Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why
North Korea's opening salvo: missiles, summits, and power plays

North Korea's opening salvo: missiles, summits, and power plays

Force in Play
By Newzino Staff | |

Pyongyang launches ballistic missiles as Seoul courts Beijing—testing limits in a realigning Northeast Asia

January 4th, 2026: North Korea Fires First Ballistic Missiles of 2026

Overview

North Korea fired multiple ballistic missiles on January 4, 2026, hours before South Korean President Lee Jae Myung departed for Beijing to meet Xi Jinping. The missiles—traveling 900-950 kilometers at 50-kilometer altitudes—were Pyongyang's first weapons test of 2026 and a clear signal to both Seoul and its Chinese patron: don't make deals without us. Just hours before the launch, Kim Jong Un visited a tactical weapons factory and ordered production capacity expanded by 250 percent to meet 2026's "anticipated requirements."

The launch crystallizes North Korea's 2026 strategy of institutionalized aggression paired with calculated diplomacy. After sending over 11,000 troops to fight for Russia in Ukraine—with at least 300 killed and 2,700 wounded by early January—Kim enters the year emboldened by advanced military technology received in return. Lee's four-day state visit to China represents Seoul's attempt to leverage Beijing's economic stranglehold over Pyongyang to restart dialogue. But the missiles, combined with Trump's January 2026 decision to drop denuclearization as a U.S. policy goal, suggest the Peninsula is settling into a new normal: North Korea as a permanent nuclear weapons state.

Key Indicators

900-950 km
Missile flight distance
Range puts all of South Korea and parts of Japan within strike zone
11,000+
North Korean troops in Ukraine
Deployed to Kursk region; 300+ killed, 2,700+ wounded as of January 2026
250%
Production capacity increase ordered
Kim directed tactical weapons factory to expand capacity for 2026 operations
148+
Ballistic missiles sent to Russia
KN-23 missiles supplied in 2024, with 150 more expected in 2025
6 years
Gap between Xi-Kim summits
First formal meeting since Xi's 2019 Pyongyang visit, held September 2025
200+
South Korean business leaders in Beijing
Accompanying Lee on state visit, including Samsung and SK Group chairmen

Interactive

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Sign Up

Debate Arena

Two rounds, two personas, one winner. You set the crossfire.

People Involved

Kim Jong Un
Kim Jong Un
Supreme Leader of North Korea (Ordered 250% weapons production increase; sent New Year's greetings to troops fighting in Russia)
Lee Jae Myung
Lee Jae Myung
President of South Korea (Conducting four-day state visit to China with 200+ business leaders; summit with Xi scheduled January 6)
Xi Jinping
Xi Jinping
President of China and General Secretary of the CCP (Balancing North Korea relations while courting South Korea economically)
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
President of the United States (Dropped denuclearization as policy goal; increased likelihood of Kim summit in 2026)

Organizations Involved

Workers' Party of Korea
Workers' Party of Korea
Ruling Political Party
Status: Preparing for Ninth Congress expected early 2026

The WPK's Ninth Congress in early 2026 is expected to formally institutionalize North Korea's nuclear weapons status.

South Korean Ministry of National Defense
South Korean Ministry of National Defense
Government Agency
Status: Monitoring North Korean missile development and coordinating alliance with U.S.

Seoul's defense ministry detected the January 4 missile launches from near Pyongyang around 7:50am local time.

Timeline

  1. North Korea Fires First Ballistic Missiles of 2026

    Military

    Multiple missiles launched from near Pyongyang flew 900-950km at 50km altitude, hours before Lee's Beijing departure.

  2. Lee Jae Myung Departs for Beijing Summit

    Diplomacy

    South Korean president's first state visit to China, seeking to leverage Beijing's clout over Pyongyang.

  3. Lee Arrives in Beijing With 200+ Business Leaders

    Diplomacy

    South Korean president began four-day state visit with large business delegation including Samsung and SK Group chairmen, first such visit since 2017.

  4. Kim Orders 250% Production Capacity Increase at Weapons Factory

    Military

    Kim Jong Un visited tactical guided weapons facility and ordered production capacity expanded by 250 percent to meet anticipated 2026 requirements.

  5. Kim Praises Troops Fighting in 'Alien Land' for Russia

    Military

    Kim sent New Year's greetings to North Korean soldiers deployed to Russia, hailing them for strengthening the 'invincible alliance' and hinting at more overseas action in 2026.

