Pull to refresh
Logo
What Changed
Following Why Sign Up
DOE launches quantum computing competition aimed at fusion and battery materials

DOE launches quantum computing competition aimed at fusion and battery materials

New Capabilities

Milestone-based race offers up to $215 million for fault-tolerant systems with 100+ logical qubits by 2028

October 19th, 2026: Application deadline

Overview

Updated Oct 21

The Department of Energy's $215 million contest to build a quantum computer reliable enough for real science closed to applications on October 19. The agency has not said which companies it will fund.

DOE also published eight priority applications that define what counts as a scientifically useful machine, under four headings: chemistry, materials, subatomic physics and applied mathematics. Fusion reactor materials and battery chemistry carry the clearest energy payoff, but the department's advisory roadmap puts useful results in the 2030s.

Why it matters

Quantum simulation could compress years of battery and fusion materials testing into months, accelerating grid-scale storage and commercial fusion power.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

$215M
Total planned competition funding
Only $2.5 million is committed for fiscal 2026; outyears depend on congressional appropriations.
100
Minimum logical qubits for first-generation system
Base threshold for the $100M incentive pool; bonus tiers pay out at 150 and 200 logical qubits.
50%
Estimated odds of hitting the 2028 hardware milestone
Dario Gil's estimate at the September 17 announcement call; he put odds in the high 90s by 2030.
7
Grand scientific challenges in the SCAC roadmap
Fusion reactor materials and next-generation batteries and superconductors are two of the seven.
8
Priority applications set by DOE
Science targets DOE will use to judge whether a fault-tolerant machine is scientifically relevant.
3-10
Expected selections
DOE expects to select at least three and up to ten awardees from the applicant pool.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Log in Sign Up

People Involved

Darío Gil
Darío Gil
Under Secretary for Science at the U.S. Department of Energy
Publicly framed the competition as a decades-long effort with high near-term schedule risk

Organizations Involved

U.S. Department of Energy
U.S. Department of Energy
Federal agency
Applications closed October 19; awardees not yet announced

The federal agency funding the competition, which pays private companies for demonstrated quantum hardware milestones.
Office of Science Advisory Committee
Office of Science Advisory Committee
Federal advisory committee
Published the science roadmap alongside the competition announcement

DOE's advisory body, whose Quantum Subcommittee laid out seven grand scientific challenges the new machines are meant to tackle.
DOE National Laboratories
DOE National Laboratories
Federal research network
Overseeing the hardware validation testbed

The national labs receive a separate $45 million lab call to build testbeds that verify and validate competitors' quantum hardware.

Timeline

September 2026 October 2026

6 events Latest: October 19th, 2026 · 3 weeks ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date

  1. Application deadline

    Latest Deadline

    Final applications for the Quantum Genesis Q Competition are due.

  2. Questions deadline for applicants

    Deadline

    Applicants must submit questions about the competition by 5:00 p.m. ET.

  3. DOE names eight quantum priority applications

    Policy

    DOE releases Quantum Genesis Priority Applications covering chemistry, materials, subatomic physics and applied mathematics, to be used as benchmarks for scientifically relevant quantum computers.

  4. DOE holds applicant webinar

    Event

    DOE held a virtual informational webinar for potential Quantum Genesis Q Competition applicants at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

  5. DOE announces Quantum Genesis Q Competition

    Policy

    DOE opens a $215 million milestone competition for private firms to build fault-tolerant quantum computers with at least 100 logical qubits by 2028.

  6. Science advisory panel publishes seven-grand-challenge roadmap

    Report

    The Office of Science Advisory Committee releases a quantum roadmap, naming fusion materials and next-generation batteries and superconductors as headline scientific targets.

Scenarios

1

First 100-logical-qubit quantum system demonstrated by 2028

Possible Resolves by End of 2028

Discussed by: Dario Gil's probability estimates at the announcement; DOE officials on the press call

A private team claims the $100 million general pool by demonstrating a system with at least 100 logical qubits capable of hundreds of millions of fault-tolerant operations. Gil put the odds at roughly 50% in 2028, rising to the high 90s by 2030. The competition's Phase II structure is built around this moment: the incentive pool only pays out on demonstrated hardware.

2

Congressional appropriations fall short and the competition stalls

Uncertain Resolves by End of 2026

Discussed by: DOE's own funding disclosure; the Superconducting Super Collider's cancellation history

Only $2.5 million of the $215 million is committed. The remaining outyear funding is contingent on congressional appropriations. If lawmakers fund the program below requested levels or zero it out, the incentive pools shrink or the timeline stretches. Federal big-science projects have a documented record of this failure mode.

3

Quantum materials prediction validated for batteries by 2028

Unlikely Resolves by End of 2028

Discussed by: SCAC roadmap milestone schedule

The SCAC's roadmap sets a 2028 milestone for a validated quantum prediction of a correlated material's properties matching experiment. If it happens, it signals quantum can meaningfully shortcut materials discovery. The roadmap itself flags this as validated science, not just hardware scale — a higher bar than the 100-qubit demonstration, and one that depends on both hardware and algorithm maturity.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

2016-2023

Exascale Computing Project (2016-2023)

The DOE used milestone-based funding across national labs and vendors to build the first exascale supercomputers. Frontier came online in 2022 and claimed the top spot on the TOP500 list.

Then

Frontier, Aurora, and El Capitan delivered the promised scale, proving the milestone model can work for hardware the field is ready to build.

Now

Established DOE's competitive procurement pattern that vendors race to win — the model the quantum competition copies.

Why this matters now

Same agency, same incentive structure, but exascale built on decades of mature semiconductor manufacturing. Quantum computing has no equivalent industrial base yet, which is the core risk.

October 1987-October 1993

Superconducting Super Collider (1987-1993)

Congress approved a 54-mile particle collider in Texas at an estimated $4.4 billion. Cost estimates ballooned past $12 billion, and lawmakers killed the project in 1993.

Then

Thousands of jobs lost in Ellis County, Texas; about $2 billion spent with little to show.

Now

Became the standard cautionary tale for big-science projects dependent on multi-year federal funding.

Why this matters now

The quantum competition has only $2.5 million committed. The remaining $212.5 million depends on Congress approving outyear appropriations, the same vulnerability that sank the SSC.

December 2022

National Ignition Facility achieves fusion ignition (2022)

After decades of missed predictions and schedule slips, the DOE's laser facility achieved a fusion reaction that produced more energy than it consumed.

Then

Hailed as a scientific milestone; practical fusion power remained far off.

Now

Reinforced that fusion-related milestones on government roadmaps tend to arrive late, not early.

Why this matters now

The SCAC roadmap itself puts quantum-enabled fusion materials on a 2030-plus horizon, echoing fusion's history of deferred promises.

Sources

(18)
+12
POWER Magazine U.S. Department of Energy CRBC News Grants.gov The Register Newswise FedScoop TechAU The Quantum Insider QuantumIntel Fermilab DOE Office of Science BW&CO Quantum Brief eWeek U.S. Department of Energy Nextgov/FCW U.S. Department of Energy