Supreme Court reverses Mississippi death sentence over jury selection bias
Rule ChangesPitchford v. Cain revives Batson scrutiny after Mississippi struck four of five Black jurors at a 2006 capital trial
May 28th, 2026: Supreme Court reverses 5-4New here? Follow stories to track developments over time. Create a free account to get updates when stories you care about change.
Overview
Updated May 28Terry Pitchford has sat on Mississippi's death row for nearly two decades. On May 28, 2026, the Supreme Court threw out his conviction and ordered the state to start over, ruling 5-4 that the prosecutor's jury selection violated his constitutional rights.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. He was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's three liberals, while Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, Alito, and Barrett dissented. The ruling restores teeth to Batson v. Kentucky, the 1986 case that barred prosecutors from striking jurors based on race.
Why it matters
State courts cannot use procedural shortcuts to dodge claims of racial bias in jury selection. Defendants get a clearer path to challenge prosecutors' strikes.
Questions about this story
Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.
No questions yet — be the first to ask.
Key Indicators
Voices
Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.
Play
Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.
Higher or Lower
A number from this story, against one from elsewhere in the news — guess which is bigger, then keep the chain going. 5 rounds, 3 strikes; a miss costs a strike and resets your streak.
Keyboard: ↓/L lower · ↑/H higher
0 points — sign up to put that on the leaderboard.
Timeline
Order five events from this story, oldest at top. Each in the right slot scores 1 — neighbours within one slot count too. Your previous result — green ✓ for exact slots, yellow ~ for off by one. Cards now in true chronological order.
Sign up to save your score and track a streak across stories.
Connections
Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Four mistakes max.
Sign up to keep a daily streak — a new puzzle lands every day.
Exit debate?
Your progress in this debate will be lost.
- 1 Two AI personas square off on this story.
- 2 You predict who'll win each round — correct picks earn XP.
- 3 One crossfire question is yours to fire. Pick it carefully.
Couldn't generate a topic
Select Your Champions
Choose one persona for each side of the debate
DEBATE TOPIC
Choose personas with different perspectives for a more dynamic debate.
Select debater for this side:
No debate personas available right now.
Select debater for this side:
No debate personas available right now.
Who's Got This Round?
Make your prediction before the referee scores
The referee scores both sides on
Round Results
Set the Crossfire
Pick the question both personas must answer in the final round
Debate Oracle! You called every round!
Sharp Instincts! You know your debaters!
The Coin Flip Strategist! Perfectly balanced!
The Contrarian! Bold predictions!
Inverse Genius! Try betting the opposite next time!
XP Breakdown
Prediction History
People Involved
Organizations Involved
The nation's highest court, which granted certiorari in 2025 and reversed the Fifth Circuit.
The state high court that upheld Pitchford's conviction and ruled he had forfeited his Batson challenge.
The federal appeals court covering Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, which had reinstated Pitchford's conviction.
Timeline
April 1986 May 2026
-
Supreme Court reverses 5-4
Latest RulingKavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, holds the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably applied Batson. Conviction vacated; case remanded.
-
Oral argument
LegalJustices probe whether the trial record shows defense counsel was actually given a chance to rebut the prosecutor's race-neutral reasons.
-
Supreme Court grants certiorari
LegalThe justices agree to hear Pitchford's challenge, with briefing focused on whether the state court's Batson ruling deserved AEDPA deference.
-
Fifth Circuit reverses
LegalThe federal appeals court reinstates Pitchford's conviction, holding the Mississippi Supreme Court's ruling was not unreasonable under AEDPA's deferential standard.
-
Federal district court grants habeas relief
LegalA federal judge in Mississippi rules the Batson violation undermined Pitchford's conviction and orders a new trial.
-
Flowers v. Mississippi decided
PrecedentThe US Supreme Court overturns the murder conviction of Curtis Flowers, prosecuted by the same Doug Evans, citing a pattern of striking Black jurors. Kavanaugh writes the 7-2 opinion.
-
Mississippi Supreme Court affirms conviction
LegalOn direct appeal, the state high court holds Pitchford waived his Batson challenge by not pressing it further at trial.
-
Pitchford convicted, sentenced to death
LegalAn 11-1 white jury finds Pitchford guilty of capital murder. Bullins, ineligible for the death penalty as a minor, receives 20 years.
-
Capital trial and Batson dispute
LegalDistrict Attorney Doug Evans uses peremptory strikes on four of five Black potential jurors. The trial court accepts his race-neutral reasons; the colloquy ends before the defense rebuts.
-
Grenada grocery store robbery and killing
IncidentTerry Pitchford, 18, and Eric Bullins, 16, rob the Crossroads Grocery near Grenada, Mississippi. Bullins shoots and kills the owner, Reuben Britt.
-
Supreme Court decides Batson v. Kentucky
PrecedentThe Court bars prosecutors from striking jurors on the basis of race and creates a three-step framework for raising and rebutting such challenges.
Historical Context
3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.
Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
James Batson, a Black man, was tried for burglary in Kentucky after the prosecutor used peremptory strikes to remove all four Black potential jurors. The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that the Equal Protection Clause forbids race-based strikes.
Batson's conviction was vacated and the Court created a three-step test for raising and rebutting race-discrimination claims in jury selection.
The Batson framework became the central tool defendants use to challenge prosecutor strikes, though enforcement has been inconsistent for four decades.
Pitchford is a direct application of Batson's step three, where the defense must be allowed to rebut the prosecutor's race-neutral reasons. The Mississippi courts skipped that step.
Foster v. Chatman (2016)
Timothy Foster, a Black death-row prisoner in Georgia, obtained prosecutors' jury-selection notes through an open-records request. The notes highlighted every Black juror's name in green and ranked them by who to strike first.
The Supreme Court ruled 7-1 that the strikes were racially motivated and vacated Foster's death sentence.
Foster set a high-water mark for proving Batson violations with documentary evidence; most cases lack such smoking guns.
Foster showed the Court would dig into trial records to find Batson violations. Pitchford extends that scrutiny to procedural rulings that effectively block defendants from making their case.
Flowers v. Mississippi (2019)
Curtis Flowers was tried six times for the same 1996 quadruple murder by District Attorney Doug Evans, the same prosecutor in Pitchford. Across the six trials, Evans struck 41 of 42 prospective Black jurors. The Supreme Court overturned the sixth conviction 7-2.
Flowers was released after charges were dropped in 2020. Justice Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, called the prosecutor's pattern of strikes 'relentless.'
The Flowers ruling put Evans's office under national scrutiny and amplified calls to reform peremptory strikes entirely. Several states have since limited their use.
Evans prosecuted both Flowers and Pitchford. Kavanaugh wrote both majority opinions. The pattern documented in Flowers gave context to Pitchford's claim that the strikes in his own case were not innocent.