  6. Kim Oversees Cruise Missile Test

    Military

    Long-range cruise missiles flew above West Sea and hit targets, demonstrating continued weapons development.

  7. Kim Orders Missile Production Increase

    Military

    Supreme Leader instructed factories to boost output to meet 'anticipated requirements' for 2026 missile and artillery operations.

  8. North Korea Tests Ballistic Missile After Submarine Approval

    Military

    Pyongyang's response to Trump's approval of South Korea's nuclear submarine program.

  9. Lee and Xi Meet at APEC Summit

    Diplomacy

    First encounter between South Korea's new president and Chinese leader, described as 'jocular' meeting in South Korea.

  10. Trump Approves South Korea Nuclear Submarine Program

    Defense

    U.S. greenlit Seoul's 30-year quest for nuclear-powered submarines, part of $350 billion investment deal.

  11. North Korea Unveils Hwasong-20 ICBM

    Military

    80th anniversary parade showcased 'most powerful' missile system, believed capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads.

  12. Xi and Kim Meet in Beijing After Six Years

    Diplomacy

    First formal Xi-Kim summit since 2019. China dropped 'denuclearization' from official readout, signaling acceptance of North Korea's nuclear status.

Scenarios

1

North Korea Conducts Nuclear Test, Crisis Erupts

Discussed by: Council on Foreign Relations elevated North Korea to Tier I (high-likelihood, high-impact) conflict for 2026; multiple regional security analysts

Kim Jong Un announces a nuclear weapons test at the Ninth Party Congress in early 2026, ending Pyongyang's self-imposed moratorium since 2017. The test—possibly of a tactical nuclear warhead or miniaturized device—triggers emergency UN Security Council meetings, though China and Russia block new sanctions. South Korea and Japan place militaries on high alert. Trump threatens 'fire and fury' rhetoric, but North Korea's deepened Russia alliance and expanded arsenal make military options riskier than in 2017. The crisis settles into a new normal: North Korea as an acknowledged nuclear weapons state.

2

China Brokers Limited Inter-Korean Dialogue

Discussed by: South Korean intelligence officials and Brookings Institution analysts on China-DPRK relations

Xi Jinping uses the Lee summit to propose a trilateral dialogue framework, positioning China as the indispensable mediator on the Peninsula. Lee accepts, desperate for any diplomatic opening. North Korea initially resists but agrees to low-level talks after China signals potential restrictions on refined oil transfers. The dialogue produces modest humanitarian gestures—family reunions, liaison office reopening—but no progress on denuclearization. Beijing gains strategic leverage over both Koreas, while Washington watches from the sidelines as the regional order tilts toward Chinese influence.

3

Pyongyang Pursues Direct Trump Talks, Bypasses Seoul

Discussed by: South Korean intelligence assessment; NK News analysis; precedent from 2018-2019 Singapore and Hanoi summits

After military provocations establish North Korea's strengthened position, Kim signals willingness to meet Trump directly—likely around the April 2026 Trump-Xi Beijing summit. Trump, eager for a foreign policy win, agrees despite State Department concerns. The talks exclude South Korea entirely, with Pyongyang negotiating a freeze on ICBM tests in exchange for partial sanctions relief and formal recognition. Lee's China-engagement strategy is undermined as North Korea demonstrates it doesn't need Seoul's mediation. The Peninsula remains divided, but with North Korea's nuclear status implicitly acknowledged by Washington.

4

Status Quo: Institutionalized Aggression Without War

Discussed by: The Diplomat's 2026 North Korea strategic preview; RAND Corporation analysis

North Korea continues the pattern established in late 2025: regular missile tests paired with diplomatic overtures to selective partners. The Ninth Party Congress enshrines nuclear weapons into the constitution, but avoids actual nuclear testing to preserve relationships with China and Russia. Lee's outreach to Pyongyang is met with 'institutionalized indifference'—no military escalation, but no dialogue either. The Peninsula settles into a frozen conflict: two hostile states with no diplomatic relations, periodic provocations that don't cross the threshold to war, and Northeast Asia locked in polarized camps (U.S.-ROK-Japan vs. DPRK-China-Russia).

