Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
New heart preservation methods expand who can donate and how far organs can travel

New heart preservation methods expand who can donate and how far organs can travel

New Capabilities

Vanderbilt's REUP technique triples preservation time at a fraction of current costs, potentially transforming heart transplantation

February 13th, 2026: Aaron Williams named to TIME100 Health list

Overview

For decades, a donated heart had to reach its recipient within four hours, and only hearts from brain-dead donors qualified. Both constraints are now falling. A Vanderbilt University team has published results in the Journal of the American Medical Association showing that their REUP technique—a flush of oxygenated blood, del Nido cardioplegia solution, and cardioprotective additives—can preserve a heart from a donor whose heart has stopped beating for up to eight hours, with outcomes matching or exceeding existing methods at roughly $2,000 per transplant instead of $65,000.

About 3,800 Americans currently wait for a donor heart, and 13 people die each day waiting for an organ of any kind. The new technique works on hearts from donation after circulatory death donors—people who die when their heart stops rather than from brain death—a pool that existing methods have only recently begun to tap. By eliminating the need for expensive perfusion machines and sidestepping the ethical controversies surrounding techniques that restart circulation in a deceased donor's body, REUP could make heart transplantation accessible to more patients and more hospitals.

Why it matters

Every hour added to heart preservation time means thousands more potential donors and recipients can be matched across greater distances.

Play on this story Voices Debate Predict

Key Indicators

~$2,000
REUP cost per transplant
Compared to roughly $65,000 for TransMedics Organ Care System perfusion devices
8 hours
Maximum preservation time demonstrated
Traditional cold storage limits hearts to about four hours outside the body
95.8%
30-day recipient survival
Among 24 patients who received REUP-preserved hearts between November 2024 and July 2025
3,800
Americans on the heart transplant waiting list
Demand for donor hearts consistently exceeds supply
0
Hearts discarded
None of the 24 hearts recovered using REUP were discarded before transplant

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

December 1967 February 2026

10 events Latest: February 13th, 2026 · 4 months ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Aaron Williams named to TIME100 Health list

    Latest Recognition

    TIME recognized Williams as a "pioneer" on its 2026 list of the 100 most influential people in health for his work developing the REUP technique.

  2. REUP results published in JAMA

    Research

    The Journal of the American Medical Association published Vanderbilt's study of 24 REUP heart transplants showing 95.8% 30-day survival, zero discarded hearts, and preservation times up to eight hours—all at roughly $2,000 per transplant.

  3. Related storage study shows reduced graft dysfunction

    Research

    Vanderbilt published findings on a new donor organ storage method that reduces rates of severe primary graft dysfunction, complementing the REUP work.

  4. Preliminary REUP results announced

    Research

    Vanderbilt announced early results from the REUP technique showing hearts preserved for up to eight hours with outcomes comparable to existing methods.

  5. Vanderbilt performs first REUP heart transplant

    Milestone

    Vanderbilt's cardiac surgery team performed the first transplant using their REUP flush technique, avoiding both machine perfusion and normothermic regional perfusion.

  6. Federal scrutiny of normothermic regional perfusion intensifies

    Policy

    The Health Resources and Services Administration received a letter raising patient safety and ethical concerns about normothermic regional perfusion, prompting the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network to develop new guidelines.

  7. DCD hearts reach 11% of U.S. heart transplants

    Data

    The share of heart transplants using donation after circulatory death donors grew from 2% in late 2019 to 11%, driven by the spread of perfusion technology.

  8. First modern DCD heart transplant in the United States

    Milestone

    Duke University surgeons performed the first donation after circulatory death heart transplant in the U.S., opening a new donor pool that had previously been off-limits for hearts.

  9. United Kingdom publishes first major DCD heart transplant results

    Research

    Royal Papworth Hospital published results from 50 patients receiving hearts from circulatory death donors, showing 100% 30-day survival matching traditional brain-death donations.

  10. First human heart transplant performed

    Milestone

    Christiaan Barnard performed the first human heart transplant in Cape Town, South Africa, using a heart from a circulatory death donor—the original form of heart donation before brain death criteria became standard.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

December 1967 - 1968

First human heart transplant and the shift to brain death donors (1967-1968)

Christiaan Barnard transplanted the first human heart in Cape Town using a heart from a donor whose heart had stopped—a circulatory death donor, in modern terminology. But the patient, Louis Washkansky, died 18 days later. As brain death criteria were formalized in 1968 by a Harvard committee, the field shifted almost entirely to brain-dead donors, whose hearts could be kept beating on ventilators until recovery.

Then

Brain-dead donors became the standard, offering hearts that never stopped beating and could be preserved on ice for about four hours.

Now

For over 50 years, only brain-dead donors were considered for heart donation, excluding a large pool of potential donors who died by cardiac arrest.

Why this matters now

The REUP technique returns to the original concept—recovering hearts that have stopped beating—but with modern preservation science that Barnard lacked, potentially reopening a donor category that was abandoned for half a century.

2011 - 2021

Organ Care System and the machine perfusion revolution (2011-2021)

TransMedics developed the Organ Care System, a portable device that keeps a donor heart warm and beating during transport. After years of clinical trials, it received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2021. The technology enabled the modern resurgence of DCD heart transplantation in the United States by allowing surgeons to assess whether a stopped heart was viable before committing to transplant.

Then

DCD heart transplants became possible in the U.S., growing from zero to 11% of all heart transplants by 2023.

Now

The $65,000-per-use cost and operational complexity limited adoption to large, well-funded transplant centers, creating a two-tier system.

Why this matters now

REUP achieves a similar outcome—viable DCD heart transplants—without the machine, at roughly 3% of the cost. If validated, it could democratize what the Organ Care System made possible only for elite centers.

1987 - 2000s

Laparoscopic surgery displaces open surgery (1987-2000s)

When Philippe Mouret performed the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1987, skeptics questioned whether minimally invasive surgery could match open techniques. Within a decade, laparoscopic gallbladder removal became the default. The pattern—a simpler, cheaper technique initially dismissed by advocates of expensive, complex alternatives—repeated across surgical specialties.

Then

Early adopters faced skepticism and calls for larger trials before widespread adoption.

Now

The simpler technique won because it reduced costs, recovery times, and barriers to entry for smaller hospitals.

Why this matters now

REUP faces the same dynamic: a simpler approach challenging an established, expensive technology. History suggests that if outcomes hold up in larger studies, cost and simplicity advantages tend to drive adoption even against institutional inertia.

Sources

(10)