Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why
America's $300 billion bet on AI-powered manufacturing

America's $300 billion bet on AI-powered manufacturing

New Capabilities
By Newzino Staff | |

How Washington Plans to Out-Build China Using Artificial Intelligence

December 27th, 2025: NIST Launches $20M MITRE AI Centers

Overview

The U.S. government is pouring hundreds of billions into making factories smarter—but the strategy is hitting turbulence. On December 27, 2025, NIST announced $20 million for two AI centers with MITRE to automate manufacturing and defend critical infrastructure from cyberattacks. Days earlier, on December 11, Trump signed an executive order creating an AI Litigation Task Force to sue states over their own AI regulations, while on December 10 the Commerce Department abruptly terminated a $285 million CHIPS Act contract with SMART USA Institute despite the organization meeting all performance targets. The goal remains unchanged: use artificial intelligence to close a widening gap with China, which installed 295,000 industrial robots in 2024 alone—nine times America's total.

The stakes are existential for U.S. economic security, but execution is proving messy. American manufacturing has shrunk from 15% of GDP to 9.4% over two decades, and factories can't find workers with AI and robotics skills—500,000 jobs sit empty. Meanwhile, ransomware hit critical infrastructure 4,800 times in 2024, and China's AI models are only 3-6 months behind according to Trump's AI czar David Sacks, who faces mounting ethics questions over his 400+ tech investments. Washington's answer: build federally-funded AI research centers, pump $70 million into smart manufacturing, and automate everything from threat detection to supply chains—while fighting states over who controls AI regulation and navigating contract terminations that undermine confidence in federal partnerships.

Key Indicators

$280B
CHIPS Act investment (2022-present)
Federal funding for semiconductors, AI research, and manufacturing infrastructure
9.4%
Manufacturing share of US GDP
Down from 15.1% two decades ago, as China dominates production
295,000
Industrial robots China installed in 2024
More than the rest of the world combined; US installed 34,000
500,000
Unfilled US manufacturing jobs
Skills gap in AI, robotics, and digital manufacturing
4,800
Ransomware attacks on US critical infrastructure in 2024
Up 9% from 2023, costing millions in disruptions
3-6 months
China's AI lag behind US
According to Trump AI czar David Sacks—not years
$285M
CHIPS contract terminated
SMART USA Institute funding pulled despite meeting targets
60-65%
Intel 18A chip yields
Fab 52 producing advanced AI chips, targeting 70% by year-end

Interactive

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Sign Up

Debate Arena

Two rounds, two personas, one winner. You set the crossfire.

People Involved

Gina Raimondo
Gina Raimondo
U.S. Secretary of Commerce (2021-2025, Biden Administration) (Led industrial policy during Biden term; championed CHIPS Act implementation)
David Sacks
David Sacks
White House AI and Crypto Czar (Trump Administration) (Leading Trump's AI policy; facing ethics scrutiny over 400+ tech investments)
Laurie Locascio
Laurie Locascio
Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology / NIST Director (Leading NIST's AI centers expansion and Manufacturing USA coordination)

Organizations Involved

National Institute of Standards and Technology
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Federal Research Agency
Status: Primary federal AI research coordinator; facing criticism over SMART USA contract termination

The nation's measurement standards lab, now running America's AI industrial policy.

MITRE Corporation
MITRE Corporation
Federally Funded Research Nonprofit
Status: Operating NIST's two new AI centers; runs National Cybersecurity FFRDC

The defense-focused nonprofit now building AI systems to secure factories and critical infrastructure.

Manufacturing USA
Manufacturing USA
Public-Private Innovation Network
Status: 17 institutes coordinating AI manufacturing research across government, academia, and industry

A network of research hubs where government, universities, and companies build the future of American manufacturing.

Timeline

  1. NIST Launches $20M MITRE AI Centers

    Funding

    Two centers: one for manufacturing automation, one for critical infrastructure cybersecurity defense.

  2. Intel Fab 52 Achieves 18A Production Milestone

    Manufacturing

    Arizona facility reaches 60-65% yields on 2nm AI chips, producing 10,000 wafer starts per week—double TSMC Arizona capacity.

  3. Congress Demands Answers on SMART USA Termination

    Oversight

    House Democrats Lofgren and Stevens demand explanation from NIST, warning termination damages agency's reputation as reliable partner.

