Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
The push for practical superconductors

The push for practical superconductors

New Capabilities

Houston team breaks a 1993 record, reaching 151 Kelvin at normal pressure

May 27th, 2026: PNAS publishes 151K Hg1223 paper

Overview

For 33 years, a mercury-based ceramic held the record for superconductivity at normal atmospheric pressure: 133 Kelvin, set in 1993. Physicists at the University of Houston just pushed that mark 18 degrees higher.

Ching-Wu Chu and Liangzi Deng used a pressure-quench technique to lock a high-pressure superconducting state into the same mercury cuprate after the squeezing stopped. Their result, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, opens a path toward materials that could carry current without loss in ordinary conditions. The temperature still requires deep cooling, but every degree cuts costs.

Why it matters

Ambient-pressure superconductors are the kind you can actually build into a power grid; every degree gained brings lossless transmission closer.

Questions about this story

0

Does this make any applications commercially viable now?

Not yet — 151K is a record, but it still requires liquid nitrogen cooling, the same infrastructure commercial superconductors already use, and the pressure-quench manufacturing method has no proven path to industrial scale.

Why it matters: The real unlock for truly new applications is room-temperature superconductivity, which remains roughly 122°C away.

  • Liquid nitrogen cools to 77K, well below 151K — so this material works with existing cooling infrastructure, but so does YBCO (93K), which has been commercial since the 1990s in MRI machines, fusion magnets, and power cables.
  • The pressure-quench technique uses diamond anvil cells — lab instruments that work on tiny samples. Scaling that process to produce bulk wire or tape is an unsolved manufacturing problem.
  • Mercury cuprates are brittle ceramics that can't easily be drawn into wires, the standard form for grid and magnet applications — the same fabrication wall that blocked the 133K material set in 1993.
  • Companies like Veir (HTS power cables) and Microsoft (HTS for data center cooling) are already pursuing commercialization based on existing 77K-class materials, not waiting for higher Tc records.
Room for disagreement
  • Chu's camp argues the pressure-quench method is a genuine technique shift — not just a higher number — because it shows a new way to stabilize high-pressure phases at ambient conditions, potentially applicable to other material families, which could eventually yield something more manufacturable. Critics, including coverage at Tom's Hardware, counter that 151K is scientifically interesting but practically incremental: the cooling infrastructure and fabrication problems are identical to what blocked the 1993 record, and the distance to room temperature dwarfs the 18-degree gain.
AI-generated with web search — may be wrong. Check the linked sources.

Key Indicators

151 K
New ambient-pressure Tc
The temperature at which the pressure-quenched mercury cuprate begins superconducting at one atmosphere.
+18 K
Gain over 1993 record
The improvement over Schilling's Hg1223 result that stood from 1993 until 2026.
33 yrs
How long the old record held
Time between the original Hg1223 result and the Houston team's break.
1 atm
Operating pressure
Normal atmospheric pressure — the regime that matters for power lines, MRI magnets, and fusion coils.
~140 K
Distance to room temperature
The gap between today's ambient-pressure record and a true room-temperature superconductor.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Higher or Lower Two numbers from this story. Guess which is bigger. 5 rounds to set a streak. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

April 1911 May 2026

9 events Latest: May 27th, 2026 · 1 month ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. PNAS publishes 151K Hg1223 paper

    Latest Publication

    Deng and Chu's pressure-quenched Hg1223 result is published in PNAS, formally breaking the 1993 record by 18 degrees.

  2. University of Houston announces 151K result

    Announcement

    UH publicizes the Hg1223 pressure-quench result; a preprint goes up on arXiv ahead of formal publication.

  3. Pressure-quench protocol proof-of-concept

    Publication

    Deng and Chu publish in PNAS a pressure-quench method that locks high-pressure superconductivity in Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 at ambient pressure.

  4. Ranga Dias room-temperature claim retracted

    Retraction

    Nature retracts Dias's 2023 room-temperature superconductivity paper after misconduct findings, raising the bar for new claims.

  5. Sulfur hydride reaches 203K under extreme pressure

    Discovery

    Hydrogen sulfide superconducts at 203K, but only under about 150 gigapascals of pressure.

  6. Hg1223 sets the long-standing ambient-pressure record

    Discovery

    Schilling and colleagues report HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ superconducting at 133K, a record that holds for 33 years.

  7. YBCO breaks the liquid nitrogen barrier

    Discovery

    Chu and Wu announce YBa2Cu3O7 superconductivity at 93K, the first material that works above liquid nitrogen temperature.

  8. Bednorz and Müller find ceramic superconductivity

    Discovery

    IBM Zurich researchers report superconductivity at 35K in a lanthanum-barium-copper-oxide ceramic, opening the cuprate era.

  9. Onnes discovers superconductivity

    Discovery

    Heike Kamerlingh Onnes finds that mercury loses electrical resistance at 4.2K.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

March 1987

YBCO breaks the liquid-nitrogen barrier (1987)

Paul Chu and Maw-Kuen Wu reported YBa2Cu3O7 superconducting at 93 Kelvin, lifting the previous Tc record by more than 50 degrees in a single jump. Their result crossed liquid nitrogen's boiling point of 77K, meaning a superconductor could be cooled by a coolant that costs roughly the same as milk.

Then

Hundreds of labs piled into cuprate research. Tc records fell almost monthly through 1987 and 1988.

Now

Cuprate superconductors became the basis for commercial superconducting magnets and high-current cables used today in MRI, particle accelerators, and grid demonstrations.

Why this matters now

The same Chu lab is now behind the 2026 result, and the same family of cuprates is being squeezed into a new record. Past YBCO results were replicated within weeks; the 151K finding has not yet been independently confirmed.

May 1993

Hg1223 sets the 1993 ambient-pressure ceiling

Andreas Schilling and colleagues at ETH Zurich reported HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ superconducting at 133K at atmospheric pressure, in Nature. The mercury cuprate sat at the top of the ambient-pressure table for 33 years.

Then

Higher Tc values were claimed only under applied pressure, where Hg1223 reaches about 164K.

Now

Practical wire and tape production focused on cuprates with lower Tc but better mechanical properties, leaving Hg1223 mostly a benchmark material rather than an engineered one.

Why this matters now

The 2026 result is the same compound, treated with a new process. The arc of ambient-pressure progress effectively skipped a generation between Schilling and Deng-Chu.

September 2022 to November 2024

The Ranga Dias retractions (2022 to 2024)

Nature retracted two high-profile papers by University of Rochester physicist Ranga Dias claiming room-temperature superconductivity, after data manipulation findings and replication failures. A 2023 paper claiming 21°C superconductivity in a nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride was retracted in November 2023.

Then

Funding agencies tightened review of superconductor claims. Several labs that built equipment to test Dias's recipes reported no superconductivity.

Now

Editors and reviewers now demand more independent verification before accepting room-temperature claims, especially those involving extreme pressure.

Why this matters now

The Dias episode set the standard the Houston result has to clear. PNAS review and Chu's track record help, but independent replication is now the bar that matters.

Sources

(17)