Pull to refresh
Logo
What Changed
Following Why Sign Up
House passes bipartisan bill to shield ratepayers from data center electricity costs

House passes bipartisan bill to shield ratepayers from data center electricity costs

Rule Changes

The Senate rejected the House-passed Ratepayer Protection Act 57–43 on September 30, three votes short of the 60 needed to break a filibuster, with four Democrats crossing over. New Senate proposals and state laws are pressing the data center cost question forward while the federal bill waits on the lame-duck session.

October 3rd, 2026: Ohio counties to vote on data center restrictions in November

Overview

Updated Oct 3

The House voted 417–3 on September 16 to pass the Ratepayer Protection Act, which tells state regulators to hold hearings on whether data centers drawing 100 megawatts or more should pay the full cost of the power infrastructure built for them. States can hold the hearings and decline to adopt the standard, and the Senate fell three votes short of advancing the bill on September 30, 57–43.

Senate Democrats who blocked it call the bill toothless and want tougher rules; Martin Heinrich's GRID Savings Act would give federal regulators direct power over large power users. With the House adjourned until after the November 3 election, federal action waits for the lame-duck session. States are not waiting: California now requires separate rate classes and upfront grid payments for high-use facilities, and Virginia's governor wants data centers to pay for transmission built solely for them.

Why it matters

The first federal attempt to shift data center grid costs onto the companies building them, not the households paying for new electricity infrastructure.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

6 to 1
Likely-voter opposition to local data centers
NBC News poll: voters said by nearly 6 to 1 they'd be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports building a data center in their community; voters trusted Democrats over Republicans by 12 points to handle the issue.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Log in Sign Up

People Involved

Kathy Castor
Kathy Castor
U.S. Representative (D-Fla.), co-sponsor
One of the Democratic Party's most vulnerable incumbents this November
GE
Gabe Evans
U.S. Representative (R-Colo.), lead sponsor
Among the GOP's most vulnerable incumbents this cycle
 Jon Husted
Jon Husted
U.S. Senator (R-Ohio)
Sought unanimous consent for the House bill on September 17; the September 30 cloture vote fell three votes short
 Martin Heinrich
Martin Heinrich
U.S. Senator (D-N.M.), ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee
Blocked the House bill on September 17; led opposition to the September 30 cloture vote, which failed 57-43
 Rashida Tlaib
Rashida Tlaib
U.S. Representative (D-Mich.)
Voted no on September 16
 Allison Clements
Allison Clements
Former Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) commissioner, principal at 804 Advisory
Calls the bill a limited but useful step
 Brett Guthrie
Brett Guthrie
U.S. Representative (R-Ky.)
Supported the bill on the floor
 Bernie Moreno
Bernie Moreno
U.S. Senator (R-Ohio)
Blocked Heinrich's alternative on September 17
 John Curtis
John Curtis
U.S. Senator (R-Utah)
Introducing an alternative data center disclosure bill with Sen. Lisa Blunt Rochester
 Lisa Blunt Rochester
Lisa Blunt Rochester
U.S. Senator (D-Del.)
Introducing an alternative data center disclosure bill with Sen. John Curtis

Organizations Involved

U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. House of Representatives
Chamber of Congress
Passed H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, on September 16, 2026

The lower chamber of Congress, whose 417-3 vote sent the Ratepayer Protection Act to the Senate.
United States Senate
United States Senate
Legislative chamber
Voted 57-43 on September 30 to advance the House bill, three votes short of the 60 needed; four Democrats crossed over

The upper chamber, where Majority Leader John Thune has floated passing the House bill before November's elections.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
US federal regulator
Source of the legal framework limiting the bill's reach

The agency at the center of the 1982 Supreme Court case that bars the federal government from dictating utility rate structures to states.
White House Ratepayer Protection Pledge
White House Ratepayer Protection Pledge
Executive initiative
Voluntary agreement the House bill partly codifies

A voluntary agreement signed by more than 300 utilities, electric cooperatives, and hyperscalers to keep data center costs off residential bills.