  4. Trump Signs National AI Framework Order

    Policy

    EO mandates 'minimally burdensome' AI regulation, further reducing federal oversight.

  5. Trump Creates AI Litigation Task Force to Sue States

    Policy

    Executive order directs DOJ to challenge state AI laws, threatens to withhold broadband funding from states with 'onerous' regulations.

  6. Commerce Terminates $285M SMART USA CHIPS Contract

    Funding

    Federal government abruptly cancels Durham-based AI semiconductor institute despite meeting performance targets, undermining confidence in CHIPS Act partnerships.

  7. White House Unveils America's AI Action Plan

    Strategy

    90+ federal actions across innovation, infrastructure, and China competition; includes data center permitting.

  8. Trump Issues 'Removing Barriers' AI Order

    Policy

    New EO prioritizes AI innovation and deregulation over Biden's risk-mitigation framework.

  9. Trump Revokes Biden AI Executive Order

    Policy

    First day in office, Trump kills EO 14110 safety requirements, signaling deregulation approach.

  10. Commerce Awards $285M for Semiconductor Institute

    Funding

    SMART USA institute in North Carolina will use digital twins for chip manufacturing.

  11. AI Safety Consortium First In-Person Meeting

    Coordination

    290+ members convene at University of Maryland to coordinate AI safety research priorities.

  12. NIST Announces $70M Manufacturing AI Institute

    Funding

    Five-year funding opportunity for AI-focused Manufacturing USA institute on supply chain resilience.

  13. Commerce Launches AI Safety Institute Consortium

    Research

    Raimondo announces AISIC with 290+ members to develop AI safety standards and evaluations.

  14. Biden Issues AI Safety Executive Order

    Policy

    EO 14110 mandates safety testing, cybersecurity protocols, and oversight for high-risk AI models.

  15. Biden Signs CHIPS and Science Act

    Legislation

    $280 billion to rebuild U.S. semiconductor and AI manufacturing capabilities amid China competition.

Scenarios

1

U.S. Automation Surge Closes China Manufacturing Gap by 2030

Discussed by: White House AI Action Plan architects, Manufacturing USA network, industry analysts tracking reshoring trends

Federal AI investments trigger a manufacturing renaissance as automation compensates for labor shortages. The 17 Manufacturing USA institutes plus the new AI centers create standardized AI tooling that small and mid-size manufacturers can adopt cheaply. Real-time threat detection stops ransomware attacks before they disrupt production. The U.S. closes the industrial robot gap with China, installing 150,000+ annually by 2028. Reshoring accelerates as AI-automated U.S. factories match Chinese labor costs. Caveat: requires solving the 500,000-job skills gap through massive workforce retraining.

2

China Dominates AI Manufacturing While U.S. Research Stays in Labs

Discussed by: Critics of U.S. industrial policy fragmentation, RAND researchers on China's whole-of-government AI strategy, skeptics of Trump's deregulation approach

The NIST centers produce impressive research but struggle with commercialization. U.S. manufacturers can't afford to retool or find skilled workers to run AI systems. China's Ministry of Industry achieves its goal of 60%+ manufacturers using AI integration by end of 2025, while U.S. adoption stays under 35%. Trump's deregulation approach sacrifices safety standards, causing high-profile AI failures in critical infrastructure that set back adoption. Meanwhile, China controls semiconductor supply chains and installs 400,000+ robots annually. The U.S. wins the AI research race but loses the implementation war.

3

Ransomware Catastrophe Forces Emergency AI Defense Deployment

Discussed by: DHS Homeland Threat Assessment, CISA ransomware reports, critical infrastructure cybersecurity analysts

A coordinated ransomware campaign—potentially state-sponsored—cripples multiple U.S. utilities and manufacturers simultaneously in 2026 or 2027, causing weeks of disruption and billions in damage. The attack resembles the 2025 incidents where pro-Russia hacktivists hit water systems, but at massive scale. Congress authorizes emergency funding and mandates AI threat detection for all critical infrastructure within 18 months. The MITRE AI centers accelerate from research mode to operational deployment, installing automated defense systems across the electric grid, water systems, and factories. The crisis becomes America's 'Sputnik moment' for AI security, but only after catastrophic damage.

