Overview
On December 20, 2025, Blue Origin flew New Shepard NS-37—and a line quietly snapped. Michaela “Michi” Benthaus became the first wheelchair user to cross the Kármán line, float free in microgravity, and come home safely.
The stakes aren’t just symbolic. If commercial spaceflight can be made routine for bodies space programs historically excluded, it forces a redesign of training, vehicles, and safety assumptions—and it challenges the industry’s weakest claim: that “opening space” means more than opening a checkout page.
Key Indicators
People Involved
Organizations Involved
Blue Origin is betting that reusable rockets plus repeatable operations can turn spaceflight from rarity into product.
ESA is turning disability inclusion into a formal human-spaceflight readiness pathway.
The FAA decides when “commercial spaceflight” is allowed to behave like an industry instead of an experiment.
AstroAccess treats disability not as a constraint, but as a design input.
Wings for Life funds spinal cord injury research, linking high-profile moments to hard science.
Timeline
-
NS-37 flies: first wheelchair user above the Kármán line
MilestoneBenthaus and five others fly a brief suborbital mission; Blue Origin spotlights built-in accessibility.
-
NS-37 attempt scrubs after pre-flight checks flag an issue
OperationsBlue Origin stands down and pushes launch to the next available window.
-
Blue Origin announces NS-37 crew featuring Michi Benthaus
AnnouncementThe company frames the flight as an accessibility milestone: first wheelchair user to space.
-
ESA briefs Fly! feasibility success; disability inclusion moves toward “Mission Ready”
ResearchESA says it’s technically feasible to fly an astronaut with a physical disability on ISS missions.
-
Crewed New Shepard flights resume after the grounding
MilestoneBlue Origin flies NS-25, re-opening the tourism business after regulatory-driven fixes.
-
New Shepard returns to flight (uncrewed), proving fixes in the air
Return-to-FlightBlue Origin launches its first mission since the 2022 failure, restarting operational momentum.
-
FAA closes NS-23 investigation, mandates corrective actions
RegulatoryThe FAA cites engine nozzle failure and requires 21 fixes plus licensing steps before return.
-
New Shepard fails; capsule abort works; program grounded
SafetyAn uncrewed mission suffers an engine nozzle failure; the capsule escapes and lands safely.
-
AstroAccess takes disability research into microgravity
ResearchA disabled ambassador crew flies parabolic arcs to test accessibility concepts for future spacecraft.
-
New Shepard’s first crewed flight launches the modern Blue Origin era
MilestoneBlue Origin flies NS-16 with Jeff Bezos aboard, making space tourism a repeatable product story.
Scenarios
Blue Origin Makes Accessibility a Normal Sales Feature, Not a One-Off
Discussed by: Blue Origin statements; AP reporting; Space.com coverage of NS-37
The “first” becomes a pattern: Blue Origin turns NS-37 into a repeatable playbook—customer screening, transfer protocols, recovery procedures, and ground infrastructure—then markets it as proof of maturity as it ramps flight rate in 2026. The trigger is simple: more customers with disabilities fly without bespoke, mission-by-mission improvisation. The result is a quiet standard shift where accessibility is treated like seat count or window size: part of the product.
Space Agencies Borrow Commercial Proof—and Disability Inclusion Jumps to Orbital Missions
Discussed by: ESA Fly! program communications; broader industry analysis comparing suborbital vs orbital pathways
Commercial flights de-risk the cultural debate while agencies handle the technical depth. ESA’s Fly! work advances from feasibility into “Mission Ready,” and commercial operators become testbeds for training and human-factors data. The trigger is a concrete ESA mission assignment pathway for an astronaut with a disability, plus industry-wide adoption of universal design requirements in crew vehicles and ground ops. The result: disability inclusion stops being “inspirational” and becomes contractual and procedural.
A Mishap or Backlash Freezes the Narrative—and Inclusion Becomes a Footnote Again
Discussed by: Regulatory history around NS-23; recurring public criticism of space tourism’s value and impact
The risk isn’t the accessibility concept—it’s the platform. A serious anomaly, or a sustained political/media backlash over safety, emissions, or perceived billionaire leisure, could slow flight rates and cut the number of opportunities to iterate on inclusive design. The trigger would be a major incident that forces a long pause, tightening insurance and licensing expectations. The result: fewer flights, fewer “nontraditional” seats, and a return to symbolic gestures over operational change.
Historical Context
NASA Astronaut Class of 1978 (“Thirty-Five New Guys”)
1978-01-01 to 1983-06-18What Happened
NASA selected a class that, for the first time, included women and greater demographic diversity, then turned those selections into flight assignments. The shift wasn’t just social; it forced changes in training culture, mission roles, and what “astronaut” meant.
Outcome
Short term: Sally Ride flew in 1983, proving the pipeline could reach orbit.
Long term: Diversity became institutionalized—slowly, imperfectly, but structurally.
Why It's Relevant
NS-37 is a commercial echo of the same pattern: identity milestone, then system redesign.
Inspiration4 and the First Spaceflyer with a Prosthesis
2021-09-15 to 2021-09-18What Happened
SpaceX flew an all-civilian orbital mission. Hayley Arceneaux, a cancer survivor with a prosthesis, became a visible proof point that ‘civilian’ could also mean ‘nontraditional body.’
Outcome
Short term: Commercial orbital flight gained legitimacy beyond billionaire joyrides.
Long term: Private missions expanded the definition of astronaut faster than governments did.
Why It's Relevant
NS-37 extends the inclusivity arc from prosthesis to wheelchair use—and from orbit back to scalable cadence.
John Glenn’s Return to Space (STS-95) and the “Who Is Space For?” Question
1998-10-29 to 1998-11-07What Happened
NASA flew 77-year-old John Glenn to study aging and spaceflight similarities, challenging assumptions about who could safely fly. It tied a demographic ‘first’ to a scientific justification.
Outcome
Short term: Glenn became the oldest person to go to space at the time, expanding perceived eligibility.
Long term: Demographic milestones became a tool for reframing mission value beyond exploration alone.
Why It's Relevant
Benthaus’s flight similarly forces the value question: inclusion as mission rationale, not marketing.