Logo
Bombers Over the Sea of Japan: US–Japan Answer China–Russia’s Show of Force

Bombers Over the Sea of Japan: US–Japan Answer China–Russia’s Show of Force

A radar scare, joint China–Russia patrols, and B-52s with Japanese fighters push East Asia’s air standoff into a new phase.

Overview

First China’s Liaoning carrier fighters lit up Japanese jets with radar near Okinawa. Then Chinese and Russian bombers circled Japan and brushed South Korea’s air-defense zone. Now two US B-52s have flown in formation with six Japanese fighters over the Sea of Japan, a nuclear-capable calling card aimed straight at Beijing and Moscow.

The drills are about more than flight paths. Japan’s new prime minister has openly talked about responding if China attacks Taiwan, Beijing is lashing back with military pressure and economic threats, and Washington is trying to reassure Tokyo without tipping into a clash. The question is whether this bomber diplomacy stabilizes the region—or creates the next close call.

Key Indicators

2
US B-52 bombers in latest US–Japan drill
Shows Washington is willing to deploy nuclear-capable assets to signal resolve alongside Japan.
11
Chinese and Russian aircraft in Dec. 9 joint patrol
A mixed bomber–fighter package that forced Japan and South Korea to scramble jets.
30 minutes
Duration of Chinese radar illumination of JASDF jets
Japan says its F-15s were intermittently painted by Chinese fighter radar near Okinawa.
100 km
Distance from Taiwan to nearest Japanese territory
Geography that underpins Tokyo’s claim a Taiwan conflict could threaten Japan’s survival.

People Involved

Sanae Takaichi
Sanae Takaichi
Prime Minister of Japan (Facing sharp Chinese backlash over Taiwan comments while leaning on US security guarantees)
Shinjiro Koizumi
Shinjiro Koizumi
Japan’s Minister of Defense (Overseeing crisis response to Chinese radar incident and joint China–Russia patrols)
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
President of the United States (Publicly quiet on the flare-up while his administration greenlights visible bomber support)
Xi Jinping
Xi Jinping
President of the People’s Republic of China (Authorizing military and economic pressure on Japan while rejecting all blame for escalation)
Admiral Samuel Paparo
Admiral Samuel Paparo
Commander, US Indo-Pacific Command (Directing US bomber presence and allied drills across the Western Pacific)
Lai Ching-te
Lai Ching-te
President of Taiwan (Condemning nearby Chinese drills while welcoming stronger Japanese and US signaling)
Admiral Dong Jun
Admiral Dong Jun
China’s Minister of National Defense (Defending PLA drills as lawful while rejecting Japan’s radar-incident protests)

Organizations Involved

Ministry of Defense of Japan
Ministry of Defense of Japan
Government Ministry
Status: Coordinating air responses and messaging after Chinese radar locks and joint patrols

Japan’s defense bureaucracy and Self-Defense Forces headquarters, now operating at the front line of great-power friction.

Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF)
Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF)
Military Service
Status: Scrambling fighters almost daily to shadow Chinese and Russian aircraft around Japan

Japan’s air arm flies the F-15s and F-35s now nose-to-nose with Chinese and Russian jets.

US Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM)
US Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM)
Unified Combatant Command
Status: Running bomber deployments and joint drills with Japan and South Korea

The US military’s largest regional command, responsible for making deterrence in Asia visible from the air.

People’s Liberation Army (PLA) – including PLA Navy and Naval Aviation
People’s Liberation Army (PLA) – including PLA Navy and Naval Aviation
National Military
Status: Expanding bomber patrols and carrier operations near Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea

China’s military uses drills, bomber patrols, and radar locks to push back on Japan and the US.

Russian Aerospace Forces
Russian Aerospace Forces
Military Service
Status: Providing Tu-95 bombers and support aircraft for joint patrols with China near Japan

Russia’s air arm adds nuclear-capable bombers to China’s patrols, complicating Japan’s air-defense picture.

