Pull to refresh
Logo
Michigan Supreme Court limits sex offender registry law to post-2011 cases

Michigan Supreme Court limits sex offender registry law to post-2011 cases

Rule Changes Holt, MI local

Unanimous ruling forces removal of 20,000 from Michigan's sex offender registry

Overview

Updated Sep 16

Michigan's Supreme Court ruled that the state cannot enforce its sex offender registration law against people whose crimes predate July 1, 2011. The unanimous decision, issued Sept. 9 in People v. Smith, found the 2021 amendments to the registration act are unconstitutional ex post facto punishment for those offenders.

Following the ruling, state police have removed more than 20,000 names from the registry. The decision extends the court's 2021 Betts ruling, which struck down the 2011 registration requirements as retroactive punishment, and lets pre-2011 registrants seek to vacate failure-to-register convictions.

Why it matters

Pre-2011 registrants can now clear failure-to-register convictions, avoiding jail time and public stigma from rules the court called unconstitutional.

Last Monday's email for Holt, MI

Sent Nov 2. It carried:

Get next Monday's: one short email a week. Free. Unsubscribe in one click.

Questions about this story

Free account needed to ask — your question is kept and asked for you right after sign-up. Answers are public.

No questions yet — be the first to ask.

Key Indicators

43,000
Registrants at order
Approximately 43,000 offenders were registered when the court ruled.
20,000
Removed from registry
Names removed by state police as of Sept. 11.
7-0
Unanimous ruling
All Michigan Supreme Court justices agreed Betts applies retroactively.
14
Years of litigation
ACLU and partners have challenged Michigan's SORA since 2012.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

1994 September 2026

11 events Latest: September 11th, 2026 · 2 months ago Showing 8 of 11
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. State police begin removing registrants

    Latest Government Action

    Michigan State Police start removing pre-2011 offenders from the sex offender registry, with more than 20,000 removed by Sept. 11.

  2. New SORA takes effect

    Legislation

    Michigan Legislature passes a new Sex Offenders Registration Act after Betts.

  3. Legislature amends SORA with tiered classifications

    Legislation

    Amendments add three tiers, longer registration periods, and stricter reporting requirements.

  4. Michigan enacts Sex Offender Registration Act

    Legislation

    Michigan creates its sex offender registry, requiring registration for certain offenses.

Scenarios

1

Pre-2011 Convictions Vacated in Mass

Likely Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: State Appellate Defender Office, ACLU of Michigan

The SADO SORA Project and defense attorneys file motions to vacate failure-to-register convictions for pre-2011 offenders. Courts grant these motions, clearing records and potentially leading to hundreds or thousands of vacated convictions across the state.

2

Legislature Overhauls Michigan Sex Offender Registry

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: Michigan Legislature, ACLU of Michigan

The Michigan Legislature passes amendments to the 2021 SORA to address remaining constitutional issues, including individualized risk assessments and removal mechanisms. This would respond to the Shaver ruling and ongoing federal litigation.

3

Federal Court Further Restricts Michigan SORA

Possible Resolves by End of 2027

Discussed by: ACLU of Michigan, federal courts

The federal class action Does v. Whitmer III challenging the 2021 SORA results in a ruling that further restricts the law. This could include findings on vagueness, strict liability, or other constitutional issues.

Historical Context

2 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

March 2003

Smith v. Doe (2003)

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Alaska's sex offender registry, ruling it was a civil regulatory scheme, not punishment. The decision gave states broad latitude to impose registration requirements without triggering criminal procedural protections.

Then

States expanded their registries, adding more offenses and longer registration periods.

Now

The ruling became the legal foundation for sex offender registries nationwide, making it difficult to challenge them as punitive.

Why this matters now

Michigan's Supreme Court departed from this framework in Betts, finding the 2011 SORA was punishment. The Shaver ruling extends that departure by making it retroactive.

August 1798

Calder v. Bull (1798)

The U.S. Supreme Court first articulated the ex post facto doctrine, ruling that laws which punish conduct that was legal when committed violate the Constitution. The case established that retroactive punishment is prohibited.

Then

The ruling set the foundation for ex post facto jurisprudence in American law.

Now

The doctrine has been applied to everything from criminal laws to sex offender registries, protecting citizens from retroactive punishment.

Why this matters now

The Michigan Supreme Court applied this doctrine in Betts and Shaver, ruling that the 2011 SORA amendments were unconstitutional punishment when applied to pre-2011 convictions.

Sources

(8)