4

U.S.-China AI Manufacturing Détente Through Standards Cooperation

Discussed by: Some international AI governance advocates, analysts noting China's July 2025 emphasis on cooperation at World AI Conference

After several near-miss AI safety incidents in both countries, the U.S. and China establish joint AI manufacturing standards through international bodies. NIST collaborates with Chinese counterparts on safety protocols for AI-controlled factories and critical infrastructure. This reduces the 'race to the bottom' in AI safety while allowing both nations to benefit from shared research. U.S. maintains edge in cutting-edge AI models while China leads in implementation scale. However, national security hawks in Washington resist, arguing standards cooperation gives China access to sensitive technologies.

5

Federal-State AI Regulation Battle Creates Policy Gridlock

Discussed by: State attorneys general, constitutional law experts, tech policy analysts concerned about Trump's December 11 executive order

Trump's AI Litigation Task Force files suits against California, Colorado, and other states with AI regulations, triggering years of constitutional litigation over Commerce Clause and preemption. States counter-sue, arguing no comprehensive federal AI framework exists to preempt state action. Tech companies face regulatory fragmentation as they navigate conflicting requirements while courts deliberate. The standoff delays AI deployment in critical infrastructure and manufacturing as companies await legal clarity. Meanwhile, China advances unified AI standards nationwide without jurisdictional conflicts. Resolution takes 3-5 years through courts, during which U.S. AI policy remains fractured.

Historical Context

Sputnik and the Space Race (1957-1969)

1957-1969

What Happened

The Soviet Union launched Sputnik in 1957, shocking Americans who believed they led in technology. The U.S. responded with massive federal investment: creating NASA, pouring billions into education (National Defense Education Act), and mobilizing universities, defense contractors, and national labs. The effort culminated in the 1969 moon landing.

Outcome

Short Term

U.S. closed satellite gap within two years, launched first communications satellite by 1960.

Long Term

Created lasting infrastructure for technological dominance—NASA, DARPA, federally-funded research universities—that drove innovation for decades.

Why It's Relevant Today

The AI manufacturing push mirrors Sputnik's mobilization: rival leads in key technology, federal funding floods research centers, goal is restoring technological supremacy through coordinated government-industry effort.

Japan's Manufacturing Threat and U.S. Response (1980s-1990s)

1980s-1990s

What Happened

Japan's advanced manufacturing—especially in automobiles and semiconductors—threatened U.S. industrial leadership in the 1980s. Japanese companies like Toyota pioneered lean manufacturing and automation while U.S. factories stagnated. Congress responded with Sematech (1987), a government-industry consortium to revive U.S. chip manufacturing, and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (1988) to help small manufacturers adopt new technologies.

Outcome

Short Term

Sematech helped U.S. semiconductor industry regain competitiveness by mid-1990s through shared R&D.

Long Term

Japan's manufacturing edge faded, but the U.S. didn't restore dominant factory employment—instead shifted to services and offshored production to China.

Why It's Relevant Today

Manufacturing USA institutes directly descend from 1980s programs responding to Japan. The difference: China's manufacturing scale dwarfs Japan's peak, and AI automation may be the last chance to compete without matching China's labor costs.

Post-9/11 Critical Infrastructure Protection (2001-present)

2001-present

What Happened

The 9/11 attacks exposed critical infrastructure vulnerabilities and triggered massive federal investment in homeland security. DHS created the National Infrastructure Protection Plan, designated 16 critical infrastructure sectors, and built information-sharing frameworks between government and private sector. Cybersecurity emerged as the dominant threat as infrastructure went digital.

Outcome

Short Term

Billions invested in physical security, surveillance, and early cyber defenses for utilities, finance, and transportation.

Long Term

Created permanent infrastructure protection bureaucracy, but struggles to keep pace with evolving cyber threats—ransomware attacks on critical infrastructure hit 4,800 in 2024, up 9% from 2023.

Why It's Relevant Today

The MITRE AI center for critical infrastructure cybersecurity represents the latest evolution in post-9/11 protection efforts, now using AI to automate threat detection that humans can't handle at the speed and scale of modern attacks.

24 Sources:
+18
NIST CyberScoop MITRE Corporation The White House Council on Foreign Relations Recorded Future U.S. Congress Wiley Law CSO Online Reshoring Initiative The White House U.S. Department of Commerce arXiv WRAL IEEE Spectrum NPR House Committee on Science, Space and Technology TrendForce CNBC Manufacturing Dive NIST NIST The White House NPR