Timeline

  1. Japan and US frame bomber drill as warning against forceful status-quo changes

    Statement

    Tokyo announces the B-52 drill and says Japan and the US reaffirmed their strong resolve to prevent any unilateral attempt to change the regional status quo by force, clearly signaling China and Russia after weeks of tensions over Taiwan and the radar incident.

  2. US B-52s drill with Japanese fighters over Sea of Japan

    Military Exercise

    Two US B-52 strategic bombers fly in formation with six Japanese fighters—three F-35s and three F-15s—over the Sea of Japan, in the first prominent US airpower display since China’s carrier drills and the China–Russia bomber patrol.

  3. US backs Japan on radar incident, criticizes China

    Diplomatic

    Washington publicly condemns the Chinese radar illumination of Japanese aircraft as detrimental to regional peace, reaffirms its "unwavering" commitment to Japan, and implicitly links the incident to growing Chinese pressure after Takaichi’s Taiwan remarks.

  4. Chinese and Russian bombers circle Japan; Seoul and Tokyo scramble fighters

    Military Exercise

    Two Russian Tu-95 bombers join two Chinese H-6 bombers, escorted by Chinese J-16s and a Russian A-50, for a long-range patrol from the Sea of Japan through the East China Sea and western Pacific around Japan. South Korea and Japan send fighters aloft as the package repeatedly enters their air-defense zones.

  5. China rejects radar-incident protest as fabricated

    Statement

    China’s Foreign Ministry dismisses Japan’s complaint over "radar illumination," accuses Japanese jets of harassing normal PLA training, and says Tokyo is hyping the issue to build tension and mislead the international community.

  6. Chinese carrier fighters lock radar on Japanese F-15s, Tokyo says

    Military Incident

    Japan’s Defense Ministry reports that J-15 fighters from the carrier Liaoning intermittently illuminated two JASDF F-15s with radar southeast of Okinawa in two separate episodes, calling the moves dangerous and lodging a formal protest with Beijing.

  7. Beijing warns citizens against travel to Japan

    Economic / Diplomatic

    China’s embassy in Tokyo issues a notice urging Chinese citizens to avoid travel to Japan, citing "significant risks" after Takaichi’s remarks, while Tokyo protests an incendiary social media post by China’s consul general in Osaka.

  8. China summons Japanese ambassador over Taiwan remarks

    Diplomatic

    China’s vice foreign minister hauls in Japan’s ambassador to denounce Takaichi’s Taiwan comments and warns that any interference in "reunification" will be met with a hard response, triggering a broader diplomatic row.

  9. Japan’s new PM links Taiwan war to Japan’s survival

    Political Statement

    Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi tells parliament that a Chinese attack on Taiwan involving force could be a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, implying Tokyo could deploy Self-Defense Forces under collective self-defense laws.

  10. Third trilateral bomber flight of 2025

    Military Exercise

    Two US B-52H bombers are escorted by Japanese F-2s and South Korean KF-16s over the Pacific, further institutionalizing bomber-escort drills promised at the 2023 Camp David summit.

  11. US, Japan, South Korea run bomber escort drill

    Military Exercise

    Two US B-1B bombers fly between Japan and South Korea escorted by Japanese and Korean fighters, showcasing deepening trilateral air cooperation and normalizing bomber presence in the region.

Scenarios

1

Bomber Drills Become the New Normal, Not a Prelude to Crisis

Discussed by: Security analysts quoted in Reuters, the Wall Street Journal, and regional think-tank commentary

In this scenario, the December B-52 flight proves to be one step in a managed pattern: China and Russia continue periodic joint patrols, Japan keeps scrambling fighters, and the US and its allies answer with regularized bomber drills and trilateral flights. Hotline use and professional intercept protocols hold, so near-misses don’t turn into accidents. Takaichi tones down public Taiwan talk, China eases some economic pressure, and the story recedes into the background as a tense but stable airpower chess game.

