Alexandria zoning board to revisit deck variance it denied in November
Rule Changes Alexandria, VA localVassalo and Savino seek rear-yard and open-space relief for 9 Potomac Court on September 14
July 22nd, 2026: BZA denies 2500 Dewitt Avenue variance 3-2New here? Follow stories to track developments over time. Create a free account to get updates when stories you care about change.
Overview
Updated 1 hour agoRonnie Vassalo Jr. and Mary Savino want to build a deck on their townhouse at 9 Potomac Court in Alexandria, Virginia. The zoning code's rear-yard and open-space rules don't allow it, so they've asked the Board of Zoning Appeals for a variance. On November 10, 2025, the board denied a previous request by a 3-2 vote; a new application goes to a public hearing on September 14.
The board is a citizen panel appointed by the city council that weighs whether a property owner faces an "unnecessary hardship" under state law. The September hearing lets neighbors speak before the vote. Approval clears the way to build; another denial would push the owners back to the drawing board or into court.
Why it matters
The September 14 vote decides whether the 9 Potomac Court deck gets built — and how much relief Alexandria zoning grants homeowners.
Questions about this story
Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.
No questions yet — be the first to ask.
Key Indicators
Voices
Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.
Play
Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.
Higher or Lower
A number from this story, against one from elsewhere in the news — guess which is bigger, then keep the chain going. 5 rounds, 3 strikes; a miss costs a strike and resets your streak.
Keyboard: ↓/L lower · ↑/H higher
0 points — sign up to put that on the leaderboard.
Timeline
Order five events from this story, oldest at top. Each in the right slot scores 1 — neighbours within one slot count too. Your previous result — green ✓ for exact slots, yellow ~ for off by one. Cards now in true chronological order.
Sign up to save your score and track a streak across stories.
Connections
Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Four mistakes max.
Sign up to keep a daily streak — a new puzzle lands every day.
Exit debate?
Your progress in this debate will be lost.
- 1 Two AI personas square off on this story.
- 2 You predict who'll win each round — correct picks earn XP.
- 3 One crossfire question is yours to fire. Pick it carefully.
Couldn't generate a topic
Select Your Champions
Choose one persona for each side of the debate
DEBATE TOPIC
Choose personas with different perspectives for a more dynamic debate.
Select debater for this side:
No debate personas available right now.
Select debater for this side:
No debate personas available right now.
Who's Got This Round?
Make your prediction before the referee scores
The referee scores both sides on
Round Results
Set the Crossfire
Pick the question both personas must answer in the final round
Debate Oracle! You called every round!
Sharp Instincts! You know your debaters!
The Coin Flip Strategist! Perfectly balanced!
The Contrarian! Bold predictions!
Inverse Genius! Try betting the opposite next time!
XP Breakdown
Prediction History
People Involved
Organizations Involved
Appointed by the city council, this seven-member board hears variance, special exception, and appeal cases.
City staff that manage zoning applications, prepare staff reports, and support the Board of Zoning Appeals docket.
Timeline
November 2025 September 2026
-
BZA public hearing for BZA2026-00010, 9 Potomac Court
Upcoming HearingThe board will hear the resubmitted request for variances to build a deck in the required rear yard and reduce required open space. Residents can speak before the vote.
-
BZA denies 2500 Dewitt Avenue variance 3-2
Latest DecisionThe board rejected another residential variance request by a narrow margin while approving a special exception at 414 Duke Street 5-0.
-
BZA denies 1030 Cross Drive variance 5-2
DecisionA month after the deferral, the board denied the Cross Drive variance on a 5-2 vote, showing its strictness on the merits.
-
BZA defers 1030 Cross Drive variance
DecisionThe board postponed a variance request for 1030 Cross Drive at the applicant's request, leaving the case open.
-
BZA denies original 9 Potomac Court deck variance
DecisionThe board rejected the first variance request for a deck at 9 Potomac Court by a 3-2 vote. It approved an ADU variance at 2500 Dewitt Avenue the same night, 6-0.
Historical Context
3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.
Same-night contrast: 2500 Dewitt Avenue ADU variance (November 2025)
On the same night the BZA denied the original 9 Potomac Court deck variance 3-2, it approved an accessory dwelling unit variance at 2500 Dewitt Avenue by a 6-0 vote.
The ADU variance was granted, allowing the property owner to proceed with construction.
Illustrates the board's case-by-case approach: clear constraints earn relief, less clear ones don't.
The September hearing tests whether the 9 Potomac Court applicants can make a hardship case as strong as the ADU one.
1030 Cross Drive variance denial (2026)
The BZA deferred a variance request at 1030 Cross Drive at the applicant's request in April 2026, then denied it 5-2 a month later. The applicant sought relief tied to the property's conditions but failed to clear the board's hardship bar.
The variance was denied, and the property owner had to rework the plan or pursue other options.
Reinforced the board's strict interpretation of Virginia's variance standard.
A deferral — one possible outcome of the September 14 hearing — often leads to a denial, not an approval, when the case returns.
Virginia's unnecessary hardship doctrine (established by state law)
Virginia law requires variance applicants to show that the property's peculiar conditions create a hardship that is not self-created, and that the relief won't harm the neighborhood. Courts apply this test strictly across the state.
Boards across Virginia deny variances when the hardship stems from the owner's own choices.
Kept the variance a narrow safety valve rather than a broad exception to zoning.
This is the exact standard the Alexandria BZA applies to the 9 Potomac Court request.
