Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why
The affordability debate: Are things getting cheaper or more expensive?

The affordability debate: Are things getting cheaper or more expensive?

Money Moves
By Newzino Staff |

Time-Based Wage Analysis Challenges Conventional Views on Living Costs

January 27th, 2026: Updated Analysis Shows 20% Abundance Increase

Overview

For decades, economists have argued over whether life is getting more affordable. A new analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2000 to 2025 shows that while the Consumer Price Index rose 92.6%, average hourly wages climbed 131.1%—meaning workers can buy 20% more goods today for the same hours worked. The finding rests on measuring 'time prices': not what things cost in dollars, but how many hours of labor it takes to afford them.

The debate matters because it shapes policy: if traditional inflation measures overstate hardship, calls for intervention may be misplaced. But critics argue time-price analysis obscures crucial details—regional variation, wage inequality, and the fact that healthcare, education, and housing costs have outpaced earnings for millions of Americans. What looks like progress in aggregate may mask stagnation or decline for specific groups.

Key Indicators

131.1%
Wage Growth (2000-2025)
Average hourly earnings increase over 25 years, per BLS data
92.6%
CPI Increase (2000-2025)
Consumer Price Index rise over the same period
16.7%
Time Price Decline
Reduction in work hours needed to purchase a standard basket of goods
57%
Workers Beating Inflation
Share of American workers whose wages outpaced inflation as of mid-2025

Interactive

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Sign Up

Debate Arena

Two rounds, two personas, one winner. You set the crossfire.

People Involved

Mark J. Perry
Mark J. Perry
Economist, American Enterprise Institute Senior Fellow (Creator and annual updater of the 'Chart of the Century')
Gale L. Pooley
Gale L. Pooley
Economist, Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute (Co-developer of time price methodology and Simon Abundance Index)
Marian Tupy
Marian Tupy
Editor of HumanProgress.org, Cato Institute Senior Fellow (Leading proponent of 'superabundance' theory)
William D. Nordhaus
William D. Nordhaus
Economist, 2018 Nobel Laureate (Original academic proponent of time-based price measurement)

Organizations Involved

HumanProgress.org
HumanProgress.org
Research Organization
Status: Primary publisher of time-price analyses

A Cato Institute project that aggregates data on improvements in human welfare across health, wealth, education, and environment.

American Enterprise Institute
American Enterprise Institute
Think Tank
Status: Institutional home of Mark Perry and the Chart of the Century

A center-right think tank in Washington, D.C. focused on government, economics, and foreign policy research.

Bureau of Labor Statistics
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Federal Statistical Agency
Status: Primary data source for wage and price analyses

The principal fact-finding agency for the federal government in labor economics and statistics.

Timeline

  1. Updated Analysis Shows 20% Abundance Increase

    Analysis

    HumanProgress.org releases analysis of 2000-2025 BLS data showing average hourly wages rose 131.1% while Consumer Price Index rose 92.6%, translating to a 16.7% decline in time prices and a 20% increase in the 'abundance multiplier.'

  2. HumanProgress Applies Time Prices to Perry's Chart

    Analysis

    HumanProgress.org publishes analysis applying time-price methodology to Perry's Chart of the Century, finding that most consumer goods became more affordable in terms of work hours required.

  3. Superabundance Book Published

    Publication

    Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley publish 'Superabundance,' arguing that population growth correlates with declining time prices for commodities. The book extends Julian Simon's thesis with decades of new data.

  4. Chart Dubbed 'Chart of the Century'

    Recognition

    Clemson economist Bruce Yandle coins the name 'Chart of the Century' in a Washington Examiner op-ed, cementing the visualization's prominence in economic discourse.

  5. Fed Economists Circulate Perry's Chart

    Recognition

    Bloomberg reports that Federal Reserve economists are sharing Mark Perry's price divergence chart, noting its implications for understanding inflation dynamics across sectors.

  6. Nordhaus Publishes Time-Price Study

    Research

    Yale economist William Nordhaus demonstrates that conventional inflation measures understate improvements in lighting technology by a factor of 1,000. His methodology becomes foundational for later time-price analyses.

  7. Simon Wins the Bet

    Historical

    All five metals Ehrlich chose fell in inflation-adjusted price. Ehrlich mailed Simon a check for $576.07. The outcome bolstered arguments that innovation and market forces can overcome apparent resource constraints.

  8. Simon-Ehrlich Bet Formalized

    Historical

    Economist Julian Simon and biologist Paul Ehrlich wager on whether commodity prices will rise or fall over the next decade. The bet frames the debate over whether human innovation can outpace resource depletion.