2

Radar Lock Turns into Collision, Forcing an Emergency Summit

Discussed by: Former pilots and risk experts warning about crowded airspace in East Asia

Here, another radar illumination or aggressive intercept goes wrong: a Chinese or Japanese fighter misjudges distance, clips a wing, or dumps flares too close in cloud. A jet goes down, the pilot ejects—or doesn’t—and nationalist outrage explodes on both sides. Markets wobble, and Washington, Beijing, and Tokyo scramble to convene crisis talks. The US might surge additional bombers and carriers while calling for restraint; China could temporarily close airspace near Taiwan. The incident would probably produce new rules-of-the-road, but only after a dangerous spike in escalation risk.

3

US–Japan–South Korea Formalize ‘Bomber Shield’ Over Northeast Asia

Discussed by: Alliance hawks in Tokyo, Washington, and Seoul

Building on the January and July bomber escorts and December’s B-52 drill, the three allies decide to regularize a rotational "bomber shield"—scheduled patrol corridors flown by US bombers with Japanese and South Korean escorts, publicly messaged as a response to China–Russia patrols and North Korean threats. Japan accelerates spending on air defenses and bases in the southwest islands, while Seoul deepens data-sharing despite anxiety about provoking Beijing. China and Russia respond with more joint flights but also ramp up diplomatic efforts to paint the bloc as an emerging Asian NATO.

4

Quiet Deal Takes Heat Out of Radar and Bomber Standoff

Discussed by: Diplomats and business groups worried about economic fallout

Faced with spooked companies and tourism flows at risk, Tokyo and Beijing quietly look for an off-ramp. Through back channels and ASEAN or EU intermediaries, they agree not to publicize every intercept, to avoid radar illumination in certain zones, and to restart suspended defense hotlines at higher tempo. China tones down its travel warnings and import threats; Japan stops naming individual PLA units in its press releases. US bomber flights continue but with less fanfare, while Takaichi shifts focus back to domestic reforms. Tensions remain, yet the air brinkmanship no longer dominates headlines.

Historical Context

2013 China–Japan ADIZ Showdown Over the East China Sea

2013–2014

What Happened

In 2013, China abruptly declared an Air Defense Identification Zone over the East China Sea that overlapped Japan’s own claims around the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. The US immediately flew B‑52 bombers through the new zone without complying with Chinese rules, while Japan ordered its airlines to ignore Beijing’s instructions, turning flight plans into a sovereignty dispute.

Outcome

Short term: No shots were fired, but intercepts surged and political ties plunged as both sides refused to back down.

Long term: China normalized more assertive air operations, and Japan quietly hardened its air defenses—much like today.

Why It's Relevant

Shows how bomber flights and airspace rules become tools of political signaling, not just military planning.

2013 Radar-Lock Dispute Between Chinese and Japanese Forces

January–February 2013

What Happened

Japan accused a Chinese frigate of locking fire-control radar on a Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer near the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. Beijing initially denied the allegation before later offering a more ambiguous account; both sides traded accusations of dangerous behavior, echoing the current radar-illumination fight over Okinawa.

Outcome

Short term: The incident spiked fears of miscalculation but faded without shots fired, after quiet diplomatic contact.

Long term: It became a textbook case in how contested radar incidents can inflame nationalist politics on both sides.

Why It's Relevant

Highlights how hard it is to prove intent in radar disputes—and how easily they can escalate political narratives.

2001 EP-3 Collision and Hainan Island Standoff

April 2001

What Happened

A US Navy EP‑3 surveillance plane collided midair with a Chinese fighter over the South China Sea, killing the Chinese pilot and forcing the EP‑3 to make an emergency landing on Hainan Island. China detained the US crew for 11 days, sparking a diplomatic standoff until Washington issued a carefully worded letter of regret.

Outcome

Short term: The crisis ended without war but froze military-to-military contacts and raised alarm about unsafe intercepts.

Long term: It pushed both sides toward better incident-avoidance talks, yet dangerous intercepts have continued sporadically.

Why It's Relevant

Illustrates how a single mishap in crowded skies can trigger a geopolitical crisis—exactly the risk now facing Japan, China, and the US.