Pull to refresh
Logo
French Assembly backs per-gigabyte tax on streaming and cloud traffic

French Assembly backs per-gigabyte tax on streaming and cloud traffic

Rule Changes

Amendment I-1358 passed 11 votes to 10 and would charge content providers €0.055 for every gigabyte delivered to French users. It is not law yet.

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

France's National Assembly voted 11-10 on October 30 to charge content providers €0.055 for every gigabyte they send to internet users in France. The amendment, filed three weeks earlier by Socialist deputy Laurent Lhardit, would add a tax on "digital data producers" to the French tax code.

Nothing is enacted. The vote is a first-reading step in the 2027 finance bill, the government argued against it, and the text can still be rewritten or dropped. If it survives, internet access providers would meter traffic and the tax administration would bill the senders, with a cap of 15% of French turnover or 2% of global turnover.

Why it matters

If it survives, every gigabyte of video, game update and cloud sync sent to France carries a price, and subscriptions are where it lands.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

€0.055
Charge per gigabyte
The rate applied to each gigabyte of data recorded as delivered to French subscribers.
11–10
Assembly vote margin
Fourteen deputies abstained; 35 of 577 took part in the vote.
35
Deputies present for the vote
Out of 577 seats in the National Assembly.
€10 billion
Projected annual yield
The authors' estimate; the amendment's own traffic figures imply about €11 billion before the cap.
200 billion GB
Annual traffic to French subscribers
Arcep estimate cited in the amendment's written justification.
15%
Cap on French turnover
The text also caps the levy at 2% of a company's total worldwide turnover.
68
Signatories on the amendment
Includes former president François Hollande, Olivier Faure and Boris Vallaud.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

4 events Latest: Yesterday
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Assembly adopts the gigabyte levy, 11 votes to 10

    Latest Vote

    Fourteen deputies abstain and 35 take part. The amendment would charge content providers €0.055 per gigabyte delivered to French subscribers.

  2. Government and finance committee oppose the text

    Statement

    Minister David Amiel says half the burden would land on smaller and French providers. Rapporteur Philippe Juvin warns of pass-through to advertisers.

  3. Socialist deputies file a per-gigabyte tax on data senders

    Legislation

    Laurent Lhardit files amendment I-1358 to the 2027 finance bill, with 68 signatures and four new articles for the tax code.

  4. VLC's non-profit puts its exposure at €1 million a year

    Reaction

    VideoLan says the amendment has no minimum threshold and no exemption for associations or free software, so its own traffic would be taxed.

Scenarios

1

Senate strips the gigabyte levy from the 2027 budget

Possible Resolves by End of 2026

Discussed by: French budget coverage, including Les Numériques and Clubic, which both stress the vote is one stage in a long process

The Senate, where the centre-right has a majority and the government's allies dominate the finance committee, rewrites or deletes Chapter XXI during first reading. The Assembly can revisit the text, but a deletion that survives the joint committee ends the levy for this budget cycle.

2

Levy becomes law and applies to traffic from 2027

Unlikely Resolves by Q2 2027

Discussed by: The amendment's authors, who project €10 billion a year, and Arcep's traffic estimate

The text survives both chambers, the Constitutional Council does not strike it down, and the government writes the decree that defines how access providers count and report volumes. Internet access providers then build metering systems and the tax administration issues its first notices.

3

Rewritten as a narrow levy on the largest platforms only

Possible Resolves by End of 2026

Discussed by: David Amiel's objection that half the burden falls on smaller and French providers

Lawmakers keep the volume principle but add a threshold, exempting organisations below a set French revenue or traffic level. That answers the VideoLan problem and the government's complaint about French mid-sized providers, while keeping Google, Meta, Amazon, Netflix and Akamai in scope.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

2019

France's digital services tax (2019)

France imposed a 3% tax on revenue that large technology companies earn from French users, arguing they booked profit in low-tax jurisdictions. The United States opened a trade investigation and threatened retaliatory tariffs on French goods, including wine and cheese.

Then

Washington suspended the tariffs while both sides negotiated at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Now

The French levy stayed in place and became a template: several countries adopted similar national digital taxes while global rules stalled.

Why this matters now

The per-gigabyte levy is the same playbook: a unilateral French charge on foreign platforms, with the same questions about retaliation and who ultimately pays.

2023

European Union 'fair share' consultation (2023)

The European Commission asked whether large traffic generators such as streaming services and cloud providers should contribute to the cost of telecom networks. Network operators argued that a handful of companies account for most traffic.

Then

The consultation drew heavy lobbying from both telecom operators and technology companies.

Now

The Commission did not put forward legislation, leaving the idea to national governments.

Why this matters now

Amendment I-1358 is a national version of the stalled Brussels proposal, applied through the tax code rather than telecom rules.

2020-2023

South Korea's Netflix network-fee dispute (2020–2023)

SK Broadband sued Netflix over the cost of carrying its traffic, and a Korean court found the streaming company should pay for network usage.

Then

An appellate court upheld the ruling in 2023.

Now

The dispute ended in a commercial partnership rather than a statutory levy, with the two companies agreeing to collaborate on network costs.

Why this matters now

It shows a traffic-based obligation can survive court review, and that the usual destination is a negotiated payment rather than a tax.

Sources

(7)