Pull to refresh
Logo
Fired WOOD-TV news directors win privacy lawsuit against Nexstar

Fired WOOD-TV news directors win privacy lawsuit against Nexstar

Rule Changes Grand Rapids, MI local

Jury awards Amy Fox $2.39 million and Stanton Tang $1.68 million after finding the broadcaster violated state privacy law when confirming the firings to journalists

October 2026: Jury awards $4 million total to fired executives

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

Two fired WOOD-TV news executives won a combined $4 million from Nexstar after a jury found the broadcaster invaded their privacy by discussing their terminations with journalists. The same jury rejected the executives' defamation claims.

The case grew from a June 2023 Pride Month coverage memo that sparked a newsroom revolt and led to four firings. Nexstar said it is considering an appeal.

Why it matters

A jury put a price on what an employer told other outlets' reporters about two firings - $4.08 million - though Nexstar says it is considering an appeal.

Monday: what changed in Grand Rapids, MI

One short email a week with the openings, closings, permits and council votes we covered. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

$2.39M
Fox's jury award
Larger of the two awards, for assistant news director Amy Fox.
$1.68M
Tang's jury award
Award to former news director Stanton Tang.
$4.08M
Combined verdict
Total damages awarded against Nexstar.
4
Employees fired
Tang, Fox, and two others terminated after the memo leak.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

June 2023 October 2026

5 events Latest: October 2026
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Jury awards $4 million total to fired executives

    Latest Verdict

    A jury finds Nexstar violated state privacy laws, awarding Fox $2.393 million and Tang $1.683 million; it rejects the defamation claims.

  2. Nexstar fires Tang, Fox, and two others

    Termination

    After an internal investigation, Nexstar terminates the news director, assistant news director, and two other employees.

  3. Pride Month coverage memo written

    Document

    Assistant news director Amy Fox writes internal memo urging scrutiny of Pride Month coverage at news director Stanton Tang's direction.

  4. Pride Month memo leaks to press

    Leak

    The memo is obtained by the website FTV Live; The Desk subsequently publishes the full document, bringing wider attention to the controversy.

Scenarios

1

Appeals court upholds $4M verdict against Nexstar

Likely Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Legal observers who note appellate courts typically defer to jury verdicts

Nexstar has said it will consider an appeal. Appellate courts generally defer to jury verdicts unless the trial judge committed a clear legal error. The key question is whether Nexstar's statements to journalists about the firings constituted publication of private facts under Michigan law. The jury heard evidence that Nexstar executives confirmed details of firings to reporters at CNN and other outlets.

2

Appeals court reverses WOOD-TV privacy verdict

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Nexstar, which says the verdict is inconsistent with governing law

Nexstar's likely arguments: confirming an employee's firing to journalists is not public disclosure of private facts, and the information was newsworthy given the public controversy. The jury's split verdict, finding no defamation but invasion of privacy, gives Nexstar a basis to argue the panel was confused.

3

Nexstar settles to end privacy litigation

Possible Resolves by Q2 2027

Discussed by: Court watchers noting the case nearly settled before trial

Settlement could come during the appeal. Nexstar faces interest accruing on the judgment and years of litigation distraction. Fox and Tang would get certainty and avoid the risk of reversal. Earlier settlement talks ended without a deal before trial.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

August 2017

James Damore's Google firing (2017)

Google engineer James Damore circulated an internal memo arguing that biological differences help explain gender gaps in the technology industry. The memo leaked to the press, went viral, and Google fired Damore days later, saying the memo promoted harmful gender stereotypes.

Then

Damore filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board, then attempted class-action arbitration against Google. He dropped both efforts in 2021.

Now

The firing became a defining moment in workplace culture wars, with critics on the right citing it as evidence that tech companies punish dissenting viewpoints.

Why this matters now

Like the WOOD-TV Pride Month memo, an internal document about a culturally sensitive topic leaked and led to termination. The WOOD-TV case produced a legal consequence — a jury verdict for the employees — that Damore's case did not.

March-April 2023

Dominion Voting Systems v. Fox News (2023)

Dominion Voting Systems sued Fox News for defamation over the network's coverage of baseless claims that Dominion's machines flipped the 2020 election. The case went to trial in April 2023 and settled for $787.5 million just before closing arguments.

Then

Fox paid Dominion $787.5 million, the largest publicly known defamation settlement involving a US media company.

Now

The case established that media companies face enormous financial exposure for what they report and say publicly.

Why this matters now

Both cases show media corporations incurring major financial liability for their public communications. The WOOD-TV verdict extends the pattern to privacy claims against an employer, not just defamation of an outside company.

Sources

(1)