Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why
Federal government builds digital permitting stack for environmental reviews

Federal government builds digital permitting stack for environmental reviews

New Capabilities
By Newzino Staff | |

After 55 years of paper-based processes, a nascent software infrastructure for NEPA permitting is being assembled in the open

3 days ago: CEQ Formally Repeals NEPA Implementing Regulations

Overview

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has governed federal environmental reviews since 1970. For most of that time, the process has run on paper documents, siloed databases, and ad hoc searches across agencies. Now, for the first time, the federal government is assembling a public digital stack for permitting: a common data standard, a searchable database of 2,290 categorical exclusions across 60-plus agencies, a workflow tool for completing environmental reviews digitally, and developer resources built around application programming interfaces (APIs) and shared schemas.

The January 29, 2026 launch of CE Works — a pilot tool that lets Bureau of Land Management (BLM) staff in Moab, Utah select, route, and approve categorical exclusion determinations digitally — is the latest piece. But the underreported story is the stack itself. In roughly ten months, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and the General Services Administration (GSA) have shipped a data standard, a public reference dataset, a workflow tool, and implementation resources that together form infrastructure other agencies can build on. If this architecture holds, it could compress a process where federal staff once spent months searching for cross-agency permitting precedents into one where that information is available in minutes.

Key Indicators

2,290
Categorical exclusions digitized
Number of federal categorical exclusions searchable in the CE Explorer database across 60-plus agencies
120,000
NEPA documents in AI corpus
Environmental review documents spanning 50-plus years indexed in the Department of Energy's NEPATEC 2.0 dataset
4.5 years
Average environmental impact statement
Average completion time for a full Environmental Impact Statement over the past decade, the bottleneck this stack aims to reduce
10 months
Stack assembly time
Time from the presidential memorandum in April 2025 to the CE Works pilot launch in January 2026

Interactive

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Sign Up

Debate Arena

Two rounds, two personas, one winner. You set the crossfire.

People Involved

Katherine Scarlett
Katherine Scarlett
Chair, Council on Environmental Quality (Confirmed as 13th CEQ Chair, September 2025)

Organizations Involved

Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
White House Office
Status: Leading permitting technology modernization effort

The White House office that oversees implementation of NEPA across all federal agencies and now leads the Permitting Innovation Center building digital permitting tools.

PE
Permitting Innovation Center
Interagency Program Office
Status: Actively shipping tools and standards

The interagency center established to design, prototype, and test digital tools for federal environmental review and permitting.

General Services Administration — Technology Transformation Services
General Services Administration — Technology Transformation Services
Federal Agency Division
Status: Technical partner building permitting tools

GSA's technology arm that collaborates with CEQ to design and host the digital permitting tools, including developer resources with API specifications and shared schemas.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
Department of Energy National Laboratory
Status: Building AI-powered NEPA document corpus and search tools

The Department of Energy national laboratory developing NEPATEC 2.0 and PermitAI — an AI-enriched corpus of 120,000 NEPA documents and a search interface for federal reviewers.

Timeline

  1. CEQ Formally Repeals NEPA Implementing Regulations

    Regulatory

    CEQ Chair Katherine Scarlett finalizes removal of NEPA implementing regulations, marking a significant deregulatory shift. Scarlett states that under the Trump administration, 'NEPA's regulatory reign of terror has ended,' creating a new regulatory environment for environmental reviews.

  2. Senate Introduces Bipartisan ePermit Act Companion Bill

    Legislative

    Senators John Curtis (R-UT), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Dave McCormick (R-PA), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Steve Daines (R-MT), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Ted Budd (R-NC), and Alex Padilla (D-CA) introduce the Senate companion to the House-passed ePermit Act, codifying digital permitting requirements and cloud-based platforms across federal agencies.

  3. CE Works Pilot Launches with BLM Moab Field Office

    Technology

    CEQ launches CE Works, a digital workflow tool that lets agency staff select a categorical exclusion, collaborate with resource experts, route for approval, and generate a publishable record. The pilot begins with the Bureau of Land Management's Moab, Utah field office.

