Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
Countries establish Special Tribunal for crime of aggression against Ukraine

Countries establish Special Tribunal for crime of aggression against Ukraine

Rule Changes

Treaty-based court will target Russia's senior leadership from a base in The Hague

May 16th, 2026: Ukraine FM names defendants, calls for global expansion

Overview

For the first time since Nuremberg, a tribunal exists to prosecute heads of state for the crime of aggression. Thirty-six countries and the European Union signed the founding agreement on May 15 in Chisinau, Moldova.

The court targets Russia's senior leadership and Belarusian President Lukashenko. On May 16, Ukraine's foreign minister listed the names: Putin, Shoigu, Gerasimov, Bortnikov, Medvedev, and Lukashenko, calling them all recipients of 'their ticket to The Hague.' Four EU members, including Hungary, did not sign.

Why it matters

If the tribunal indicts Putin, any of the 36 signatory countries would be legally bound to arrest him on entry.

Questions about this story

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

36
Signatory states
Plus the European Union. Hungary, Slovakia, Bulgaria, and Malta are the EU members that did not sign.
80 years
Since the last aggression tribunal
Nuremberg in 1945–46 was the only previous international court to prosecute the leadership crime of waging aggressive war.
4 years
Since the invasion began
Russia launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022.
1
Existing ICC warrant for Putin
Issued March 17, 2023, for unlawful deportation of Ukrainian children. The new tribunal addresses a separate charge.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 5 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Higher or Lower Two numbers from this story. Guess which is bigger. 5 rounds to set a streak. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

February 2022 May 2026

8 events Latest: May 16th, 2026 · 1 month ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Ukraine FM names defendants, calls for global expansion

    Latest Diplomatic

    Foreign Minister Sybiha named the primary targets — Putin, Shoigu, Gerasimov, Bortnikov, Medvedev, Patrushev, and Belarusian President Lukashenko — saying they had all received 'their ticket to The Hague.' Ukraine called on non-European states to join the coalition.

  2. 36 countries and EU sign tribunal agreement

    Treaty

    Foreign ministers gather in Chisinau and sign the agreement formally establishing the Special Tribunal in The Hague.

  3. Core Group of states begins formal work

    Diplomatic

    A group including Ukraine, EU, UK, and other allies begins meeting to design the tribunal's jurisdiction and structure.

  4. Council of Europe expels Russia

    Diplomatic

    Russia becomes the first country ever expelled from the Council of Europe over the invasion.

  5. First proposals for a special aggression tribunal

    Proposal

    Ukrainian officials and a group of international legal scholars publish detailed proposals for an ad hoc tribunal to try Russian leaders.

  6. Russia launches full-scale invasion of Ukraine

    Inciting event

    Russian forces cross into Ukraine from the north, east, and south. Putin announces the invasion in a pre-dawn televised address.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

November 1945 - October 1946

Nuremberg Tribunal (1945-1946)

After Nazi Germany's defeat, the Allied powers established a tribunal in Nuremberg to try senior Nazi leaders. Twenty-four defendants faced charges including crimes against peace, the legal precursor to the modern crime of aggression.

Then

Twelve defendants were sentenced to death; seven received prison terms; three were acquitted.

Now

Nuremberg established the principle that planning and waging aggressive war could be prosecuted as an international crime, even by heads of state.

Why this matters now

The Ukraine tribunal draws directly on Nuremberg's framework. It targets the same leadership-level crime that Nuremberg prosecuted for the first time.

May 1993 - December 2017

International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1993-2017)

The UN Security Council established an ad hoc tribunal in The Hague to prosecute serious crimes during the Balkan wars. It indicted 161 individuals, including sitting Serbian president Slobodan Milošević.

Then

Milošević was extradited in 2001 and died in his cell in 2006 before a verdict. The tribunal eventually convicted 90 individuals.

Now

ICTY proved a sitting head of state could be indicted by an international court. Its work fed directly into the International Criminal Court created in 2002.

Why this matters now

Like the Ukraine tribunal, ICTY was created to fill an accountability gap. It sat in The Hague and tried leaders whose home country refused to cooperate.

January 2002 - December 2013

Special Court for Sierra Leone (2002-2013)

A hybrid court created by treaty between the UN and Sierra Leone tried those most responsible for atrocities in the civil war. It indicted Liberian president Charles Taylor while he was still in office.

Then

Taylor was convicted in 2012 of aiding rebels who committed atrocities. He received a 50-year sentence.

Now

The court showed a sitting head of state could be removed from office and tried by an international body. Taylor was the first head of state convicted by an international court since Nuremberg.

Why this matters now

Sierra Leone shows the model the Ukraine tribunal hopes to follow: a treaty-based court with international backing, willing to indict sitting leaders.

Sources

(7)