U.S. ‘War on Terror’ drone strike era (targeted killings outside conventional battlefields)
After 9/11, the U.S. normalized targeted killing as a counterterror tool, often justified by self-defense and intelligence assessments. The strikes became tactically effective but strategically controversial, with recurring disputes over civilian harm, transparency, and legality.
Expanded U.S. reach and tempo of lethal action against non-state actors.
Enduring legal, moral, and credibility costs that shaped future oversight demands.
This campaign borrows the ‘terrorism’ frame and the video-as-deterrence logic—inviting the same legal fight.
