Pull to refresh
Logo
Australian regulator rejects Transgrid bid to pass cost blowout to consumers

Australian regulator rejects Transgrid bid to pass cost blowout to consumers

Rule Changes

Preliminary ruling finds the A$1.2 billion Project Energy Connect overrun was foreseeable and the grid will not fail without it

Yesterday: AER rejects Transgrid's recovery bid

Overview

Updated 41 minutes ago

Transgrid's plan would have added about A$18 to the average household power bill in 2027-28 to cover overruns on Project Energy Connect. Australia's energy regulator said no on September 1, provisionally rejecting the A$1.2 billion recovery bid.

The preliminary ruling says the blowout was foreseeable and the grid will not fail without the project. At stake is who pays when nation-critical energy infrastructure costs spiral. The rejection pushes the cost onto Transgrid's owners, for now.

The Australian Energy Regulator's position is not final. Transgrid can still seek to recover the overspend in the 2028-33 revenue review, where spending judged 'prudent and efficient' can enter its asset base. Memery, a consumer advocate, said approval would have opened the door to shifting project risk from businesses onto households.

Why it matters

The ruling decides whether households or shareholders pay for cost blowouts on the transmission lines Australia's renewable transition depends on.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

A$1.2B
Amount Transgrid sought to recover
Claimed from consumers through its 2023-28 revenue determination.
A$3.6B
New estimated project cost
Up from about A$2.3 billion when the spending plan was approved.
A$1.5B
Total cost overrun on Transgrid's section
Shareholders face about A$130 million in losses even if relief had been approved.
2 of 7
Reopen criteria Transgrid failed
The AER was not satisfied on unforeseeability or grid-security grounds.
A$18
Bill impact if the bid had been approved
Estimated average residential power bill increase in 2027-28.
900 km
Length of Project Energy Connect
The interconnector is meant to unlock 3.5 GW of renewable capacity.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Most of these play right now — no account needed. Sign up to save scores, keep a streak, and unlock Debate and Predict. Log in Sign Up
Predict 3 ways this could play out. Back the one you believe — contrarian picks score more when a scenario has a resolution date. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

December 2022 September 2026

6 events Latest: Yesterday
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. AER rejects Transgrid's recovery bid

    Latest Regulatory decision

    Preliminary position says the blowout was foreseeable and the grid will not fail without it.

  2. Blowout details made public

    Revelation

    The AER publishes Transgrid's 38-page application, exposing the contractor failure and A$130 million shareholder losses.

  3. AER opens consultation

    Regulatory

    The regulator seeks submissions on whether the blowout meets the reopen criteria in the National Electricity Rules.

  4. Transgrid applies for recovery

    Filing

    Transgrid asks the AER to reopen its 2023-28 revenue deal and recover A$1.2 billion from consumers.

  5. ElectraNet finishes SA leg

    Milestone

    ElectraNet completes the 206 km South Australian section on time and on budget.

  6. Clough enters insolvency

    Contract

    Australian contractor Clough collapses, disrupting the Secure Energy Joint Venture building Transgrid's line.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

July 2017

V.C. Summer nuclear cancellation (2017)

South Carolina utilities abandoned a two-reactor nuclear expansion at the V.C. Summer plant after costs ballooned and contractor Westinghouse filed for bankruptcy. About US$9 billion had been spent on a project that never produced power.

Then

Customers who funded construction through monthly surcharges were left paying for a cancelled plant, and the utilities' owners took large write-downs.

Now

The failure became a national lesson on construction risk in regulated energy infrastructure and the limits of cost recovery.

Why this matters now

Like Project Energy Connect, it combined a contractor collapse, spiraling costs, and a fight over whether customers or owners absorb the loss.

January 2018

Carillion collapse (2018)

UK construction giant Carillion collapsed into liquidation in January 2018, leaving dozens of public projects unfinished. Taxpayers absorbed the cost of completing hospitals, roads and schools.

Then

The government stepped in to finish critical projects and tightened rules on outsourcing and risk transfer.

Now

Carillion became the reference point for contractor insolvency and the question of who holds project risk.

Why this matters now

Clough's insolvency is the same pattern. Transgrid called it unforeseeable; the AER was not persuaded.

2019–2025

Snowy 2.0 cost blowout (2019– )

Australia's Snowy 2.0 pumped-hydro project was approved at A$4.1 billion in 2019. Estimates have since climbed above A$12 billion, with completion pushed back to 2028-29.

Then

The federal government, which owns Snowy Hydro, has absorbed the increases through repeated capital top-ups, shielding consumers so far.

Now

The project shows how Australia's energy transition infrastructure has routinely blown its budgets.

Why this matters now

Project Energy Connect is the transmission-side version of the same pattern. The AER decision tests whether the cost lands on consumer bills.

Sources

(10)