Scott Bessent’s farmland divestiture: ethics clash inside Trump’s Treasury

Overview

Scott Bessent became Treasury Secretary in January 2025. An ethics agreement required him to sell substantial holdings, including up to $25 million in North Dakota soybean and corn farmland that earned as much as $1 million a year in rent. After months of delays, the Office of Government Ethics warned him in August 2025 that he'd failed to comply on time.

On December 7, 2025, Bessent announced he'd finally divested the soybean farm—his most glaring conflict-of-interest obligation. The December divestiture resolved the immediate ethics crisis. But questions remain about whether his policy decisions while still owning the farmland, particularly his role in Trump's tariff strategy and farm rescue measures, created improper conflicts.

Ethics watchdog groups including Campaign Legal Center and Democracy Defenders Fund filed complaints in August 2025 seeking investigations by the Treasury inspector general into whether Bessent violated criminal conflict-of-interest statutes. As of early February 2026, no formal findings or investigations have been publicly announced. Bessent has remained in his Treasury post while continuing to shape U.S. economic policy.

Play on this story Voices Debate Who Said What? Predict

Key Indicators

$25M

Estimated value of Bessent’s North Dakota soybean and corn farmland

Public financial disclosures and media reports put the High Plains Acres LLP holdings between $5 million and $25 million, with about 5,662 acres of cropland.

up to $1M/yr

Annual rental income from the farm

Disclosure forms show the land produced between $100,001 and $1 million annually in rental income tied to crop prices, creating a direct stake in soybean and corn markets.

96%

Portion of assets divested before August 2025

By mid‑2025 Bessent had sold roughly 96% of assets covered by his ethics agreement, leaving a disputed 4%—largely farmland and other illiquid holdings—outstanding.

≈70%

Share of North Dakota soybeans exported to China

Roughly 70% of North Dakota soybeans go to China, meaning Bessent’s farm income was tightly linked to trade talks he helped lead with Beijing.

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play

Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play

Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Scott Bessent

Under sustained ethics scrutiny; has now divested North Dakota farmland but faces questions about earlier decisions

Donald Trump

Relies on Bessent to execute tariffs, farm aid and consumer initiatives; administration faces renewed ethics questions in second term

Dale Christopher

Monitoring Bessent’s adherence to his ethics agreement; warned Senate that he was not in timely compliance

Mike Crapo

Receives OGE letters about Bessent’s noncompliance; potential gatekeeper for any Senate ethics or oversight hearings

Ron Wyden

Leading Democratic critic of Bessent’s delayed divestiture and Trump’s ethics record

Organizations Involved

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Federal Department

Home agency for Bessent; manages internal ethics screening while defending his role in trade and farm policy

The Treasury Department manages federal finances, debt issuance, tax administration and key elements of U.S. economic and sanctions policy.

U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE)

Government Body

Oversight agency monitoring Bessent’s compliance with his ethics agreement

OGE provides overall leadership and oversight of the executive branch ethics program, reviewing financial disclosures and negotiating ethics agreements with senior officials.

U.S. Senate Committee on Finance

Government Body

Primary congressional recipient of OGE warnings; venue for potential hearings

The Senate Finance Committee oversees tax, trade and certain health programs, and plays a central role in vetting Treasury nominees and overseeing Treasury policy.

Trump Administration (Second Term)

US Executive Branch

Sets policy context—trade war, farm aid and consumer programs—within which Bessent’s conflicts emerged

Trump’s second-term administration has prioritized tariffs, deregulation and populist-leaning economic messaging, while facing ongoing questions about conflicts of interest and ethics norms.

High Plains Acres LLP

Corporation

Bessent family landholding company used to own contested North Dakota farmland

High Plains Acres LLP is a limited liability partnership that has owned thousands of acres of cropland across multiple North Dakota counties, used for soybean and corn production.

Campaign Legal Center

Nonprofit

Filed complaint seeking investigation of Bessent’s potential conflict-of-interest violations

Campaign Legal Center (CLC) is a nonpartisan nonprofit focused on campaign finance, ethics and democratic reform.

Democracy Defenders Fund

Political Advocacy Group

Co‑complainant in ethics filings targeting Bessent

A pro‑democracy advocacy organization focused on ethics, transparency and defending democratic norms.

Timeline

November 2024 December 2025

11 events Latest: December 7th, 2025 · 6 months ago Showing 8 of 11

Tap a bar to jump to that date

December 2025
Bessent announces sale of soybean farm on national TV
Latest Public Statement

On CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Bessent reveals he has “just divested” his soybean farm as part of his ethics agreement, saying he is “out of that business.” Reuters confirms the sale as part of his remaining 4% of required divestitures.
December 7th, 2025 • 02:55 PM EST
October 2025
Trump administration prepares new bailout for trade‑hit farmers
Policy Decision

Reuters reports the administration is poised to unveil a multibillion‑dollar aid package for farmers hurt by trade disputes, reinforcing concerns that Bessent’s own soybean holdings could benefit.
October 6th, 2025
August 2025
Banking Dive exposes scope of Bessent’s remaining assets
Media Analysis

A detailed Banking Dive report explains that Bessent has divested about 96% of agreed assets but still holds substantial farmland and some private stakes; OGE grants him until December 15 to finish divesting.
August 14th, 2025
Ethics groups file formal complaint over Bessent’s holdings
Advocacy Action

