reunification Parole Processes programs; any remaining parole expires January 14, 2026.
November 2025
DHS proposes rescinding 2022 public charge rule
Regulatory
DHS issues proposed rule to rescind Biden-era public charge regulations, restoring broader officer discretion to deny applicants.
State Department issues public charge enforcement cable
Policy
Internal cable instructs consular officers to enforce stricter screening under the public charge provision, weighing health, age, English proficiency, and finances.
August 2025
USCIS expands social media vetting
Policy
USCIS announces expanded social media screening for benefit requests, including reviews for 'anti-American' and 'antisemitic' activity.
July 2025
One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed
Legislation
Major legislation strips many lawfully present immigrants from health insurance and nutrition aid access.
June 2025
First travel ban proclamation issued
Executive Action
Proclamation 10949 restricts entry of nationals from 19 countries deemed to have deficient screening and vetting information.
May 2025
Supreme Court allows CHNV parole termination
Legal
The Supreme Court permits the administration to end parole status for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans who entered through humanitarian programs.
January 2025
Laken Riley Act signed
Legislation
Trump signs the Laken Riley Act, mandating detention of immigrants charged with or convicted of certain crimes.
Rubio confirmed as Secretary of State
Personnel
The Senate confirms Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, giving him jurisdiction over all visa issuance.
President Trump signs executive orders declaring a border emergency, blocking asylum seekers, ending catch-and-release, and attempting to end birthright citizenship for children of non-permanent residents.
Historical Context
3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.
1 of 3
May 1882
Chinese Exclusion Act (1882)
Congress passed the first federal law restricting immigration based on nationality, barring Chinese laborers for 10 years. The law was extended repeatedly, made permanent in 1902, and not repealed until 1943. At its peak, enforcement created the first federal immigration bureaucracy and detention facilities at Angel Island.
Then
Chinese immigration dropped from 39,500 in 1882 to 10 in 1887. Existing Chinese residents faced registration requirements and could not naturalize.
Now
Established the precedent that the federal government could exclude entire nationalities. The framework expanded to other Asian groups and informed the national origins quotas of the 1920s.
Why this matters now
The 75-country suspension similarly applies blanket nationality-based determinations rather than individual assessment—the first such approach since the national origins system ended in 1965.
2 of 3
May 1924
Immigration Act of 1924 (Johnson-Reed Act)
Congress capped annual immigration at 165,000—an 80% reduction from pre-WWI levels—and allocated visas based on the 1890 census to favor Northern and Western Europeans. The law banned immigration from Asia entirely and created the Border Patrol and consular visa system.
Then
Immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe collapsed. Asian immigration effectively ended. Japan protested the law as a violation of the Gentlemen's Agreement; both ambassadors resigned.
Now
The law shaped U.S. demographics for 40 years until the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 abolished the national origins system. Historians trace a line from the 1924 act's 'perpetual foreigner' framing to Japanese internment in 1942.
Why this matters now
The 75-country suspension echoes the 1924 framework by applying nationality-based presumptions about who is desirable. Both justified restrictions on grounds of protecting American workers and resources from immigrants deemed unlikely to contribute.
3 of 3
June 2018
Trump v. Hawaii (2018)
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to uphold the third version of Trump's travel ban, which restricted entry from seven countries (five majority-Muslim). Chief Justice Roberts wrote that the president has broad authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act to suspend entry of any class of aliens deemed detrimental to U.S. interests.
Then
The travel ban remained in effect until Biden rescinded it in January 2021. Lower court injunctions were lifted.
Now
The ruling established wide judicial deference to executive immigration restrictions, even those critics argued had discriminatory intent. The decision explicitly overruled Korematsu v. United States but affirmed expansive presidential power over entry.
Why this matters now
The 2018 ruling provides the legal foundation for the current policy. The administration is testing whether the Court's deference extends to suspending immigrant visa processing for 75 countries under public charge authority.
