Pull to refresh
Logo
Civil rights groups sue to force release of records on mass immigration hearings

Civil rights groups sue to force release of records on mass immigration hearings

Rule Changes San Francisco, CA local

FOIA lawsuit targets 'mega master' hearings that pack 100 or more immigrants into single proceedings

Yesterday: Mission Local reports on the lawsuit

Overview

Updated 46 minutes ago

A San Francisco civil rights group and a national immigration nonprofit sued the Justice Department on Oct. 15, demanding records about 'mega master' hearings that pack 100 or more immigrants into a single court proceeding. The Executive Office for Immigration Review, which runs the nation's immigration courts, has not released a single document in response to a July records request.

Immigration attorneys say the mass hearings undermine due process: immigrants often learn of their hearings just weeks in advance, may lack translation services, and can be ordered deported in absentia if they fail to appear. Hundreds have been ordered removed this way, according to Mission Local's reporting.

Why it matters

If mass hearings continue without oversight, immigrants can be deported without ever getting a meaningful chance to defend themselves.

Monday: what changed in San Francisco, CA

One short email a week with the openings, closings, permits and council votes we covered. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

100+
Immigrants per mega master hearing
Upward of 100 immigration cases may be slated for a single hearing.
80
Average immigrants per Concord mega hearing
Average of 80 immigrants scheduled per mega master hearing in Concord between June and September.
0
Records released by EOIR
EOIR has not released a single record in response to the July FOIA request.
25
EOIR's recommended maximum per group hearing
EOIR's own 2017 guidance recommended no more than 25 respondents in a group hearing.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

2017 October 2026

9 events Latest: Yesterday
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Mission Local reports on the lawsuit

    Latest Media

    Mission Local publishes its report on the lawsuit and the mega master hearings at the Concord immigration court.

  2. 17 mega master hearings in Concord

    Data

    Concord court holds 17 mega master hearings in September, with an average of 80 immigrants scheduled per hearing since June.

  3. Mega master hearings begin at Concord court

    Policy

    Mega master hearings proliferate at the Concord immigration court, where San Francisco immigrants have had to attend court since the fall.

  4. EOIR issues group hearing guidance

    Policy

    EOIR guidance to newly appointed immigration judges recommends a maximum of 25 respondents in any group hearing.

Scenarios

1

Court orders EOIR to release records

Likely Resolves by Q2 2027

Discussed by: Plaintiffs' attorneys at LCCRSF and the National Immigration Project

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California grants summary judgment for the plaintiffs, finding that EOIR violated FOIA by failing to respond to the records request. The court orders EOIR to conduct a reasonable search and produce non-exempt records on an expedited basis.

2

EOIR releases records before court ruling

Possible Resolves by Q1 2027

Discussed by: Plaintiffs' attorneys

Under pressure from the lawsuit, EOIR produces at least some responsive records before the court issues a ruling. This could happen if the agency decides to avoid an adverse court order or if the court pushes for a negotiated resolution.

3

Case stalls, records stay sealed

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Immigration attorneys following the case

The case gets bogged down in procedural disputes, or the court allows EOIR to withhold records on law enforcement or other exemption grounds. The plaintiffs may appeal, extending the timeline and keeping the records out of public view.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

December 2005 - 2014

Operation Streamline (2005-2014)

A zero-tolerance border enforcement program in Del Rio, Texas, that processed illegal border crossers in mass hearings. Dozens of defendants appeared together, were convicted, and were sentenced in minutes, often without individual legal representation.

Then

Thousands were convicted and deported quickly, but the program drew sharp criticism from due process advocates.

Now

It set a precedent for mass processing of immigration cases, though it was later scaled back due to resource constraints and legal challenges.

Why this matters now

Shows the precedent of mass immigration hearings and the due process concerns they raise, which are central to the current mega master hearings.

March 2019

ACLU v. FBI FOIA lawsuit (2019)

The ACLU and MediaJustice filed a FOIA lawsuit seeking records about FBI targeting of Black activists, after the FBI failed to respond to a records request about a 2017 intelligence assessment.

Then

The lawsuit forced the FBI to process and release records about the assessment.

Now

Demonstrated that FOIA lawsuits can compel government transparency about surveillance and targeting.

Why this matters now

Shows the mechanism of using FOIA lawsuits to force government transparency, the same mechanism the civil rights groups are using here.

Sources

(3)