Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following Why Ranks Sign Up
U.S. blocks new foreign drone models in national security crackdown

U.S. blocks new foreign drone models in national security crackdown

Rule Changes

FCC Adds DJI and Foreign-Made Drones to Covered List, Ending New Market Access

December 23rd, 2025: FCC Adds Foreign Drones to Covered List

Overview

For nearly a decade, Chinese drone manufacturer DJI dominated the American skies. The company held 70 to 90 percent of the U.S. drone market—used by hobbyists, farmers, real estate agents, and 90 percent of first responders with drone programs. On December 23, 2025, that dominance hit a wall: the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) added all foreign-made drones and critical components to its Covered List, blocking any new models from receiving the equipment authorization required for U.S. sale.

The action doesn't ground existing drones or revoke prior authorizations. But it freezes the market in place. No new DJI models can enter the country. Retail inventory will deplete. American alternatives cost two to ten times more and lag years behind in capability. For the 460,000 commercial drone operators in the United States, the calculus just changed—and the domestic drone industry has roughly two years to catch up before shelves go bare.

Play on this story Voices Debate Who Said What? Predict

Key Indicators

70-90%
DJI U.S. Market Share
Estimated share of American consumer and commercial drone market held by DJI before the ban
97%
Operators Using DJI
Percentage of surveyed U.S. drone operators who use at least one DJI product
43%
Business-Ending Impact
Share of operators who said the ban would have extremely negative or potentially business-ending effects
5-10x
Price Gap
How much more American-made alternatives typically cost compared to equivalent DJI drones

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Log in Sign Up

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Brendan Carr
Brendan Carr
Led the FCC action adding foreign drones to Covered List
 Frank Wang (Wang Tao)
Frank Wang (Wang Tao)
Leading company response to U.S. restrictions
 Adam Welsh
Adam Welsh
Leading DJI's engagement with U.S. regulators
 Elise Stefanik
Elise Stefanik
Key architect of legislative restrictions on DJI

Organizations Involved

DJI (Da-Jiang Innovations)
DJI (Da-Jiang Innovations)
Private Technology Company
Added to FCC Covered List; new models blocked from U.S. market

Chinese drone manufacturer holding 70-90% of the U.S. consumer and commercial drone market.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
U.S. spectrum regulator
Implementing foreign drone restrictions via Covered List

U.S. agency regulating communications infrastructure, including equipment authorization required for wireless devices sold in America.
Skydio
Skydio
Private Technology Company
Leading American alternative to DJI

U.S.-based drone maker known for AI-driven autonomous flight, focused on enterprise and government markets.

Timeline

August 2017 December 2025

11 events Latest: December 23rd, 2025 · 5 months ago Showing 8 of 11
Tap a bar to jump to that date

  1. FCC Adds Foreign Drones to Covered List

    Latest Regulatory

    The FCC added all foreign-made uncrewed aircraft systems and critical components to its Covered List, blocking new equipment authorizations. DJI and Autel were specifically named as required by the NDAA.

  2. White House Finalizes National Security Determination

    Government Action

    An executive-branch interagency group convened by the White House concluded that foreign-produced drones and components pose "unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States."

  3. DJI Issues Final Plea for Audit

    Corporate

    With weeks remaining before the deadline, DJI sent letters to five national security agencies urging them to begin the mandated security review immediately.

  4. DJI Begins Outreach for Security Audit

    Corporate

    DJI first contacted federal leadership offering to support the congressionally mandated security review and provide internal technical information.

  5. NDAA Signed with Drone Provisions

    Legislative

    President signed the Fiscal Year 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, including Section 1709 requiring a security audit of DJI within one year or automatic placement on the FCC Covered List.

  6. House Passes Countering CCP Drones Act

    Legislative

    The House of Representatives passed the Countering CCP Drones Act with bipartisan support, sending it toward inclusion in the defense authorization bill.

  7. Countering CCP Drones Act Introduced

    Legislative

    Representative Elise Stefanik introduced the Countering CCP Drones Act, which would add DJI to the FCC Covered List and block new equipment authorizations.

  8. DOD Identifies DJI as Chinese Military Company

    Government Action

    The Department of Defense officially identified DJI as a "Chinese military company," adding regulatory pressure but not directly restricting consumer sales.

  9. Treasury Designates DJI as Chinese Military Company

    Government Action

    The Department of the Treasury added DJI to its list of Chinese Military-Industrial Complex companies, prohibiting U.S. investment in the firm.

  10. Commerce Department Adds DJI to Entity List

    Regulatory

    The Department of Commerce added DJI to its Entity List, citing human rights abuses related to surveillance of Uyghurs in Xinjiang. The listing restricted U.S. companies from exporting technology to DJI but did not affect consumer sales.

  11. U.S. Army Bans DJI Drones

    Government Action

    The U.S. Army issued a directive ordering all units to stop using DJI drones, citing cybersecurity vulnerabilities. This marked the first major federal restriction on DJI products.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

May 2019

Huawei 5G Ban (2019)

The Trump administration added Huawei to the Commerce Department Entity List and effectively banned the company from U.S. telecommunications networks, cutting off access to Google services and American chip suppliers. The action extended globally as the U.S. pressured allies to exclude Huawei from 5G infrastructure.

Then

Huawei's smartphone business collapsed outside China, losing access to Google's Android services. The company stockpiled chips before restrictions tightened.

Now

The ban reshaped global telecommunications supply chains. European carriers faced costly Huawei equipment removal. China accelerated domestic semiconductor development. The precedent established a template for technology decoupling.

Why this matters now

The DJI ban follows the same playbook: national security justification, Covered List mechanism, exemption of existing equipment, and pressure on domestic alternatives to fill the gap. The Huawei case shows both the feasibility and the costs of such restrictions.

September 2017 - June 2024

Kaspersky Lab Ban (2017-2024)

The Department of Homeland Security ordered federal agencies to remove Kaspersky antivirus software, citing Russian government ties. In 2024, the Commerce Department issued a final determination prohibiting Kaspersky sales to U.S. consumers entirely.

Then

Federal agencies removed Kaspersky products. The company disputed allegations and offered source code review, similar to DJI's audit requests.

Now

Kaspersky's U.S. market share evaporated. The case demonstrated that security concerns about foreign software companies could evolve from federal restrictions to complete market bans.

Why this matters now

Like DJI, Kaspersky offered transparency measures and independent audits that failed to satisfy U.S. regulators. The progression from federal use ban to consumer ban suggests a possible trajectory for drone restrictions.

1981-1994

Japanese Auto Voluntary Export Restraints (1981)

Facing pressure from U.S. automakers and unions, Japan agreed to voluntary export restraints limiting car shipments to America. At their peak, Japanese automakers held about 22% of the U.S. market, triggering fears of domestic industry collapse.

Then

Japanese automakers raised prices and shifted to higher-margin vehicles. American consumers paid more for cars.

Now

Japanese manufacturers built U.S. factories to circumvent quotas, eventually employing hundreds of thousands of Americans. Detroit automakers failed to use the breathing room to become competitive, and market share continued declining after quotas ended.

Why this matters now

The auto restraints show that protecting domestic industry doesn't guarantee its revival. American drone manufacturers face similar questions: will restricted competition spur innovation or merely raise prices while underlying competitive gaps persist?

Sources

(12)
+6
Federal Communications Commission UAV Coach DRONELIFE Wiley Rein LLP CNN Business DroneDJ Scientific American Rupprecht Law Commercial UAV News TechCrunch Office of Congresswoman Elise Stefanik DRONELIFE