Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why Ranks Sign Up
Clarence Thomas

Clarence Thomas

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

Appears in 6 stories

Born: June 23, 1948 (age 77 years), Pin Point, Montgomery, GA
Spouse: Virginia Thomas (m. 1987) and Kathy Ambush (m. 1971–1984)
Children: Jamal Adeen Thomas
Education: Yale Law School (1974), College of the Holy Cross (1971), Conception Seminary College (1967–1968), and more
Height: 5′ 9″

Notable Quotes

The government required Fluor to hire Afghan employees and to provide logistics for Bagram Airfield. But it did not require Fluor to leave Nayeb unsupervised, allow him to walk alone for an hour after his shift, or permit him to obtain unauthorized tools with which he could build a bomb.

"Under our precedents, a company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights." — Majority opinion, Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment (2026)

In 1798, 'punishment' for a 'crime' would have been understood to refer to any coercive penalty for a public wrong. — Concurring Opinion

Stories

Supreme Court narrows military contractor immunity in Bagram bombing ruling

Rule Changes

Wrote the controlling opinion

For nearly four decades, military contractors have enjoyed broad immunity from injured service members' lawsuits under a doctrine extending the federal government's battlefield protections to its private partners. On April 22, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the shield has limits: when the government doesn't order or authorize the conduct that caused the injury, the contractor is on its own.

Updated May 31

Supreme Court rules ISPs not liable for subscribers' copyright infringement

Rule Changes

Authored 7-justice majority opinion

For more than a decade, major record labels have tried to make internet service providers pay for their subscribers' music piracy. On March 25, 2026, the Supreme Court shut that door unanimously. Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a 9-0 court, held that a company providing internet service cannot be held liable as a copyright infringer simply because it knows some customers will use that service to download music illegally.

Updated May 30

Supreme court rules restitution is criminal punishment

Rule Changes

Associate Justice, U.S. Supreme Court

Federal courts have debated for decades whether restitution is criminal punishment or a civil remedy—a distinction that matters because the Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause bars retroactive increases in criminal punishment. On January 20, 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is criminal punishment, so defendants cannot be held to payment terms that didn't exist when they committed their crimes.

Updated May 22

Supreme Court revives Cuba confiscation claims against cruise lines

Rule Changes

Author of the 8-1 majority opinion

For 23 years after Congress passed the Helms-Burton Act, every president from Clinton to Obama waived Americans' right to sue companies for using property Cuba seized in 1959. Thursday's 8-1 Supreme Court ruling reinstated the right to sue and revived a $440 million judgment against four cruise lines that docked in Havana between 2016 and 2019.

Updated May 22

Supreme Court leaves Atkins protections intact in Alabama death row case

Rule Changes

Wrote separate dissent calling to overrule Atkins

Joseph Clifton Smith has been on Alabama's death row since 1997. His five IQ tests came back at 72, 74, 74, 75, and 78. On Thursday, the Supreme Court dismissed Alabama's appeal in Hamm v. Smith, letting stand a lower-court finding that Smith is intellectually disabled and cannot be executed.

Updated May 21

The age verification wars

Rule Changes

Wrote majority opinion in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton

A federal judge blocked Texas from forcing Apple and Google to verify every app store user's age, calling the law akin to requiring ID checks at bookstore doors. This December 2024 ruling is the latest defeat in a wave of state attempts to age-gate the internet.

Updated May 16