  4. PNNL Releases NEPATEC 2.0 AI Corpus

    Technology

    The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory publishes NEPATEC 2.0, a machine-readable dataset of roughly 120,000 NEPA documents from 60,000 projects across more than 60 agencies, and begins beta-testing SearchNEPA, an AI-powered plain-language search interface.

  5. NEPA Data and Technology Standard v1.2 Published

    Standards

    CEQ releases version 1.2 of the government-wide NEPA data standard, defining a common schema across nine entities — projects, processes, documents, comments, public engagement, case events, geographic data, user roles, and legal structures — to enable interoperability between agency systems.

  6. Bipartisan ePermit Act Introduced in Congress

    Legislative

    Representatives Dusty Johnson (R-SD) and Scott Peters (D-CA) introduce the ePermit Act to codify digital permitting requirements, including data standards and a unified portal. The bill later passes the House unanimously.

  7. CE Explorer Launches as First Public Tool

    Technology

    The Permitting Innovation Center debuts CE Explorer, a searchable public database of 2,290 federal categorical exclusions across agencies, with machine-readable downloadable data.

  8. Permitting Technology Action Plan Released

    Policy

    CEQ publishes the Permitting Technology Action Plan, establishing data standards, minimum software requirements for agency systems, an implementation timeline, and a governance structure. Agencies are given 90 days to begin adopting the standards.

  9. CEQ Establishes Permitting Innovation Center

    Institutional

    CEQ formally creates the Permitting Innovation Center, staffed by CEQ and supported by GSA's Technology Transformation Services, to design and test prototype permitting tools.

  10. Presidential Memorandum Orders Permitting Tech Modernization

    Executive Action

    President Trump signs "Updating Permitting Technology for the 21st Century," directing CEQ to establish a Permitting Innovation Center and issue a technology action plan within 45 days.

  11. First NEPA Amendments Since 1970

    Legislative

    The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 amends NEPA for the first time, establishing a process for agencies to adopt other agencies' categorical exclusions and capping Environmental Impact Statements at 150 pages.

  12. FAST-41 Creates Federal Permitting Dashboard

    Legislative

    Title 41 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act establishes the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council and a public online dashboard for tracking covered infrastructure projects — an earlier transparency effort, though not a full digital workflow system.

  13. NEPA Signed into Law

    Legislative

    President Nixon signs the National Environmental Policy Act, requiring federal agencies to evaluate the environmental effects of major proposed actions. CEQ is established to oversee implementation.

Scenarios

1

Digital Permitting Stack Scales Across Federal Agencies

Discussed by: National Association of Manufacturers, Environmental Policy Innovation Center, Bipartisan Policy Center

If CEQ expands the CE Works pilot beyond the BLM Moab office successfully and agencies adopt the data standard as directed, a critical mass of federal environmental reviews could move onto interoperable digital systems within two to three years. The ePermit Act — which passed the House unanimously and has bipartisan Senate sponsors — would codify these requirements into law, making the architecture durable across administrations. In this scenario, routine categorical exclusion determinations (the majority of NEPA actions) shift from weeks of ad hoc document searches to structured digital workflows, and the time savings compound as more agencies contribute data to common systems.

2

Agencies Resist, Stack Fragments into Bespoke Systems

Discussed by: Environmental Policy Innovation Center, Federal technology analysts, Congressional Research Service

Federal agencies have a long history of building or buying their own IT systems that don't talk to each other. Despite CEQ's data standard, agencies could implement it superficially — meeting the letter of the requirement while maintaining incompatible internal systems. Without sustained funding, technical support, and enforcement, the Permitting Innovation Center's tools could remain pilot-scale while agencies continue using legacy workflows. The 2023 Fiscal Responsibility Act's cross-agency CE adoption provision could remain underused if the digital infrastructure to make it practical doesn't scale.

3

Policy Fights Over NEPA Override Technology Progress

Discussed by: Harvard Environmental and Energy Law Program, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, environmental advocacy groups

The Trump administration is simultaneously pursuing broader NEPA deregulation — including a January 2026 proposed rule to remove CEQ's NEPA implementing regulations entirely. If permitting technology modernization becomes entangled with polarized debates over whether NEPA review requirements should exist at all, political opposition could slow or defund the technology buildout. Environmental groups that support NEPA review rigor but oppose regulatory rollbacks may resist tools perceived as accelerating approvals at the expense of environmental scrutiny, even if the technology itself is neutral infrastructure.

