Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
James Batson, a Black man, was tried for burglary in Kentucky after the prosecutor used peremptory strikes to remove all four Black potential jurors. The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that the Equal Protection Clause forbids race-based strikes.
Batson's conviction was vacated and the Court created a three-step test for raising and rebutting race-discrimination claims in jury selection.
The Batson framework became the central tool defendants use to challenge prosecutor strikes, though enforcement has been inconsistent for four decades.
Pitchford is a direct application of Batson's step three, where the defense must be allowed to rebut the prosecutor's race-neutral reasons. The Mississippi courts skipped that step.
