Pull to refresh
Logo
China picks first researchers for 15-year mega grants

China picks first researchers for 15-year mega grants

Money Moves

NSFC backs 44 young scientists with no short-term performance reviews

Today: Nature reports the selection

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

China's main science funder has picked its first 44 researchers for grants lasting up to 15 years. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) chose scientists under 35 — women under 38 — including 9 based overseas, for one of the longest research grants offered anywhere.

The grants run on a '5+5+5' structure: 4 million yuan for the first five years, doubling to 8 million, then 16 million. The only performance check is physical presence in the lab — no short-term targets. The bet is that patient money produces breakthroughs that five-year cycles cut short.

Why it matters

If the model works, it could pull young researchers toward China and reshape how the country funds risky, long-horizon science.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

44
Researchers selected
First cohort of the National Distinguished Young Scientists Fund's 15-year track.
15 years
Maximum grant duration
Structured as three five-year phases, with funding doubling each phase.
4M yuan
Initial 5-year grant value
Roughly US$596,000, doubling to 8M yuan then 16M yuan in later phases.
9
Researchers based outside China
The rest of the 44 are based in mainland China.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

2023 October 2026

5 events Latest: Today
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Nature reports the selection

    Today Media

    The journal confirms the first cohort of 15-year grant recipients, calling it one of the longest research grants offered globally.

  2. Dou announces first 44 selections at Shenzhen forum

    Announcement

    NSFC president Dou Xiankang reveals 44 researchers under 35 were chosen, including 9 based overseas.

  3. Exit rules take effect for tech-security risks

    Regulation

    New rules let authorities stop anyone judged a risk to China's technological security from leaving the country.

  4. NSFC pledges 50% boost to early-career grants

    Policy

    The agency adds 12,000 projects through its Young Scientists Fund for early-career researchers.

  5. NSFC announces plans for 15-year grants

    Policy

    China's main science funder unveils plans for grants lasting up to 15 years, with funding doubling every five years.

Scenarios

1

NSFC expands 15-year grants to a second cohort

Likely Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Nature, Times Higher Education

If the first cohort shows promise, the NSFC could announce a second round of selections. Dou has said the agency is in talks with the Central Organization Department to create overlapping support for researchers under 30. The program's early success would signal a permanent shift in how China funds young scientists.

2

Overseas-based recipients decline to relocate to China

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Times Higher Education, Asia Times

Only 9 of 44 selected researchers are based overseas. Experts note strict residency mandates, data-governance laws, and new exit rules could deter foreign-based scientists from committing to 15 years in China. One anonymous Chinese scholar in the UK said limited cross-border communication may stifle the open exchange needed for innovation.

3

A recipient wins a major international prize for grant-supported work

Uncertain Resolves by End of 2031

Discussed by: Asia Times

The 15-year horizon is designed to let researchers fail and try again. A Fields Medal, Nobel, or Breakthrough Prize for work supported by the grant would validate the model. The first grants don't expire until around 2041, so the payoff window is long.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

Ongoing since the 1980s

Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator model

The Howard Hughes Medical Institute began appointing investigators for seven-year terms, funding people rather than specific projects. Investigators were free to change research direction without re-applying for grants.

Then

A study by economists Pierre Azoulay, Joshua Graff Zivin, and Gustavo Manso found HHMI investigators produced about twice as many highly cited papers as comparable NIH-funded scientists — and more flops.

Now

The model became a benchmark for patient capital in science, showing that tolerance for failure correlates with breakthrough output.

Why this matters now

China's 15-year grants adopt the same 'people, not projects' logic, betting that long horizons and failure tolerance produce breakthroughs.

2008 onward

China's Thousand Talents Plan (2008)

China launched a national program to recruit overseas Chinese scientists with large grants and lab support. It drew thousands of researchers back to Chinese universities and institutes.

Then

The plan brought significant talent back to China but drew scrutiny in the US over espionage concerns.

Now

Retention was mixed; some recruits returned abroad, and later iterations of the program adjusted terms to improve retention.

Why this matters now

The 15-year grants are the latest iteration of China's effort to attract and keep top scientific talent, with longer commitments than earlier programs.

Sources

(6)