Remote work emerges as unexpected driver of higher birth rates

Overview

The United States has been having fewer babies every year since 2007. Recessions make it worse. So when the worst economic shock in decades hit in 2020, demographers expected another steep drop. Instead, something unusual happened: births to American-born mothers rose by 71,000 in 2021, the first reversal in over a decade. A team of economists from Northwestern, Princeton, and the University of California, Los Angeles traced the increase to a single variable—whether a woman's job could be done from home.

In This Story

Remote work becomes an explicit tool in national fertility policy

3 Context

The Post-War Baby Boom (1946–1964)

Key Indicators

71,000

Additional births to U.S.-born mothers in 2021

Net increase above pre-pandemic trend, driven largely by college-educated women in remote-friendly occupations.

14%

Fertility boost for dual work-from-home couples

Stanford study across 38 countries found realized fertility was 14% higher when both partners worked from home at least one day per week.

1.599

U.S. total fertility rate in 2024

Record low, down from 2.1 in 2007. The remote work effect has not reversed the broader decline.

23%

Share of U.S. workers with some remote work

Up from 19.5% in August 2023 to 23% in August 2024, despite high-profile return-to-office mandates.

Interactive

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Debate Arena

Two rounds, two personas, one winner. You set the crossfire.

People Involved

Hannes Schwandt

Economist, Northwestern University (Lead author of the 2022 NBER baby bump paper)

Nick Bloom

Economist, Stanford University (Leading researcher on remote work and fertility)

Lyman Stone

Research Fellow, Institute for Family Studies (Key researcher connecting remote work to family formation)

Martha Bailey

Economist, University of California, Los Angeles (Co-author of the 2022 NBER baby bump paper)

Organizations Involved

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Research Organization

Status: Published foundational working paper

The NBER is the leading nonprofit economic research organization in the United States, responsible for publishing the working paper series that first documented the remote-work fertility connection.

Economic Innovation Group

Research and Policy Organization

Status: Published supporting research on remote work and family formation

A bipartisan policy research organization whose 2023 study with Lyman Stone extended the fertility findings by documenting remote workers' higher intentions to have children and marry.

Timeline

U.S. fertility rate hits record low of 1.599
Demographic

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that the total fertility rate fell to 1.599 children per woman in 2024, a new record low. The remote work fertility boost, while real, has not been large enough to reverse the broader structural decline.
April 1st, 2025
Stanford study finds 14% fertility boost across 38 countries
Research

Nick Bloom and co-authors publish findings from over 11,000 respondents showing that couples where both partners work from home at least one day per week have 14% higher realized fertility. They estimate universal work-from-home access could add 100,000 U.S. births per year.
January 29th, 2025
Brookings convenes panel on 'right to remote work' and fertility
Policy

The Brookings Institution hosts a panel examining whether a legal right to request flexible work could combat declining birth rates, reflecting the research's growing influence on policy discussions.
October 24th, 2024
Amazon mandates five-day office return
Policy

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy orders all 350,000 corporate employees back to the office five days a week starting January 2025, the most aggressive return-to-office mandate among major tech companies.
September 16th, 2024
EIG study confirms remote workers plan more children
Research

Lyman Stone and Adam Ozimek publish survey data from 3,000 American women showing that remote-working women are more likely to intend to have a baby than office-only workers, particularly among older, wealthier, and more educated women.
March 1st, 2023
NBER study links baby bump to remote work
Research

Economists Martha Bailey, Janet Currie, and Hannes Schwandt publish a working paper analyzing the universe of U.S. birth records from 2015 to 2021. They find a net increase of roughly 46,000 additional births among U.S.-born mothers, with the gains concentrated in demographics with high remote work access.
October 19th, 2022
Baby bump emerges: first fertility reversal since 2007
Demographic

Births to U.S.-born mothers rise by 71,000 above the pre-pandemic trend, the first increase since the Great Recession. The bump is concentrated among college-educated women in remote-work-friendly occupations.
December 31st, 2021
2020 shows apparent baby bust, but data misleads
Demographic

Total U.S. births fall 4% in 2020. However, 60% of the decline comes from a sharp drop in births to foreign-born mothers, largely due to immigration restrictions. Births to U.S.-born mothers fall only modestly.
December 31st, 2020
Pandemic lockdowns begin; remote work surges
Structural Shift

The World Health Organization declares a pandemic. Within weeks, tens of millions of American workers shift to remote work, fundamentally changing the relationship between employment and physical presence.
March 11th, 2020
Great Recession triggers fertility decline
Economic

The financial crisis accelerates the fertility drop. Over the next five years, roughly 2.3 million fewer babies are born than pre-recession trends would have predicted.
September 15th, 2008
U.S. births peak at 4.3 million
Demographic

The United States records its highest number of births in two decades. The total fertility rate stands at 2.1 children per woman, matching the replacement level. An unbroken decline begins the following year.
January 1st, 2007

Scenarios

Remote work becomes an explicit tool in national fertility policy

Discussed by: Brookings Institution, Stanford economists including Nick Bloom, Institute for Family Studies researchers

Governments adopt legal rights to request remote work, partly justified by fertility research. Bloom's estimate of 100,000 additional U.S. births per year gains traction in policy circles. Several countries already moving in this direction: the United Kingdom enacted a right to request flexible work in 2024, and similar proposals are under discussion in the European Union. If the evidence continues to accumulate, the political appeal of a low-cost, employer-funded fertility intervention could prove irresistible—especially as cash-based pronatalist programs in countries like South Korea and Hungary show diminishing returns.

