Muskrat v. United States (1911)
Congress passed a law to put Cherokee allotment and pension changes before the Supreme Court, with actual Indian claimants as parties, seeking a ruling on constitutionality. The Court refused to hear it, holding there was no real controversy because the parties were aligned.
The Court dismissed the suits for want of jurisdiction, confirming federal courts only decide disputes between genuinely adverse parties.
It established that test cases and collusive suits are not justiciable, a cornerstone of standing doctrine.
Judge Williams applied the same principle, finding Trump's suit had no adversity because he controls the defendant agencies.