4

Technology Layer Persists, Outlasts Policy Swings

Discussed by: Environmental Policy Innovation Center, government technology observers, GSA digital services advocates

Public data standards, open APIs, and searchable databases tend to outlast the administrations that create them — the FAST-41 Permitting Dashboard created under Obama in 2015 still operates a decade later. If the Permitting Innovation Center's tools reach a level of utility where agency staff depend on them for daily work, the technology infrastructure could become durable regardless of which party controls the White House. The ePermit Act's bipartisan support — unanimous House passage, eight Senate cosponsors from both parties — suggests the digitization effort specifically may be more resilient than the broader NEPA policy debate.

5

Deregulation Undermines Technology Adoption Incentives

Discussed by: Environmental policy analysts, federal technology observers

CEQ's January-February 2026 repeal of NEPA implementing regulations creates a paradox: the agency is simultaneously building digital tools to streamline environmental review while removing the regulatory framework that makes rigorous review necessary. If agencies interpret the deregulated environment as permission to minimize environmental scrutiny, the technology stack could become a tool for faster approvals rather than better-informed decisions. This could alienate environmental groups and complicate Senate passage of the ePermit Act, which frames digitization as improving transparency and coordination, not weakening environmental standards.

Historical Context

FAST-41 Permitting Dashboard (2015)

December 2015

What Happened

Title 41 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act created the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council and a public online dashboard to track timelines for major infrastructure projects requiring federal permits. The effort launched with 34 covered projects and established a 16-agency steering council to coordinate reviews.

Outcome

Short Term

The dashboard provided unprecedented transparency into permitting timelines, letting project sponsors and the public track where reviews stood across agencies.

Long Term

The dashboard still operates a decade later, but it tracked projects rather than transforming the underlying review process. Agencies continued using their own siloed systems; average Environmental Impact Statement timelines remained at 4.5 years.

Why It's Relevant Today

The current effort goes beyond FAST-41's tracking approach by building the actual workflow tools and data standards agencies use to conduct reviews. The contrast illustrates the difference between transparency (watching the process) and capability (changing the process).

Estonia's X-Road Digital Government Infrastructure (2001-present)

2001 - present

What Happened

Estonia built X-Road, a decentralized data exchange layer that lets government systems share information through standardized APIs. Starting with basic services, the system expanded to connect nearly all government databases. By 2024, Estonia declared 100% of government services digitalized, estimating the reduced bureaucracy saves the equivalent of 800 working years annually.

Outcome

Short Term

Government processes that previously required in-person visits and paper forms moved online, with business registration dropping to 15 minutes and tax filing to under 3 minutes.

Long Term

The interoperability layer became foundational infrastructure that subsequent governments built upon regardless of political changes, demonstrating that well-designed government technology platforms can persist across administrations.

Why It's Relevant Today

The CEQ data standard and API-based architecture mirror Estonia's interoperability-first approach. The question is whether a U.S. federal system — far larger and more fragmented — can achieve similar results, and whether the standards will reach the critical mass needed to become self-sustaining infrastructure.

Fiscal Responsibility Act NEPA Amendments (2023)

June 2023

What Happened

Congress amended NEPA for the first time since its 1970 enactment as part of the bipartisan debt ceiling deal. The amendments established a process for agencies to adopt other agencies' categorical exclusions, capped Environmental Impact Statements at 150 pages, and narrowed the scope of required environmental analysis to "reasonably foreseeable" effects.

Outcome

Short Term

The amendments created a legal framework for cross-agency categorical exclusion sharing, but without digital tools to make that sharing practical, uptake was limited.

Long Term

The provision served as a policy enabler waiting for technology to catch up. CE Explorer and CE Works directly operationalize what the 2023 law made legally possible — agencies can now actually find and use each other's categorical exclusions through a searchable interface.

Why It's Relevant Today

This is the direct policy precursor to the technology being built now. The 2023 law said agencies could share categorical exclusions; the 2025-2026 technology stack makes it practically possible for the first time.

24 Sources: