Pull to refresh
Logo
J&J's experimental prostate cancer drug shrinks tumors in most patients

J&J's experimental prostate cancer drug shrinks tumors in most patients

New Capabilities

Phase 1 data shows a 75% response rate with JNJ-6143, a first-in-class dual-protein lock molecule in heavily pretreated disease

Today: Phase 1 results presented at ESMO 2026

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

Johnson & Johnson's experimental prostate cancer drug shrank tumors in 75 percent of patients with measurable disease in a Phase 1 trial. The results, presented at ESMO on October 25, are the first clinical data for JNJ-6143 — a molecule J&J acquired with its December 2025 purchase of Halda Therapeutics.

The trial enrolled patients who had already run through a median of four treatments, including chemotherapy and PSMA-targeted radiation therapy. For them, median survival is about two to three years. JNJ-6143 works through an approach no approved drug uses: it locks two proteins together inside the cancer cell, trapping one the cell needs to survive.

Why it matters

If the drug holds up in Phase 2, it could give late-stage prostate cancer patients a daily oral option after standard therapies stop working.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

75%
Confirmed tumor response rate
12 of 16 patients with measurable disease had complete or partial responses per RECIST criteria.
77%
Confirmed PSA50 rate at 50 mg dose
Patients whose prostate-specific antigen fell by at least half, among 38 receiving the 50 mg dose.
48%
Confirmed PSA90 rate at 50 mg dose
Nearly half of patients saw PSA levels drop by at least 90 percent.
50 mg
Recommended Phase 2 dose
Once-daily oral dosing selected for further development based on activity, safety and pharmacokinetics.
4
Median prior therapies
Patients had received a median of four prior treatments, including chemotherapy and PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Organizations Involved

Timeline

December 2025 October 2026

2 events Latest: Today
  1. Phase 1 results presented at ESMO 2026

    Today Clinical data

    75% confirmed response rate, 77% PSA50; 50 mg daily selected as Phase 2 dose.

  2. J&J completes Halda acquisition

    Acquisition

    Johnson & Johnson completes purchase of Halda Therapeutics, adding the RIPTAC platform and JNJ-6143.

Scenarios

1

JNJ-6143 confirms signal, enters Phase 3 registration trial

Likely Resolves by End of 2028

Discussed by: J&J has already initiated Phase 2 (NCT07832292), indicating internal confidence in the 50 mg dose

J&J moves JNJ-6143 into a registrational Phase 3 study after Phase 2 replicates the Phase 1 response rates. A fast-track or breakthrough designation from the FDA would shorten the path to approval, given the unmet need in patients who have exhausted AR-targeted therapy, chemotherapy and radioligand therapy.

2

Safety signal stalls JNJ-6143 development

Unlikely Resolves by Q2 2028

Discussed by: J&J's own data — 11% of patients at 50 mg interrupted dosing, 3% discontinued due to adverse events

The most common side effects — elevated cholesterol (18%), nausea (16%) and high triglycerides (16%) — were manageable in early follow-up. If longer exposure produces liver toxicity or cardiovascular issues, regulators could place the trial on hold or J&J could halt the program.

3

Response rates moderate as the cohort grows

Possible Resolves by End of 2028

Discussed by: Historical pattern across oncology Phase 1 programs; the early signal comes from a small cohort of 16 patients

The 75% response rate reflects just 16 patients with measurable disease, and the company's own slide deck reports 69% (11/16) at a different cutoff. As Phase 2 enrolls more patients with longer follow-up, response rates typically drift toward a truer, often lower, estimate. The drug would still be valuable if PSA responses hold, but regulators may require more evidence.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

March 2022

Pluvicto approval for mCRPC (2022)

The FDA approved Novartis's Pluvicto (177Lu-PSMA-617), a radioactive molecule that delivers radiation to prostate cancer cells expressing the PSMA protein. It was the first radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, aimed at patients who had progressed on both androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane chemotherapy.

Then

Pluvicto became a standard option in late-stage prostate cancer, with uptake limited by manufacturing capacity and isotope supply.

Now

It proved that a fundamentally new modality could help patients who had exhausted existing drug classes, reshaping how late-stage prostate cancer is sequenced.

Why this matters now

JNJ-6143 is attempting the same feat with an oral small molecule instead of a radioactive isotope — a new mechanism for patients who have already run through AR-targeted therapy, chemotherapy and PSMA-targeted radiation.

August 2012

Enzalutamide approval (2012)

The FDA approved enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after chemotherapy. The drug blocks the androgen receptor from being activated by testosterone and other androgens.

Then

Enzalutamide extended survival and became a standard of care in mCRPC.

Now

It validated the androgen receptor as a durable target across the disease course, even where earlier anti-androgens had failed.

Why this matters now

JNJ-6143 also targets the androgen receptor, but through proximity-based sequestration rather than blockade. Its early results test whether the same axis can be attacked a different way in patients resistant to AR pathway drugs.

2019

PROTACs reach the clinic (2019)

Arvinas became the first company to bring a PROTAC — a molecule that hijacks the cell's degradation machinery to destroy a target protein — into clinical trials, with ARV-110 for prostate cancer and ARV-471 for breast cancer.

Then

PROTACs generated intense industry interest in 'protein degrader' pharmacology, but early prostate cancer data showed modest activity.

Now

The mixed results tempered expectations that proximity-based drugs would automatically outperform conventional inhibitors, even with a clever mechanism.

Why this matters now

RIPTACs and PROTACs both rely on induced proximity, but RIPTACs sequester a protein instead of marking it for destruction. JNJ-6143 is the first test of that variation, and the PROTAC precedent argues for caution before treating a Phase 1 signal as a cure.

Sources

(5)