Pull to refresh
Logo
California voters reject 5% tax on billionaires

California voters reject 5% tax on billionaires

Rule Changes

Proposition 40 would have charged roughly 200 residents a one-time 5% levy on net worth above $1.1 billion.

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

California voters rejected Proposition 40, a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of residents worth more than $1.1 billion. The measure lost about 56% to 44% after a campaign that drew more than $330 million in opposition spending.

Supporters had projected $100 billion over five years, mostly for the state's Medicaid program. Opponents argued the tax would push billionaires out of California; at least seven had already left before Election Day.

Why it matters

The tax would have raised tens of billions for Medicaid and schools. California voters rejected it, leaving that funding gap open.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

5%
Tax rate on net worth
One-time levy proposed under Proposition 40.
$1.1B
Wealth threshold
Residents above this net worth would have owed the tax.
~200
Billionaires affected
Estimated number of Californians above the threshold.
$100B
Projected five-year revenue
Supporters' estimate, mostly for Medicaid.
55.6%
Share voting No
Projected result as of Nov. 10.
$330M
Opposition spending
Raised by opponents, according to Oxfam.
$38.9B
Estimated net loss
Stanford economists' projection from billionaire departures.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

4 events Latest: Today
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Media projections call race for No

    Today Results

    Projections show No leading 55.6% to 44.4%.

  2. Stanford paper projects $38.9 billion net loss

    Analysis

    Economists warn departures could outweigh revenue; seven billionaires have left.

  3. Early count shows measure trailing

    Results

    With 77% of votes counted, about 53% opposed the tax.

  4. Californians vote on Proposition 40

    Election

    Election Day; voters decide on a one-time 5% tax on billionaires.

Scenarios

1

California's income-tax receipts hold steady

Possible Resolves by Nov 10, 2027

Discussed by: Fox Business, citing economist Wayne Winegarden

With the wealth tax off the ballot, the departures tied to it stop and revenue from high earners levels off. Winegarden argued the 'continued bleeding' should stop without the measure.

2

A wealth tax returns to a statewide ballot by 2028

Possible Resolves by Nov 7, 2028

Discussed by: Oxfam and supporters of Proposition 40

Supporters treat the loss as a temporary setback and organize in other states. A copycat measure qualifies for a statewide ballot before the 2028 general election.

3

Medi-Cal cuts follow the tax's defeat

Possible Resolves by Q2 2028

Discussed by: Supporters and the Legislative Analyst's Office

The $100 billion never arrives, and federal Medicaid cuts force California to trim coverage. The state enacts mid-year reductions.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

1982–2017

France replaces its wealth tax (2017)

France taxed large fortunes annually starting in 1982. In 2017, President Emmanuel Macron replaced the levy with a tax limited to real estate, arguing the old version discouraged investment.

Then

Wealthy households got relief on financial assets; the government said the change would draw capital.

Now

France still taxes real estate wealth, and the capital-flight argument remains central to French tax debates.

2022

Spain adds a solidarity tax on large fortunes (2022)

Spain's government introduced a temporary tax on net wealth above €3 million, layered on top of regional wealth taxes. It was meant to fund cost-of-living measures.

Then

The levy applied to a small share of taxpayers.

Now

The measure showed that national governments can override regional tax competition on wealth.

Sources

(10)