Pull to refresh
Logo
Study traces Devil's Arrows stones to Brimham Rocks, 11 miles away

Study traces Devil's Arrows stones to Brimham Rocks, 11 miles away

New Capabilities

Non-destructive mineral fingerprinting resolves a centuries-old mystery about Britain's tallest stone row

Today: Study traces Devil's Arrows stones to Brimham Rocks

Overview

Updated 1 hour ago

Britain's tallest surviving stone row, the Devil's Arrows near Boroughbridge, has guarded its secret for 4,000 years: where did the three pillars come from? New research answers it. Builders hauled each 25-tonne stone 18 kilometers from Brimham Rocks, bypassing nearer sources.

Researchers at Curtin University and the University of York used adhesive tape to lift microscopic zircon and apatite grains from the stones without damage. Isotopic fingerprinting matched them to Brimham Rocks, ruling out glacial movement. The deliberate choice of a distant, rugged source suggests the landscape carried cultural or spiritual meaning for Neolithic builders.

Why it matters

A damage-free tape-lift technique can now trace standing stones to their sources, opening a new window into how prehistoric builders moved and raised megaliths.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

25 tonnes
Weight per stone
Each of the three surviving Devil's Arrows monoliths weighs more than 25 tonnes.
18 km
Hauling distance
Stones were transported from Brimham Rocks, bypassing gritstone outcrops just 5 km west of the site.
3
Surviving stones
Three pillars stand up to 7 meters tall; records indicate at least five once existed.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Most of these play right now — no account needed. Sign up to save scores, keep a streak, and unlock Debate and Predict. Log in Sign Up
Predict 3 ways this could play out. Back the one you believe — contrarian picks score more when a scenario has a resolution date. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

January 1550 September 2026

4 events Latest: Today
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Study traces Devil's Arrows stones to Brimham Rocks

    Today Research

    Isotopic fingerprinting identifies Brimham Rocks as source, confirms Battle Cross link, rules out glacial transport.

  2. Walbran proposes the Battle Cross theory

    Historical record

    Antiquarian J.R. Walbran suggested a lost Arrow was carved into Aldborough's medieval cross. (19th century)

  3. Local records note a broken-up fallen stone

    Historical record

    Records say locals used part of a fallen stone for Peg Bridge and took the top to Aldborough manor.

  4. Tudor antiquarian records a fourth standing stone

    Historical record

    John Leland recorded a fourth Devil's Arrow; later accounts say it went missing. (c. mid-16th century)

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

1923-2011

Stonehenge bluestone sourcing (1923-2011)

For nearly a century, geologists debated where Stonehenge's smaller bluestones came from. In 1923, H.H. Thomas traced them via petrography to the Preseli Hills in Pembrokeshire, Wales, over 240 kilometers away. Later geochemical work pinpointed specific outcrops, settling the source and reigniting debate over whether glaciers or humans moved them.

Then

The identification confirmed that prehistoric people transported stones over enormous distances.

Now

The sourcing debate became the template for how archaeologists resolve stone provenance, and it exposed how assumptions about what ancient people could do often underestimate them.

Why this matters now

The Devil's Arrows study uses the same logic on a smaller scale: geochemical fingerprinting to trace stones to a distant source, and to rule out glacial transport. Both cases show ancient builders chose specific, far-off landscapes rather than the nearest usable stone.

2019-2020

Stonehenge sarsen stone sourcing (2019-2020)

Researchers used portable X-ray fluorescence to analyze Stonehenge's massive sarsen stones non-destructively. They found most share a single geochemical signature matching West Woods in Wiltshire, about 25 kilometers from the monument, and that the stones likely came from one batch of quarried blocks.

Then

The study resolved where the largest sarsens came from and showed they were sourced from a specific landscape rather than gathered opportunistically.

Now

It demonstrated that modern non-destructive geochemistry can settle long-standing sourcing questions without harming protected monuments.

Why this matters now

Like the sarsen study, the Devil's Arrows analysis used non-destructive sampling to trace megaliths to a deliberate, distant source, strengthening the pattern that Neolithic builders chose stones for cultural reasons beyond mere convenience.

Sources

(7)