Scenarios

1

Time Prices Gain Policy Traction

Discussed by: Cato Institute economists, supply-side policy advocates, some Federal Reserve researchers

If time-price methodology gains acceptance among policymakers, it could reshape debates over minimum wage, inflation targeting, and social safety net programs. Proponents argue current measures overstate economic hardship, suggesting less aggressive intervention is needed. This would require academic consensus on methodology and adoption by statistical agencies—a significant institutional shift.

2

Critics Expose Distributional Blindspots

Discussed by: Economic Policy Institute, labor economists, inequality researchers

Critics increasingly argue that average wage statistics mask severe inequality: while aggregate time prices fell, the bottom 90% of earners saw just 36% wage growth since 1980, compared to 162% for the top 1%. If distributional analyses gain prominence, time-price findings may be reframed as measuring gains that accrued primarily to high earners, limiting their policy relevance.

3

Essential Services Divergence Deepens

Discussed by: Dallas Federal Reserve economists, housing policy analysts, healthcare economists

Healthcare, education, childcare, and housing continue outpacing wage growth for most workers, even as tradeable goods become cheaper. If this divergence accelerates, the time-price framework may be seen as accurate for consumer goods but irrelevant for the categories that dominate household budgets for middle and lower-income families.

4

Measurement Debate Reaches Stalemate

Discussed by: BLS economists, academic statisticians, economic historians

The underlying tension—whether to measure economic progress by aggregate averages or distributional outcomes—remains unresolved. Different methodologies answer different questions, and neither side concedes ground. Public discourse remains split between 'things are getting better' and 'things are getting worse' narratives, with data supporting both depending on framing.

Historical Context

The Simon-Ehrlich Wager (1980-1990)

September 1980 - October 1990

What Happened

Biologist Paul Ehrlich, author of 'The Population Bomb,' bet economist Julian Simon $1,000 that the prices of five metals—copper, chromium, nickel, tin, and tungsten—would rise over the next decade due to population growth and resource depletion. Simon, who argued human ingenuity creates abundance, let Ehrlich choose the commodities.

Outcome

Short Term

All five metals fell in inflation-adjusted price. Ehrlich mailed Simon a check for $576.07 in October 1990.

Long Term

The bet became a touchstone in debates over population, resources, and environmental limits. Simon's 'ultimate resource' thesis—that human innovation overcomes scarcity—became foundational for optimistic economic frameworks including time-price analysis.

Why It's Relevant Today

Time-price proponents explicitly build on Simon's framework, and the Simon Abundance Index is named in his honor. The 1980 bet established the intellectual lineage for arguments that rising populations correlate with falling real prices.

Nordhaus Lighting Study (1994)

1994

What Happened

Yale economist William Nordhaus traced the cost of artificial light from Babylonian oil lamps to modern LEDs, finding that conventional price indices understated the decline in lighting costs by a factor of 1,000. One hour of labor that once produced minutes of light now yields 51 years of illumination.

Outcome

Short Term

The paper became a landmark in economic measurement literature, demonstrating how quality improvements can be systematically missed by standard inflation calculations.

Long Term

Nordhaus received the 2018 Nobel Prize (for climate economics, not this work). His lighting study provided academic legitimacy for measuring prices in time rather than currency.

Why It's Relevant Today

Nordhaus's methodology is the direct intellectual ancestor of modern time-price analysis. His demonstration that conventional measures miss dramatic quality improvements underlies claims that current inflation statistics overstate economic hardship.

Real Wage Stagnation Debate (1973-Present)

1973 - Present

What Happened

The Economic Policy Institute and other labor-focused researchers documented that while productivity rose 80.9% from 1979 to 2024, average hourly compensation increased just 29.4% after inflation. Median wages for non-supervisory workers barely budged in real terms for four decades.

Outcome

Short Term

The data fueled policy debates over minimum wage increases, union protections, and income redistribution throughout the 1990s and 2000s.

Long Term

Wage stagnation became a defining economic narrative, contributing to political movements focused on inequality. The top 1% saw wage growth of 162% over this period while the bottom 90% saw 36%.

Why It's Relevant Today

Time-price optimists and wage-stagnation pessimists interpret the same underlying data differently. The debate over which framing better captures economic reality remains central to policy disputes over affordability and living standards.

12 Sources:
+6
HumanProgress.org American Enterprise Institute Wikipedia Foundation for Economic Education Cato Institute Economic Policy Institute Pew Research Center Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Cowles Foundation, Yale University Visual Capitalist HumanProgress.org Cato Institute