Pull to refresh
Logo
Immigration judge rules Wisconsin mosque leader can be deported on foreign policy grounds

Immigration judge rules Wisconsin mosque leader can be deported on foreign policy grounds

Rule Changes

Salah Sarsour, president of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee, faces removal after three decades as a US resident.

Yesterday: Ruling announced; Sarsour's team says it will appeal

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

An immigration judge ruled Salah Sarsour, president of Wisconsin's largest mosque, can be deported on foreign policy grounds. The government argued his decades-old convictions in Israel make him a national security threat.

Sarsour, a lawful permanent resident for more than 30 years, called the ruling deeply disappointing and plans to appeal. The judge rejected the government's claim that Sarsour lied on his green card application.

Why it matters

A rarely used law now lets the US deport a permanent resident over foreign policy views, a precedent for targeting Palestinian rights advocates.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

80+
days Sarsour held in ICE custody
Detained from March 30 until a federal judge ordered his release in June.
30+
years Sarsour has lived in the US
Lawful permanent resident since 1993 with no US criminal record.
2
convictions in Israel cited by the government
1988 and 1995 convictions Sarsour denies, saying he was tortured into confessing.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

June 2025 September 2026

6 events Latest: Yesterday
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Ruling announced; Sarsour's team says it will appeal

    Latest Statement

    Sarsour's legal team confirms the decision publicly. Salinardi announces retirement; Judge Craig Defoe will oversee the case going forward.

Scenarios

1

Appeals court overturns deportation ruling

Possible Resolves by Q2 2027

Discussed by: Sarsour's legal team, led by Patrick Taurel

Sarsour's attorneys argue the case is retaliation for protected speech and that the government knew about his Israeli convictions for decades. The Board of Immigration Appeals or a federal court could reverse the ruling if they find the foreign policy designation was a pretext for silencing his pro-Palestinian advocacy.

2

Deportation order upheld, Sarsour faces removal

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: US Department of Homeland Security

If the appeal fails, the removal order stands. Sarsour could be sent to Jordan, Israel, or the Palestinian territories. His attorneys warn Jordan has no obligation to accept him and that he would be handed over to Israel if sent there.

3

Case continues through prolonged appeals and relief proceedings

Likely Resolves by Q1 2028

Discussed by: Legal observers following the case

Sarsour can apply for protection from torture after the removal order, arguing he was tortured in Israeli custody before. That requires showing he would face torture if removed, a high bar. The Trump administration's appeal of Hanlon's release order also continues separately.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

March 2025

Mahmoud Khalil deportation case (2025)

Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian rights advocate, was detained by federal agents in New York under the same rarely used foreign policy provision invoked against Sarsour. Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed the designation memo used in both cases.

Then

Khalil's case drew national protests and litigation over the use of the foreign policy ground for deportation.

Now

The provision's revival under the Trump administration established a pattern of targeting Palestinian rights advocates for removal.

Why this matters now

The same legal authority Rubio invoked against Khalil was cited to deport Sarsour, showing coordinated use of the provision.

2025

Mohsen Mahdawi case (2025)

Mohsen Mahdawi, another Palestinian rights advocate, was also targeted for deportation under the same foreign policy provision. Court documents in Sarsour's case cite both Khalil and Mahdawi as parallels.

Then

Mahdawi's case, like Khalil's, became a flashpoint in debates over deportation and free speech.

Now

The cases together demonstrate the administration's broader strategy of using foreign policy designations against Palestinian activists.

Why this matters now

Sarsour's case follows the same legal template, suggesting the provision is being applied systematically rather than in isolation.

Sources

(7)