Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
The affordability debate: Are things getting cheaper or more expensive?

The affordability debate: Are things getting cheaper or more expensive?

Money Moves

Time-Based Wage Analysis Challenges Conventional Views on Living Costs

January 27th, 2026: Updated Analysis Shows 20% Abundance Increase

Overview

For decades, economists have argued over whether life is getting more affordable. A new analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data from 2000 to 2025 shows that while the Consumer Price Index rose 92.6%, average hourly wages climbed 131.1%.

Workers can buy 20% more goods today for the same hours worked. The finding rests on measuring 'time prices': not what things cost in dollars, but how many hours of labor it takes to afford them.

The debate matters because it shapes policy: if traditional inflation measures overstate hardship, calls for intervention may be misplaced. But critics argue time-price analysis obscures important details—regional variation, wage inequality, and the fact that healthcare, education, and housing costs have outpaced earnings for millions of Americans. What looks like progress in aggregate may mask stagnation or decline for specific groups.

Key Indicators

131.1%
Wage Growth (2000-2025)
Average hourly earnings increase over 25 years, per BLS data
92.6%
CPI Increase (2000-2025)
Consumer Price Index rise over the same period
16.7%
Time Price Decline
Reduction in work hours needed to purchase a standard basket of goods
57%
Workers Beating Inflation
Share of American workers whose wages outpaced inflation as of mid-2025

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

September 1980 January 2026

8 events Latest: January 27th, 2026 · 4 months ago
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. Updated Analysis Shows 20% Abundance Increase

    Latest Analysis

    HumanProgress.org releases analysis of 2000-2025 BLS data showing average hourly wages rose 131.1% while Consumer Price Index rose 92.6%, translating to a 16.7% decline in time prices and a 20% increase in the 'abundance multiplier.'

  2. HumanProgress Applies Time Prices to Perry's Chart

    Analysis

    HumanProgress.org publishes analysis applying time-price methodology to Perry's Chart of the Century, finding that most consumer goods became more affordable in terms of work hours required.

  3. Superabundance Book Published

    Publication

    Marian Tupy and Gale Pooley publish 'Superabundance,' arguing that population growth correlates with declining time prices for commodities. The book extends Julian Simon's thesis with decades of new data.

  4. Chart Dubbed 'Chart of the Century'

    Recognition

    Clemson economist Bruce Yandle coins the name 'Chart of the Century' in a Washington Examiner op-ed, cementing the visualization's prominence in economic discourse.

  5. Fed Economists Circulate Perry's Chart

    Recognition

    Bloomberg reports that Federal Reserve economists are sharing Mark Perry's price divergence chart, noting its implications for understanding inflation dynamics across sectors.

  6. Nordhaus Publishes Time-Price Study

    Research

    Yale economist William Nordhaus demonstrates that conventional inflation measures understate improvements in lighting technology by a factor of 1,000. His methodology becomes foundational for later time-price analyses.

  7. Simon Wins the Bet

    Historical

    All five metals Ehrlich chose fell in inflation-adjusted price. Ehrlich mailed Simon a check for $576.07. The outcome bolstered arguments that innovation and market forces can overcome apparent resource constraints.

  8. Simon-Ehrlich Bet Formalized

    Historical

    Economist Julian Simon and biologist Paul Ehrlich wager on whether commodity prices will rise or fall over the next decade. The bet frames the debate over whether human innovation can outpace resource depletion.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

September 1980 - October 1990

The Simon-Ehrlich Wager (1980-1990)

Biologist Paul Ehrlich, author of 'The Population Bomb,' bet economist Julian Simon $1,000 that the prices of five metals—copper, chromium, nickel, tin, and tungsten—would rise over the next decade due to population growth and resource depletion. Simon, who argued human ingenuity creates abundance, let Ehrlich choose the commodities.

Then

All five metals fell in inflation-adjusted price. Ehrlich mailed Simon a check for $576.07 in October 1990.

Now

The bet became a touchstone in debates over population, resources, and environmental limits. Simon's 'ultimate resource' thesis—that human innovation overcomes scarcity—became foundational for optimistic economic frameworks including time-price analysis.

Why this matters now

Time-price proponents explicitly build on Simon's framework, and the Simon Abundance Index is named in his honor. The 1980 bet established the intellectual lineage for arguments that rising populations correlate with falling real prices.

1994

Nordhaus Lighting Study (1994)

Yale economist William Nordhaus traced the cost of artificial light from Babylonian oil lamps to modern LEDs, finding that conventional price indices understated the decline in lighting costs by a factor of 1,000. One hour of labor that once produced minutes of light now yields 51 years of illumination.

Then

The paper became a landmark in economic measurement literature, demonstrating how quality improvements can be systematically missed by standard inflation calculations.

Now

Nordhaus received the 2018 Nobel Prize (for climate economics, not this work). His lighting study provided academic legitimacy for measuring prices in time rather than currency.

Why this matters now

Nordhaus's methodology is the direct intellectual ancestor of modern time-price analysis. His demonstration that conventional measures miss dramatic quality improvements underlies claims that current inflation statistics overstate economic hardship.

1973 - Present

Real Wage Stagnation Debate (1973-Present)

The Economic Policy Institute and other labor-focused researchers documented that while productivity rose 80.9% from 1979 to 2024, average hourly compensation increased just 29.4% after inflation. Median wages for non-supervisory workers barely budged in real terms for four decades.

Then

The data fueled policy debates over minimum wage increases, union protections, and income redistribution throughout the 1990s and 2000s.

Now

Wage stagnation became a defining economic narrative, contributing to political movements focused on inequality. The top 1% saw wage growth of 162% over this period while the bottom 90% saw 36%.

Why this matters now

Time-price optimists and wage-stagnation pessimists interpret the same underlying data differently. The debate over which framing better captures economic reality remains central to policy disputes over affordability and living standards.

Sources

(12)