Campaign Legal Center and Democracy Defenders Fund file a complaint with OGE and the Treasury inspector general, alleging Bessent’s delay raises serious questions about compliance with criminal conflict-of-interest laws.
August 13th, 2025
OGE warns Senate that Bessent missed ethics deadlines
Watchdog Letter

In a letter to Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo, OGE’s Dale Christopher writes that Bessent “has failed to timely comply” with certain ethics‑agreement terms, notably farmland divestitures.
August 11th, 2025
June 2025
Bessent cites illiquid holdings in letter to Treasury ethics officials
Ethics Review

Bessent informs Treasury ethics officials that several private investments are too illiquid to sell; OGE later agrees they no longer pose conflicts, leaving farmland as the central unresolved issue.
June 1st, 2025
May 2025
Agweek reveals family still controls multimillion‑dollar North Dakota farmland
Investigative Report

An Agweek investigation finds that High Plains Acres LLP, tied to Bessent’s family, still owns about 5,662 acres of North Dakota cropland worth an estimated $18 million despite the ethics agreement.
May 15th, 2025
April 2025
Initial divestiture deadline passes without full compliance
Missed Deadline

The 90‑day deadline for Bessent to divest 25 entities expires. By mid‑May, his ethics compliance certification still does not appear on OGE’s public site.
April 28th, 2025
January 2025
Senate confirms Bessent as Treasury Secretary
Confirmation

Bessent is confirmed by the Senate, starting the 90‑day clock for required divestitures under his ethics agreement.
January 27th, 2025
Bessent signs ethics agreement requiring broad divestitures
Ethics Agreement

Ahead of his confirmation, Bessent signs an ethics agreement promising to divest interests in 25 entities—including High Plains Acres LLP farmland—within 90 days of Senate confirmation.
January 9th, 2025
November 2024
Trump selects Scott Bessent as Treasury Secretary
Nomination

President‑elect Trump announces hedge fund manager Scott Bessent as his pick for Treasury Secretary, triggering ethics scrutiny of his sprawling financial holdings.
November 23rd, 2024

#timeline [x-show="expanded"] { display: revert !important; opacity: 1 !important; } #timeline .timeline-toggle-btn { display: none; }

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

2016-12 – 2017-02

Rex Tillerson’s ‘clean break’ from Exxon as Secretary of State

When ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson was nominated as Trump’s first‑term Secretary of State, he struck an agreement—negotiated with OGE—to sever all financial ties with Exxon. More than 2 million restricted Exxon shares were converted into an independently managed trust barred from investing in Exxon, and Tillerson sold his personally held shares, sacrificing about $7 million in compensation to comply with conflict‑of‑interest rules. OGE director Walter Shaub publicly praised this as a “clean break” and a model ethics agreement.

Then

Tillerson entered office with strong ethics marks despite criticism of his Exxon ties, limiting conflict-of-interest attacks even as other concerns about his policies mounted.

Now

He later clashed with Trump on policy grounds and was fired in 2018, but his Exxon divestiture remained a benchmark for how fully Cabinet officials can separate from former employers.

Why this matters now

Tillerson’s case underscores that very wealthy nominees can make substantial financial sacrifices to avoid conflicts and win OGE’s approval. Bessent, by contrast, negotiated extensions and divested farmland only months after his deadline, inviting comparison to a Cabinet colleague who made a quicker and more complete break from his core business interests.

2017–2018

Wilbur Ross’s incomplete divestitures and shipping conflicts as Commerce Secretary

Wilbur Ross, Trump’s first‑term Commerce Secretary, pledged to divest a complex web of holdings but later was found to have retained stakes in companies co‑owned by the Chinese government, a shipping firm tied to Vladimir Putin’s circle and a Cypriot bank implicated in Mueller‑era investigations. Reporters and watchdogs argued he had not fully divested as promised, and OGE at one point declared him “not in compliance” with his ethics agreement.

Then

Ross weathered the storm and remained in office, but carried a reputation as an ethics risk; his case fed criticism that Trump Cabinet members faced limited consequences for conflicts.

Now

The episode contributed to a broader push for stronger transparency and conflict rules, and is now used as a cautionary example of how delayed or partial divestitures can undercut public trust without necessarily forcing resignations.

Why this matters now

Ross’s trajectory offers a sobering precedent for the Bessent saga: a Cabinet official can remain in place despite being found out of compliance, with the main costs being reputational rather than legal. It suggests Bessent might survive politically even if watchdogs conclude his farmland divestiture came late.

2020–2022

Federal Reserve trading scandals and tightened ethics rules

A series of revelations showed several Federal Reserve officials, including regional bank presidents and senior leaders, had traded individual stocks and other securities around the time of major Fed decisions. After investigations and public backlash, the Fed adopted new rules barring senior officials from owning individual stocks, certain bonds or derivatives and restricting trading windows, significantly tightening ethics expectations in monetary policy circles.

Then

Several officials resigned or faced internal discipline, and the Fed moved swiftly to implement more stringent ethics rules to restore credibility.

Now

The Fed’s actions are now cited as evidence that powerful economic institutions can and should impose strict limits on personal financial activity to avoid conflicts and perceptions of self‑dealing.

Why this matters now

The Fed scandals show that ethics controversies in economic policymaking can drive structural reform, not just individual embarrassment. Bessent’s farmland case could similarly catalyze tougher rules for Cabinet‑level officials who sit at the intersection of markets and policy, particularly across trade, agriculture and finance.