Smith v. Doe (2003)
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Alaska's sex offender registry, ruling it was a civil regulatory scheme, not punishment. The decision gave states broad latitude to impose registration requirements without triggering criminal procedural protections.
States expanded their registries, adding more offenses and longer registration periods.
The ruling became the legal foundation for sex offender registries nationwide, making it difficult to challenge them as punitive.
Michigan's Supreme Court departed from this framework in Betts, finding the 2011 SORA was punishment. The Shaver ruling extends that departure by making it retroactive.