5

Trump-Kim Summit Without Denuclearization Demands

Discussed by: Carnegie Endowment analysis; South Korea's Korea National Diplomatic Academy 2026 outlook; NK News strategic assessment

After dropping denuclearization from U.S. National Security Strategy in January 2026—the first time since 2003—Trump signals willingness to meet Kim as 'equal leaders of nuclear states.' The summit, possibly timed around Trump's April 2026 Beijing visit with Xi, produces a limited deal: North Korea freezes ICBM testing and reduces provocations in exchange for partial sanctions relief and diplomatic normalization. Pyongyang keeps its 50+ warheads and continues short-range missile development. Seoul watches from the sidelines as Washington implicitly recognizes North Korea's nuclear status, fundamentally reshaping Peninsula security architecture.

Historical Context

1994 Nuclear Crisis and Agreed Framework

1993-1994

What Happened

North Korea announced withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty after IAEA inspections revealed undeclared plutonium production. The U.S. considered military strikes on Yongbyon nuclear facility. Former President Jimmy Carter traveled to Pyongyang for direct talks with Kim Il Sung, defusing the crisis. The U.S. and North Korea signed the Agreed Framework in October 1994: Pyongyang froze its plutonium program in exchange for light-water reactors, fuel oil, and diplomatic normalization.

Outcome

Short Term

North Korea froze plutonium production for eight years, delaying its nuclear program.

Long Term

The framework collapsed in 2002 after the Bush administration accused North Korea of pursuing uranium enrichment. North Korea withdrew from the NPT in 2003 and conducted its first nuclear test in 2006.

Why It's Relevant Today

Like 1994, the current crisis involves North Korea leveraging nuclear brinkmanship during great power diplomacy. But today Pyongyang negotiates from strength—it already has 50+ warheads—making a freeze-for-aid deal far less attractive than denuclearization was then.

2017-2018: 'Fire and Fury' to Singapore Summit

2017-2018

What Happened

In 2017, North Korea conducted its sixth and most powerful nuclear test plus multiple ICBM launches, including the Hwasong-15 capable of reaching the U.S. mainland. Trump and Kim exchanged threats ('fire and fury' vs. 'nuclear button on my desk'). Then North Korea pivoted to diplomacy during the 2018 Winter Olympics, leading to three Trump-Kim summits in Singapore, Hanoi, and the DMZ. The Hanoi summit collapsed when North Korea demanded full sanctions relief for partial denuclearization.

Outcome

Short Term

Diplomatic engagement temporarily halted North Korea's nuclear and ICBM testing from late 2017 through 2019.

Long Term

After Hanoi's collapse, North Korea resumed short- and medium-range missile tests. The diplomatic window closed, and North Korea continued expanding its arsenal, now estimated at 50+ warheads with submarine-launched and tactical capabilities.

Why It's Relevant Today

History suggests Kim may seek another Trump summit after demonstrating military strength. But the 2026 context differs: North Korea now has Russia as a military technology supplier and China as an accepted patron, reducing dependence on U.S. engagement.

2000 Kim Dae-jung Sunshine Policy and Summit

1998-2000

What Happened

South Korean President Kim Dae-jung pursued unconditional engagement with North Korea, providing economic aid and cultural exchanges. In June 2000, he traveled to Pyongyang for the first-ever inter-Korean summit with Kim Jong Il, producing a joint declaration on reunification principles. Kim Dae-jung won the Nobel Peace Prize. Behind the scenes, South Korea paid $500 million to secure the summit.

Outcome

Short Term

The summit led to temporary family reunions, economic cooperation, and reduced military tensions through 2002.

Long Term

Progress stalled after the 2002 uranium enrichment crisis. Conservative South Korean presidents later abandoned the Sunshine Policy. North Korea continued weapons development regardless of Seoul's engagement approach.

Why It's Relevant Today

Lee Jae Myung's China-mediated outreach echoes the Sunshine Policy's engagement philosophy. But Kim Jong Un has explicitly rejected inter-Korean reconciliation, declaring South Korea a 'hostile state' in 2024. The 2026 environment—with North Korea nuclear-armed and aligned with Russia—makes the Sunshine approach far less viable than in 2000.

24 Sources:
+18
Bloomberg The Defense Post Al Jazeera The Korea Herald Euronews Naval News PBS NewsHour The Diplomat Council on Foreign Relations Wikipedia Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Arms Control Association The Manila Times GlobalSecurity.org (KCNA) NK News South China Morning Post Xinhua CNN Al Jazeera Al Jazeera Euronews Carnegie Endowment for International Peace South China Morning Post Al Jazeera