New proof of four-color theorem runs in near-linear time

Overview

Updated 2 hours ago

The four-color theorem says any map can be colored with four colors so no neighboring regions match. A team of six mathematicians posted a new proof in March 2026 that colors any planar graph in near-linear time, down from quadratic in the previous accepted proof.

The proof, scheduled for presentation in November at the Foundations of Computer Science conference, also reveals structural properties of planar graphs that may unlock other long-stubborn problems in graph theory.

Why it matters

The new proof colors planar graphs in near-linear time and exposes structural patterns that may crack other open problems in graph theory.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Play on this story Voices Debate Predict Higher or Lower Timeline Connections

Key Indicators

8,202

Configurations in new unavoidable set

The new proof's unavoidable set, larger than prior sets but reducible in parallel.

633

Configurations in 1997 Robertson et al. proof

The previously accepted proof's smaller unavoidable set, reduced one configuration at a time.

n log n

Algorithm complexity, new vs. old proof

Near-linear coloring steps for an n-vertex graph, compared with n-squared in the 1997 proof.

1,936

Appel-Haken 1976 configurations, initial count

The original computer-assisted proof's configuration set, later cut to 1,482.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Most of these play right now — no account needed. Sign up to save scores, keep a streak, and unlock Debate and Predict. Log in Sign Up

Predict 3 ways this could play out. Back the one you believe — contrarian picks score more when a scenario has a resolution date. Log in to play

People Involved

Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi

Graph theorist at Japan's National Institute of Informatics

Co-led the new proof; supervised graduate students who ran months of computation

Mikkel Thorup

Computer scientist at the University of Copenhagen

Co-led the project; credited with the parallel-reduction strategy

Carsten Thomassen

Graph theorist at the Technical University of Denmark

Co-author; called the search for a simple proof the 'four-color disease'

Bojan Mohar

Mathematician at Simon Fraser University

Co-author on the new proof

Georges Gonthier

Computer scientist at Inria in Paris

Commenting on the new proof; led prior formal verification of the four-color theorem

Organizations Involved

National Institute of Informatics

Research institute

Host institution for Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi and his graduate students

Japan's National Institute of Informatics hosted the computation-heavy search for the new unavoidable set.

University of Copenhagen

University

Host institution for Mikkel Thorup

The University of Copenhagen is where Thorup, a co-lead on the proof, works on algorithms and graph theory.

Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) conference

Academic conference

Scheduled venue for presenting the new proof in November 2026

FOCS is a top annual computer science theory conference, where the new proof will be presented in November 2026.

Timeline

October 1852 November 2026

7 events Latest: Yesterday

Tap a bar to jump to that date

November 2026
Proof scheduled for FOCS presentation
Upcoming Conference

The team will present the result at the annual Foundations of Computer Science conference, the first formal public review.
November 1st, 2026
September 2026
Quanta Magazine reports on the new proof
Latest Media coverage

Quanta publishes a detailed account of the proof's history, method, and implications, including reactions from other mathematicians.
Yesterday
March 2026
New near-linear proof posted to arXiv
Proof

Kawarabayashi, Thorup, Thomassen, Mohar, Inoue, and Miyashita post a proof with 8,202 configurations and an n-log-n coloring algorithm.
March 1st, 2026
January 1997
Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, Thomas simplify the proof
Proof

The four mathematicians reduce the configuration set to 633 and give a quadratic-time coloring algorithm; the community accepts it immediately.
January 1st, 1997
June 1976
Appel and Haken complete first computer proof
Proof

Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken use supercomputers at the University of Illinois to verify 1,482 configurations, sparking debate over computer-assisted proof.
June 1st, 1976
July 1879
Kempe publishes a proof with a hidden flaw
Proof attempt

Alfred Kempe's proof stands for a decade until Percy Heawood finds a fatal gap in 1890. The attempt inspires the unavoidable-set approach.
July 17th, 1879
October 1852
Francis Guthrie poses the four-color question
Conjecture

Guthrie asks whether four colors always suffice for a map; the question spreads through London mathematical circles.
October 23rd, 1852

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

July 1879 – 1890

Kempe's false proof (1879)

Alfred Kempe published a proof of the four-color theorem using an 'unavoidable set' of configurations he claimed were all reducible. Heawood found a flaw in 1890: one configuration resisted reduction. The approach was right, but the configuration set was wrong.

Then

The proof collapsed a decade after publication, and the theorem stayed open for another 86 years.

Now

Kempe's unavoidable-set framework became the backbone of every later proof, including the new one.

Why this matters now

The new proof uses the same framework Kempe introduced, refined by a far larger configuration set and modern computation.

June 1976

Appel-Haken computer proof (1976)

Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken spent years and used supercomputers at the University of Illinois to verify 1,482 configurations, publishing the first major computer-assisted proof in mathematics. The result was accepted but sparked a philosophical fight over whether computation counts as proof.

Then

Mathematicians argued for years about the status of the proof; some refused to accept it.

Now

The controversy normalized computer-assisted proof, and formal verification later became standard practice.

Why this matters now

The new proof is the third major computer-assisted proof of the theorem, continuing the tradition the Appel-Haken result started.

January 1997

Robertson-Sanders-Seymour-Thomas proof (1997)

Four mathematicians simplified Appel and Haken's proof, cutting the configuration set to 633 and using only 32 discharging rules. Their quadratic-time algorithm improved on Appel and Haken's quartic one, and the community accepted it immediately.

Then

The proof became the standard reference for the four-color theorem and the basis for practical graph coloring.

Now

Its quadratic algorithm stood as the best known for 29 years, until the new proof's near-linear result.

Why this matters now

The new proof's n-log-n algorithm directly supersedes the 1997 quadratic bound and was designed to address its inefficiency.