Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
Corporate transparency act: from 33 million companies to legal limbo

Corporate transparency act: from 33 million companies to legal limbo

Rule Changes

Courts, Congress, and two administrations battle over who must disclose business ownership

December 16th, 2025: Eleventh Circuit Unanimously Upholds CTA

Overview

Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act in 2021 to crack down on shell companies used for money laundering and terrorist financing, requiring 33 million U.S. businesses to report their true owners to FinCEN. Courts in Alabama and Texas declared it likely unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court stepped in. Within hours, a second Texas judge issued a nationwide injunction. Now the law exists in regulatory purgatory.

The Eleventh Circuit upheld it as constitutional in December 2025. In March, the Trump Treasury Department exempted all domestic companies—shrinking the pool from 33 million to roughly 12,000 foreign entities. What began as the biggest anti-money laundering reform in decades has become a case study in judicial ping-pong and administrative reversal.

Questions about this story

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Play on this story Voices Debate Predict

Key Indicators

33M → 12K
Companies Affected
Law originally covered 33 million U.S. businesses, now applies to roughly 12,000 foreign entities after March 2025 rule change
6
Court Cases
Multiple constitutional challenges filed across Alabama and Texas federal courts
5
Nationwide Injunctions
Number of times enforcement was blocked or reinstated by courts between December 2024 and February 2025
Jan 7, 2025
Smith Injunction Date
Same day Supreme Court lifted separate injunction in Texas Top Cop Shop case

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

January 2021 December 2025

17 events Latest: December 16th, 2025 · 6 months ago Showing 8 of 17
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. FinCEN Exempts All Domestic Companies

    Regulatory

    Interim final rule redefines "reporting company" to mean only foreign entities registered in U.S., exempting all 33 million domestic companies and shrinking scope to 12,000 businesses.

  2. Trump Treasury Announces Enforcement Suspension

    Policy

    Department of Treasury announces it will suspend CTA enforcement against U.S. citizens and domestic reporting companies, signaling major policy reversal.

  3. FinCEN Begins Accepting Reports

    Implementation

    Beneficial ownership information registry opens. Existing companies have until January 1, 2025 to file; new companies created in 2024 have 90 days from formation.

  4. FinCEN Publishes Reporting Rule

    Regulatory

    Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issues regulations requiring 33 million reporting companies to disclose beneficial ownership information, with implementation beginning January 2024.

  5. Corporate Transparency Act Becomes Law

    Legislative

    Congress overrides Trump veto of National Defense Authorization Act, enacting the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 containing the CTA. Law targets anonymous shell companies used for money laundering and terrorist financing.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

2012-2021

Affordable Care Act Individual Mandate Litigation

The Supreme Court rejected constitutional challenges to the ACA three times over nine years. First, Chief Justice Roberts upheld the individual mandate as a tax in 2012. Then the Court preserved subsidies in King v. Burwell in 2015. Finally, in 2021, the Court dismissed a third challenge on standing grounds. Justice Alito called it the Court's "epic Affordable Care Act trilogy," each time pulling off an "improbable rescue" of the law when it faced serious threats.

Then

The ACA survived repeated attempts to dismantle it through litigation despite initial constitutional doubts.

Now

The law became entrenched despite ongoing political opposition, with courts increasingly reluctant to second-guess major legislation.

Why this matters now

Like the ACA, the CTA faces a pattern of repeated legal challenges and Supreme Court interventions, with the law surviving on narrow procedural or technical grounds even as its practical enforcement changes dramatically.

2017-2025

Trump-Biden Regulatory Whiplash

The Trump administration rolled back over 100 environmental rules, while Biden reversed 62 of Trump's 219 executive orders in his first 100 days. Federal courts upheld Trump-era environmental rules in only 20 percent of challenges, versus the historical 70 percent rate. The Biden administration used litigation abeyances, Congressional Review Act repeals, and delayed implementation to reverse Trump policies. The second Trump administration immediately began reversing Biden's late-term regulations on emissions, overtime pay, and healthcare.

Then

Businesses faced compliance uncertainty as rules changed with each administration, making long-term planning impossible.

Now

Regulatory stability eroded as partisan rule-making and swift reversals became normalized across administrations.

Why this matters now

The CTA's trajectory from Biden enforcement to Trump exemption mirrors the broader pattern of regulatory flip-flopping between administrations, leaving businesses in perpetual uncertainty about compliance obligations.

1970-present

Bank Secrecy Act Creates Financial Institution Reporting Regime

Congress passed the Bank Secrecy Act in 1970, requiring financial institutions to report cash transactions over $10,000 and file suspicious activity reports to help detect money laundering. Banks became responsible for customer due diligence, including verifying beneficial ownership of business accounts. The law survived constitutional challenges and created FinCEN as the enforcement agency. Over five decades, reporting requirements expanded to cover more transaction types and lower thresholds.

Then

Banks absorbed significant compliance costs, passing customer information to law enforcement on a massive scale.

Now

The BSA became accepted infrastructure for anti-money laundering efforts, with financial institutions accepting their role as government reporting agents.

Why this matters now

The CTA attempted to shift beneficial ownership reporting from financial institutions to the companies themselves, but after Trump's exemption of domestic companies, banks remain the primary gatekeepers under BSA requirements—returning to the pre-CTA status quo.

Sources

(8)