Return-to-office mandates erode fertility gains before policy catches up

Discussed by: Labor economists, remote work researchers, financial press covering Amazon and Google RTO mandates

Major employers continue pushing five-day office mandates, and corporate norms shift back toward in-person work. The fertility boost documented in 2021 proves to be a one-time pandemic anomaly rather than a durable shift. If the share of workers with remote access plateaus or declines, the demographic dividend disappears before governments can institutionalize it. The tension between corporate return-to-office pressure and the measured fertility benefits of flexibility becomes a live policy conflict.

Remote work lifts fertility for educated workers but widens demographic inequality

Discussed by: Demographers studying the education gradient in fertility, Economic Innovation Group researchers

The fertility boost concentrates among college-educated, higher-income women whose jobs permit remote work, while lower-income women in service, retail, and manufacturing jobs see no benefit. The existing research already points in this direction: the 2022 NBER study found the baby bump was most pronounced among college-educated women. If this pattern holds, remote work could widen an already growing fertility gap between educational classes, complicating the political case for it as a universal demographic solution.

Effect proves real but marginal against deeper structural decline

Discussed by: CDC demographers, global fertility researchers, Lancet Global Burden of Disease study authors

The research consensus solidifies that remote work genuinely boosts fertility at the margin. But the U.S. total fertility rate continues falling anyway, driven by forces far larger than work arrangements: rising housing costs, delayed marriage, shifting cultural norms around parenthood, and growing economic uncertainty for young adults. Remote work becomes one useful tool among many rather than a transformative solution. The 2024 record-low fertility rate of 1.599, reached during a period of historically high remote work access, already suggests this may be the most realistic outcome.

Historical Context

The Post-War Baby Boom (1946–1964)

1946–1964

What Happened

Following World War II, a combination of returning soldiers, rising wages, the GI Bill's education and housing benefits, and rapid suburbanization fueled the largest sustained fertility increase in American history. The total fertility rate peaked at 3.7 children per woman in 1957. The boom added roughly 76 million Americans over 18 years.

Outcome

Short Term

Massive demand for housing, schools, and consumer goods drove two decades of economic expansion and suburban development.

Long Term

The Baby Boom generation reshaped American politics, culture, and economics for 70 years. Its end in the mid-1960s, driven by the birth control pill and women entering the workforce, began the fertility decline still underway today.

Why It's Relevant Today

The Baby Boom shows that structural changes in how people live and work—not just cash incentives—drive large fertility shifts. The GI Bill made homeownership and family formation economically feasible for millions; remote work may be playing an analogous role by making parenthood logistically feasible for dual-income couples.

The Great Recession baby bust (2008–2013)

2008–2013

What Happened

The financial crisis triggered the steepest fertility decline since the 1970s. Roughly 2.3 million fewer babies were born than pre-recession trends predicted. States with the sharpest drops in housing prices and employment saw the largest fertility declines. Surveys found 14% of adults under 35 delayed having children specifically because of the recession.

Outcome

Short Term

Birth rates fell every year from 2008 through 2013, dropping from a total fertility rate of 2.1 to approximately 1.86.

Long Term

Most of the "missing" births were never recovered. The fertility rate never returned to replacement level, establishing the downward trajectory that continued through the pandemic.

Why It's Relevant Today

The Great Recession established the baseline expectation that economic crises suppress fertility. The 2020 pandemic defied this pattern for U.S.-born mothers, which is precisely what made the remote work finding so striking to demographers—it identified a mechanism strong enough to counteract the normal recessionary effect.

Hungary's pronatalist experiment (2010–present)

2010–present

What Happened

Under Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Hungary launched one of the most aggressive pronatalist programs in the developed world, eventually spending over 5% of its gross domestic product on fertility incentives. Measures included lifetime income tax exemptions for mothers of four or more children, subsidized vehicle purchases for large families, and generous housing loans forgiven after the birth of a third child.

Outcome

Short Term

Hungary's total fertility rate rose from 1.25 in 2010 to 1.6 in 2021, a 28% increase and one of the largest gains in Europe.

Long Term

The rate has since plateaued and begun declining again, consistent with the pattern seen in other countries where cash incentives produce a temporary timing shift rather than a permanent change in family size.

Why It's Relevant Today

Hungary's experience illustrates the limits of the financial approach to fertility. Despite spending more as a share of its economy than almost any other country, the gains were modest and appear to be fading. The remote work research suggests that time flexibility may address a constraint that money alone cannot, though at a far lower cost.