Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why
The unified brain: how we remember

The unified brain: how we remember

New Capabilities
By Newzino Staff |

Scientists challenge fifty years of memory theory with evidence that facts and experiences share the same neural networks

February 3rd, 2026: Study Finds No Neural Difference Between Memory Types

Overview

For over fifty years, neuroscientists have treated remembering facts and recalling personal experiences as fundamentally different brain operations. A February 2026 study in Nature Human Behaviour found they were wrong: when researchers scanned 40 people performing carefully matched memory tasks, they found no measurable difference in brain activity between the two types of recall.

The finding challenges a framework that has organized memory research since psychologist Endel Tulving proposed it in 1972. If confirmed, it could reshape how scientists study memory disorders like Alzheimer's disease—suggesting that the whole brain participates in memory rather than isolated systems that can be targeted individually.

Key Indicators

54
Years Since Tulving's Theory
The episodic-semantic distinction has structured memory research since 1972
40
Study Participants
Adults underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing matched memory tasks
0
Measurable Difference
Researchers found no statistical difference in brain activation patterns between memory types
55M+
People with Dementia Globally
Understanding memory mechanisms could inform new treatment approaches

Interactive

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Sign Up

Debate Arena

Two rounds, two personas, one winner. You set the crossfire.

People Involved

Roni Tibon
Roni Tibon
Assistant Professor, University of Nottingham School of Psychology (Lead author of the 2026 study)
Richard Henson
Richard Henson
Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Cambridge (Senior author on the 2026 study)
Endel Tulving
Endel Tulving
Psychologist, University of Toronto (deceased) (Died September 2023; his 1972 theory is now being challenged)

Organizations Involved

University of Nottingham
University of Nottingham
Research University
Status: Home institution of the study's lead author

British research university whose School of Psychology designed the experimental methodology for testing memory systems.

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Research Institute
Status: Provided neuroimaging analysis for the study

Medical Research Council unit at Cambridge that combines brain imaging with cognitive experiments to study memory, attention, and language.

Timeline

  1. Study Finds No Neural Difference Between Memory Types

    Publication

    Researchers publish in Nature Human Behaviour that functional magnetic resonance imaging of 40 participants shows identical brain activation for episodic and semantic memory retrieval.

  2. Tulving Dies at 96

    Event

    Endel Tulving dies in Toronto. His episodic-semantic distinction remains the organizing framework for memory research worldwide.

  3. Brain Imaging Maps Memory Regions

    Discovery

    Positron emission tomography studies by Tulving and others identify frontal and parietal regions involved in episodic memory, with different activation patterns for encoding versus retrieval.

  4. Tulving Formalizes Memory Theory

    Publication

    Publication of 'Elements of Episodic Memory' establishes the episodic-semantic framework as the dominant model in memory research.

  5. Tulving Proposes Episodic-Semantic Distinction

    Theory

    Endel Tulving publishes a chapter arguing that memory for personal experiences (episodic) and memory for facts (semantic) represent fundamentally different brain systems.

  6. Patient H.M. Reveals Memory Systems

    Discovery

    Brenda Milner reports that Henry Molaison, who had both hippocampi removed to treat epilepsy, cannot form new memories but retains skills—suggesting the brain has multiple memory systems.

Scenarios

1

Replications Confirm Finding, Memory Textbooks Rewritten

Discussed by: Neuroscience News and cognitive psychology researchers interviewed in coverage

Independent laboratories using different experimental paradigms replicate the finding of overlapping neural networks. The episodic-semantic distinction is reframed as a useful behavioral description rather than a neurobiological reality. Memory research pivots toward understanding how a unified system produces different subjective experiences of remembering.

2

Methodological Critiques Limit Impact

Discussed by: Memory researchers who have published on episodic-semantic distinctions

Critics argue the study's task design—matching logos to brand names—may not adequately capture the richness of real episodic memories. Other researchers point to lesion studies and patient data that still show dissociations between memory types. The finding becomes one data point among many rather than a paradigm shift.

3

New Alzheimer's Treatments Target Integrated Memory Networks

Discussed by: Tibon and Henson in their discussion of clinical implications

The finding accelerates research into interventions that support whole-brain memory function rather than targeting isolated systems. Clinical trials begin testing whether therapies designed for 'episodic' memory also benefit 'semantic' recall, potentially expanding the applicability of existing treatments.

4

Refined Theory Emerges: Same Networks, Different Processes

Discussed by: Cognitive neuroscientists interpreting the results

Researchers develop a nuanced framework: the same brain regions participate in both memory types, but the computational processes within those regions differ. This reconciles the new imaging data with decades of behavioral and lesion evidence showing that the two memory types can be affected independently.

Historical Context

Patient H.M. and the Discovery of Memory Systems (1957)

1953-2008

What Happened

Henry Molaison had his hippocampi surgically removed to treat severe epilepsy. Afterward, he could not form new memories of events but could still learn new motor skills. Brenda Milner's studies of him over 50 years demonstrated that the brain contains multiple memory systems.

Outcome

Short Term

Established that the hippocampus is essential for forming new episodic memories but not for procedural learning.

Long Term

Created the conceptual foundation for distinguishing memory types, leading directly to Tulving's 1972 theory.

Why It's Relevant Today

The 2026 study uses imaging to examine the same brain regions H.M. lost, but reaches a different conclusion: that episodic and semantic memory share the same neural networks.

Helicobacter Pylori and the Overturning of Ulcer Theory (1982-2005)

1982-2005

What Happened

Barry Marshall and Robin Warren proposed that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria, not stress and diet as believed for decades. The medical establishment resisted until Marshall famously infected himself to prove the point. They won the Nobel Prize in 2005.

Outcome

Short Term

Initial rejection by the gastroenterology community, with Marshall struggling to publish his findings.

Long Term

Complete transformation of ulcer treatment from surgery and antacids to antibiotics, curing millions.

Why It's Relevant Today

Illustrates how long-standing theoretical frameworks in medicine can be overturned by direct experimental evidence, even when the new finding contradicts decades of research.

Prions and the Protein-Only Hypothesis (1982-1997)

1982-1997

What Happened

Stanley Prusiner proposed that proteins alone—without DNA or RNA—could transmit disease, contradicting the central dogma of molecular biology. The 'prion' concept faced intense skepticism until accumulating evidence led to his 1997 Nobel Prize.

Outcome

Short Term

Years of dismissal from the scientific community; Prusiner later said he was 'ichied' (ignored).

Long Term

Prion diseases are now recognized as a distinct category, and the concept has influenced Alzheimer's research.

Why It's Relevant Today

Demonstrates that fundamental reconceptions of biological processes—like memory organization—can succeed if experimental evidence is robust enough to overcome theoretical inertia.

9 Sources:
+3
ScienceDaily Nature Human Behaviour Neuroscience News Medical Xpress Technology Networks University of Toronto Faculty of Arts & Science Neuron Neuropsychologia MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit