Overview
Russia launched nine ballistic missiles and 165 drones at Ukraine overnight on January 4-5, 2026, killing two people in Kyiv—the capital's first deaths of the year—and setting a medical facility ablaze. Hours later, Russia struck Kharkiv with five more missiles, causing "very serious damage" to energy infrastructure and leaving the nation's second-largest city struggling with heating and water in freezing temperatures. The massive strikes came as military chiefs prepared to meet in Paris on January 5-6 to finalize security guarantees, continuing Russia's systematic campaign to destroy Ukraine's energy grid and break civilian morale while diplomats negotiate peace.
Nearly four years into the war, Russia occupies 20% of Ukraine and has suffered over 1.2 million total casualties according to Ukrainian counts, while Ukraine has lost at least 46,000 killed. In a dramatic leadership shift signaling the seriousness of peace negotiations, Zelenskyy appointed intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov as presidential chief of staff on January 2, replacing longtime aide Andriy Yermak. Trump claims teams are "maybe very close" to a deal he says is "90% ready," but the final 10% contains the war's thorniest question: which territory stays Russian, and which gets fought over until someone breaks.
Key Indicators
People Involved
Organizations Involved
Ukraine's military has evolved from 200,000 troops pre-war to a battle-hardened force facing a war of attrition.
Russia's military has suffered catastrophic casualties while grinding forward through eastern Ukraine.
Timeline
-
Nine Missiles, 165 Drones Strike Kyiv
MilitaryRussia killed two in Kyiv—first capital deaths of 2026—striking medical facility ahead of peace talks.
-
Russia Strikes Kharkiv Energy Grid
MilitaryFive Russian missiles hit Kharkiv's energy infrastructure, causing "very serious damage" to heating and water systems in freezing temperatures. At least one civilian injured.
-
National Security Advisors Meet in Kyiv
DiplomaticFirst meeting of Coalition of the Willing national security advisors held in Ukraine to discuss peace proposals and security guarantees.
-
Zelenskyy Appoints Budanov as Chief of Staff
LeadershipZelenskyy named military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov as presidential chief of staff, replacing Andriy Yermak. The appointment signals focus on security and peace talks.
-
Fedorov Nominated as Defense Minister
LeadershipZelenskyy nominated Mykhailo Fedorov, drone and digitalization specialist, as defense minister amid military restructuring.
-
Trump-Putin Phone Call
DiplomaticTrump held two-hour phone call with Putin discussing "a lot of points."
-
Trump-Zelenskyy Mar-a-Lago Meeting
DiplomaticTrump and Zelenskyy met; Trump claimed teams are "maybe very close" to peace deal.
-
653 Drones Strike Energy Grid
MilitaryRussia launched 653 drones, 36 cruise missiles, 17 ballistic missiles, hitting power infrastructure.
-
Witkoff Coaches Putin Aide
DiplomaticLeaked recording reveals Trump envoy advising Russian official on how to pitch peace plan.
-
Russia Launches 800+ Drones
MilitaryRussia's largest single-night drone attack hit Ukraine with over 800 Shahed drones.
-
Putin Rejects Ceasefire
StatementPutin declared Russian-Ukrainian terms "absolutely contradictory," rejecting unconditional ceasefire.
-
Operation Spider Web
MilitaryUkraine struck Russian airfields deep inside Russia using truck-transported drones.
-
U.S.-Russia Talks Without Ukraine
DiplomaticAmerican and Russian officials met in Saudi Arabia without Ukrainian representatives present.
-
Trump Takes Office
PoliticalTrump inaugurated as 47th U.S. president, promising to end the Ukraine war quickly.
-
Kurakhove Falls to Russia
MilitaryRussian forces captured the strategic city of Kurakhove in eastern Ukraine.
-
Russia Captures Vuhledar
MilitaryRussian forces seized the long-held city after reducing it to a sprawling ruin.
-
Ukraine Launches Kursk Offensive
MilitaryUkraine's surprise cross-border offensive captured 1,250 sq km of Russian territory before stalling.
-
Zelenskyy Replaces Top General
LeadershipZelenskyy replaced Commander Zaluzhnyi with General Oleksandr Syrsky amid strategic disagreements.
-
Russia Invades Ukraine
MilitaryRussia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, marking the largest European land war since World War II.
Scenarios
Trump-Brokered Ceasefire Along Current Lines
Discussed by: CSIS, The Washington Post, NPR analysts covering U.S. security guarantees proposal
Trump pressures both sides into accepting a frozen conflict along current battle lines, with Ukraine receiving 15-year U.S. security guarantees (far short of the 50 years Kyiv requested). Russia keeps its 20% territorial gains but doesn't get the full Donbas region Putin demands. Ukraine doesn't join NATO but gets Western arms commitments. The deal holds for a few years but neither side considers it legitimate—Putin sees it as a temporary pause before taking more territory, Zelenskyy sees it as buying time to rebuild defenses. Frequent violations and skirmishes continue. This scenario appeals to Trump's desire for a quick diplomatic win but satisfies neither Moscow nor Kyiv's fundamental goals.
Talks Collapse, Russia Intensifies for Maximum Leverage
Discussed by: CSIS assessment of Putin's 2026 strategy, Atlantic Council analysis of Russian military capacity
The 90% complete peace plan falls apart over territorial disputes—Putin demands all of Donbas including areas Russia hasn't captured, Zelenskyy refuses to cede land where his forces still fight. Russia responds by escalating its drone and missile campaign beyond even January 5's intensity, targeting Kyiv systematically to force capitulation. Putin bets Trump will cut Ukraine aid if talks fail, leaving Kyiv vulnerable. Ukraine's intercept rates continue declining as Russia floods attacks with 1,000+ drones weekly. Energy infrastructure collapses. Millions flee westward. Trump blames Zelenskyy for being unreasonable. European allies scramble to fill the U.S. aid gap but can't match previous support levels. The war grinds into late 2026 with Russia making incremental gains.
Ukraine Accepts Painful Deal to Secure U.S. Support
Discussed by: Ukrainian officials quoted in CBS News and PBS NewsHour discussing compromise positions
Facing Trump's implied threat to cut aid and Russia's relentless attacks on civilian infrastructure, Zelenskyy accepts a deal he publicly calls unjust but necessary. Ukraine cedes significant eastern territory—not all of Donbas but more than current battle lines—in exchange for rapid-track EU membership, long-term U.S. and European security guarantees, and massive reconstruction funding. Ukraine agrees to neutrality (no NATO) but maintains a large, Western-armed military. Putin declares victory domestically, though he didn't achieve his maximum goals. Ukrainian public outcry is intense; Zelenskyy's approval craters but he argues it saved the nation from collapse. The agreement holds uneasily, with both sides preparing for potential future conflict.
Internal Russian Pressures Force Putin Toward Compromise
Discussed by: Analysts citing December 2025 VTsIOM polling showing majority of Russians expect war to end in 2026
After over 1 million casualties, a state pollster finds a majority of Russians expect the war to end in 2026—a signal the Kremlin may be testing public acceptance of a settlement. Economic strain from sanctions, oil production disruptions from Ukrainian strikes, and the unsustainability of losing 1,500+ soldiers daily creates internal pressure. Putin accepts a deal closer to current lines without getting all of Donbas, selling it domestically as having achieved the core goal of protecting Russian-speakers and blocking NATO expansion. He keeps Crimea and most occupied territory but doesn't get the unconditional victory he initially sought. This scenario requires Putin to judge that continuing the war costs more than an imperfect peace.
Historical Context
Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989)
1979-1989What Happened
The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in December 1979 to prop up a communist government, triggering a decade-long insurgency. The U.S. and allies armed Afghan mujahideen fighters with weapons including Stinger missiles that neutralized Soviet air superiority. What began as a quick intervention became a grinding war of attrition that killed 15,000 Soviet soldiers and wounded 50,000 while devastating Afghanistan. Soviet forces withdrew in defeat by February 1989.
Outcome
Short term: Soviet withdrawal led to civil war and eventual Taliban takeover of Afghanistan.
Long term: The war accelerated the Soviet Union's economic decline and contributed to its collapse in 1991, demonstrating the limits of military power against determined insurgency backed by external support.
Why It's Relevant
Like Afghanistan showed the Soviets, the Ukraine war reveals limits of Russian conventional military power when the invaded nation receives massive Western support. Both conflicts featured a larger power invading a neighbor, facing unexpectedly fierce resistance, suffering unsustainable casualties, and discovering that military superiority doesn't guarantee political victory.
Korean War Armistice (1950-1953)
1950-1953What Happened
North Korea's invasion of South Korea in June 1950 triggered a three-year war involving Chinese and Soviet support for the North and U.S.-led UN forces supporting the South. After massive casualties on all sides and territorial gains that ultimately left both sides near the original border, an armistice was signed in July 1953—not a peace treaty, just a ceasefire. The war killed an estimated 3 million people and left Korea divided at the 38th parallel.
Outcome
Short term: The armistice created a heavily militarized DMZ and froze the territorial status quo with no formal peace.
Long term: Seventy years later, North and South Korea remain technically at war, maintaining massive military forces and periodic tensions. The frozen conflict has defined the peninsula's geopolitics for generations.
Why It's Relevant
A potential Ukraine settlement along current battle lines without resolving the fundamental territorial dispute would mirror Korea's armistice—freezing the conflict without ending it. Both sides would remain armed and hostile, with periodic escalations likely. The comparison raises the question: would a quick ceasefire create lasting peace or just a 70-year frozen conflict?
Vietnam War Paris Peace Accords (1973)
1973What Happened
After years of negotiations, the U.S. and North Vietnam signed the Paris Peace Accords in January 1973, which were supposed to end American involvement while preserving South Vietnam. The agreement included a ceasefire, withdrawal of U.S. forces, and provisions for South Vietnamese self-determination. Nixon and Kissinger hailed it as "peace with honor." Within two years, North Vietnam violated the accords, invaded the South, and unified Vietnam under communist rule in 1975 as the U.S. declined to re-intervene.
Outcome
Short term: The accords allowed the U.S. to withdraw while claiming to have secured South Vietnam's future, but fighting resumed almost immediately.
Long term: South Vietnam collapsed completely within 26 months, proving the peace agreement was a face-saving mechanism for American withdrawal rather than a durable settlement.
Why It's Relevant
Trump's push for a quick Ukraine deal raises the Vietnam parallel: is this a genuine peace or a face-saving exit that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future Russian aggression? Like Paris 1973, any agreement that doesn't address the fundamental power imbalance and relies on Western security guarantees that may not be enforced could simply delay rather than prevent Ukraine's defeat.