Nahant can use eminent domain to block Northeastern research center, court rules

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

Nahant can condemn a 20-acre parcel owned by Northeastern University and block a planned marine research center. Massachusetts' highest court ruled that preserving the town's scenic quality is a 'quintessential' public use for eminent domain.

The ruling flips the usual eminent-domain script: governments normally seize land to enable development, not to stop it. The property was offered to Nahant as a public park in the 1960s, when officials refused it, worried about visitors from Boston, Somerville, and Chelsea. Northeastern bought the land years later and proposed a 55,000-square-foot research center in 2018.

Why it matters

Massachusetts towns can now use scenic preservation as legal grounds to seize land and block construction, a new weapon in local development fights.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Play on this story Voices Debate Predict Higher or Lower Connections

Key Indicators

Acres at stake

The 20-acre former military parcel Northeastern owns in Nahant.

55,000

Square feet of proposed facility

Size of the marine research center Northeastern planned to build.

Years of conflict

Since Nahant first rejected the land as a public park in the 1960s.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Most of these play right now — no account needed. Sign up to save scores, keep a streak, and unlock Debate and Predict. Log in Sign Up

Predict 3 ways this could play out. Back the one you believe — contrarian picks score more when a scenario has a resolution date. Log in to play

Organizations Involved

Town of Nahant

Municipal government

Prevailed in Supreme Judicial Court ruling

Small coastal town that used eminent domain to block Northeastern University's marine research center.

Northeastern University

Private research university

Lost legal ruling; marine research center project in jeopardy

Boston university that proposed a 55,000-square-foot marine research center on its Nahant property.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

State supreme court

Ruled for Nahant in September 2026

The highest court in Massachusetts, which ruled that scenic preservation is a 'quintessential' public purpose for eminent domain.

Timeline

January 1960 September 2026

3 events Latest: 3 days ago

September 2026
SJC rules Nahant can use eminent domain
Latest Court ruling

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court reverses a Superior Court decision, ruling scenic preservation is a 'quintessential' public use and the town acted in good faith.
3 days ago
January 2018
Northeastern proposes marine research center
Proposal

The Boston university proposes a 55,000-square-foot marine research center on the 20-acre parcel it owns in Nahant.
January 1st, 2018
January 1960
Nahant rejects military land as public park
Land-use decision

Town officials refuse the former military installation as a seaside park, with one official citing fears about visitors from Boston, Somerville, and Chelsea.
January 1st, 1960

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

March 1975

Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (1975)

New Jersey's Supreme Court struck down Mount Laurel's zoning rules that excluded affordable housing, ruling that municipalities can't use land-use powers to keep out lower-income residents.

Then

Mount Laurel was ordered to allow affordable housing; the doctrine expanded across New Jersey through the Fair Housing Act.

Now

The Mount Laurel doctrine remains central to exclusionary land-use law, though many local governments still resist affordable housing mandates.

Why this matters now

Nahant's documented 1960s fear of 'the wrong sort of people' raises the same concern — local power used to shape who can access a community. The SJC didn't rule on exclusionary intent, but the history hangs over the decision.

March 1981

Poletown Neighborhood Council v. City of Detroit (1981)

Detroit condemned a 465-acre working-class Polish neighborhood — homes, churches, and businesses — and handed it to General Motors for a Cadillac assembly plant. The Michigan Supreme Court upheld the taking.

Then

About 1,500 homes and 100 businesses were demolished; GM built the plant but employed far fewer workers than promised.

Now

Michigan's Supreme Court reversed the precedent in 2004, ruling that eminent domain for private economic benefit violates the state constitution.

Why this matters now

Another famous case of aggressive eminent domain, but one supporting development against a community's wishes. Nahant reverses the direction, with the community using state power against a developer.

June 2005

Kelo v. New London (2005)

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that New London, Connecticut could condemn homes in the working-class Fort Trumbull neighborhood to make way for a Pfizer research facility and private development. The case became a national controversy over eminent domain abuse.

Then

Susette Kelo's home was eventually bulldozed, but Pfizer left New London and the planned development collapsed, leaving the land vacant.

Now

The ruling triggered a wave of state laws restricting eminent domain; more than 40 states tightened their rules.

Why this matters now

Kelo shows courts usually bless eminent domain when it enables development. Nahant's case is the reverse — a municipality using the power to block development, with scenic preservation as the stated purpose.