Timeline

November 1978 October 2026

11 events Latest: October 3rd, 2026 · 1 month ago Showing 8 of 11
Tap a bar to jump to that date

  1. Ohio counties to vote on data center restrictions in November

    Latest Ballot Measure

    Twenty of the 38 data center-related local ballot measures nationwide this year are in Ohio. Pataskala voters on November 3 will decide whether to prohibit new data centers with peak demand over 25 megawatts.

  2. Curtis and Blunt Rochester unveil data center disclosure bill

    Legislation

    Sens. John Curtis (R-Utah) and Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) are introducing an alternative bill that would require data center companies to give host communities more information and add federal reporting on the environmental impacts of large data centers.

  3. NBC News poll finds voters oppose local data centers by 6 to 1

    Poll

    An NBC News poll found voters said by nearly 6 to 1 they'd be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports building a data center in their community. Voters trusted Democrats over Republicans by 12 points to handle data centers.

  4. Senate rejects House data center bill, 57–43

    Legislation

    A cloture motion on H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection Act, failed 57-43, three votes short of the 60 needed to advance. Democrats Maggie Hassan, Amy Klobuchar, Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock voted yes; Martin Heinrich led the opposition.

  5. FERC commissioner urges PJM to assign data center costs to growth zones

    Regulatory

    In a concurrence on PJM Interconnection's reliability backstop procurement, FERC Commissioner David Rosner wrote that the guidance should let PJM assign costs to zones with data center growth. He also urged states to set large-load retail tariffs and decide which customers are curtailed first.

  6. California enacts data center ratepayer laws

    Legislation

    Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a package that creates a separate rate class for high-consumption facilities, requires upfront payment for grid upgrades, and adds long-term contract and minimum payment obligations.

  7. Virginia governor announces data center accountability framework

    Government

    Gov. Abigail Spanberger's framework, paired with an executive order already in effect, would make data centers pay for transmission built solely for them and post stronger upfront financial commitments. Legislation is proposed for 2027.

  8. Senate Democrats block fast-track vote on Ratepayer Protection Act

    Legislation

    Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., objected to unanimous consent for the House-passed bill, arguing its voluntary standards are insufficient. He offered the GRID Savings Act of 2026, which would give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rulemaking power over large power users; Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, blocked that. Majority Leader John Thune said the chamber could revisit the issue after other business.

  9. House passes the Ratepayer Protection Act

    Legislation

    The House votes 417-3 to send the bill to the Senate, requiring states to hold hearings on making large data centers bear grid upgrade costs. The chamber then adjourns until after the November 3 election.

  10. FERC v. Mississippi decided

    Legal

    The Supreme Court rules the federal government can require states to consider standards but cannot dictate utility rate structures.

  11. PURPA signed into law

    Legislation

    Congress passes the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, pushing states to consider energy conservation and rate reform.

Scenarios

1

Senate clears the bill before the midterms

Possible Resolves by Jan 3, 2027

Discussed by: Senate Majority Leader John Thune; Sen. Jon Husted's office

Thune said the House bill could clear the Senate before the November elections, likely through unanimous consent given the crowded floor agenda. Husted introduced the companion bill and is talking with senators about moving it. Passage would send the measure to President Trump's desk, with the first state hearings required within a year of enactment.

2

Bill dies with the 119th Congress

Possible Resolves by Jan 3, 2027

Discussed by: Sen. Martin Heinrich; The Hill and Roll Call coverage of Senate uncertainty

The bill faces a full Senate calendar and a skeptical top Democrat who calls it toothless. If it misses this month's window, it lands in the post-election lame-duck session, where a dozen other priorities compete for time. Tlaib's opposition from the left shows the measure also lacks a progressive base of support.

3

Enacted, but states change little

Likely Resolves by Sep 16, 2028

Discussed by: Allison Clements, former FERC commissioner; Tyson Slocum, energy policy advocate quoted by SAN

Even if signed into law, the bill only requires hearings, not adoption. Around half of states already require large-load tariffs for data centers, so the mandate is duplicative there. Clements said the requirement would be "duplicative in a lot of states" and far from sufficient. Advocates see the main value as forcing proceedings in states with no data center rate standards at all.

4

Senate clears a stronger version before the midterms

Possible Resolves by Nov 3, 2026

Discussed by: Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.); Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio)

Heinrich's alternative would make data centers and other large industrial power users pay for grid upgrades, not just consider doing so. Moreno blocked the alternative on September 17 but left the door open for negotiation. If the two reach a deal, a revised bill could move by unanimous consent before the November elections.

5

Standoff carries into the lame-duck session

Likely Resolves by Jan 3, 2027

Discussed by: Washington Times reporting on the House adjournment; Senate Majority Leader John Thune

The House adjourned after the September 16 vote until after the November 3 election. If the Senate cannot clear the House-passed bill by unanimous consent before then, any amended version would need House action in the post-election session, competing with permitting reform and appropriations for floor time.

6

Permitting deal assigns data center grid costs in November

Uncertain Resolves by End of 2026

Discussed by: Politico reporting on the Senate permitting agreement; Alpha Briefing analysis

A Senate permitting deal reportedly assigns transmission costs for large computational loads of 20 megawatts or more to the data centers themselves, with exit charges and a bar on recovering those costs from other customers. The Senate is set to take up amendments when it reconvenes in November. The House may resist parts of the package, and the administration's treatment of renewables stays open.

7

States keep legislating while Congress stalls

Likely Resolves by Q2 2027

Discussed by: Environment+Energy Leader coverage of California and Virginia actions

California law and a proposed Virginia framework already push data center grid costs onto the companies, and FERC guidance points regional grids toward assigning costs to data center growth zones. If the federal bill stays stalled, more states could act on their own through 2027.

8

Local ballot measures restrict data centers after the federal bill stays stalled

Likely Resolves by Nov 4, 2026

Discussed by: Big Energy News coverage of Ohio ballot measures

With Congress in recess until after November 3, 38 local data center measures go before voters nationwide, 20 in Ohio alone. Pataskala's charter amendment would permanently bar new data centers over 25 megawatts regardless of developer. If local restrictions pass, they could slow buildout and reshape where data centers locate, even if the federal bill dies in the lame-duck session.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

November 1978 – June 1982

PURPA and FERC v. Mississippi (1978-1982)

Congress passed the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act in 1978 to push states toward energy efficiency and fair rate design. In June 1982, the Supreme Court ruled in FERC v. Mississippi that the federal government can require states to consider a standard, but cannot dictate the rate structure itself.

Then

States ran the required proceedings, and the federal standard-setting model survived with state discretion intact.

Now

The 'consider, don't require' framework became the template for federal rate policy, and the Ratepayer Protection Act uses exactly that structure.

Why this matters now

Explains why the bill directs states to hold hearings rather than imposing rate rules outright: the 1982 ruling forbids the latter.

1980s

Nuclear cost-overrun ratepayer battles (1980s)

Utilities building nuclear plants like Seabrook and Shoreham faced massive cost overruns, and ratepayers and regulators fought over who should pay for over-budget or canceled projects. State commissions began requiring prudence reviews before letting costs pass through to bills.

Then

Some utilities absorbed billions in costs, while ratepayers in other states avoided the full impact of overruns.

Now

Established that big infrastructure costs are not automatically passed to ratepayers; regulators can scrutinize and shift them.

Why this matters now

Today's question is the same: whether new grid infrastructure built for data centers lands on the companies creating the demand or on the households that did not.

Sources

(33)
+27
r/energy (Reddit) CBS News Axios The Hill AFP Roll Call SAN Deseret News Bloomberg Government The Independent The Straits Times The Washington Times Utility Dive CNBC Bisnow BitsMinds American Almanac The Daily Chronicle Tom's Hardware Medill on the Hill yourNEWS POLITICO Legis1 NBC News Texas Politics Environment+Energy Leader Alpha Briefing Big Energy News Roll Call CBS News Roll Call The Hill POLITICO Live Updates