For nearly three years after Russia's 2022 invasion, Ukraine relied on American satellites and signals intelligence for roughly 75-80% of its battlefield awareness. In ten months, France claims to have replaced most of that. President Macron announced on January 15, 2026, that France now provides two-thirds of Ukraine's intelligence—a restructuring forced by Washington's March 2025 decision to suspend most intelligence sharing as leverage in peace negotiations.
The shift represents the most significant realignment of Western security architecture since the Cold War. European NATO members, led by France and the UK, have built parallel intelligence pipelines, established joint military commands, and assembled a 34-nation coalition to backstop Ukraine's defense. Whether European capabilities can truly substitute for American satellites and early-warning systems—which Ukraine's former intelligence chief called 'critical' dependencies—remains the central question.
Images from Openverse under Creative Commons licenses.
Videos from YouTube.
Key Indicators
~67%
French intelligence share
Portion of Ukraine's intelligence now supplied by France, per Macron
34
Coalition nations
Countries in the Coalition of the Willing providing Ukraine support
€40B
2025 military commitment
European military support pledged to Ukraine for 2025
15
French military satellites
France operates 15 of Europe's ~50 military satellites
People Involved
Emmanuel Macron
President of France (Leading European security response to US retrenchment)
Volodymyr Zelenskyy
President of Ukraine (Negotiating peace framework while managing shifted Western support)
Kyrylo Budanov
Head of Office of the President (formerly Military Intelligence Chief) (Appointed chief of staff January 2026)
Donald Trump
President of the United States (Pursuing bilateral peace deal with Russia)
Keir Starmer
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (Co-leading Coalition of the Willing with Macron)
Organizations Involved
CO
Coalition of the Willing
International Security Coalition
Status: Active - 34 member nations
European-led coalition providing military, financial, and intelligence support to Ukraine following reduced US involvement.
DG
DGSE (Direction générale de la sécurité extérieure)
Intelligence Agency
Status: Primary European intelligence provider to Ukraine
France's external intelligence agency, now providing the bulk of European intelligence support to Ukraine.
FI
Five Eyes Alliance
Intelligence Alliance
Status: Strained by US restrictions on Ukraine-related sharing
Longstanding intelligence-sharing alliance of the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
Timeline
Macron: France Provides Two-Thirds of Ukraine Intelligence
Statement
French president announces France now supplies approximately two-thirds of Ukraine's intelligence, claiming to have largely replaced US capabilities suspended in March 2025.
Paris Declaration on Security Guarantees
Diplomatic
Coalition of the Willing leaders sign framework for post-ceasefire security guarantees including troop deployments and military hubs in Ukraine.
Budanov Appointed Chief of Staff
Political
Zelensky names former military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov to lead the Office of the President, replacing Andriy Yermak.
Budanov Warns of US Intelligence Dependence
Statement
Ukraine's intelligence chief publicly states Kyiv remains critically dependent on US satellite imagery and ballistic missile early warning systems.
Trump Hosts Putin in Alaska
Diplomatic
First meeting between a US president and Putin on Western soil since the invasion. Zelensky not invited.
US Blocks Five Eyes from Ukraine Talks Intel
Intelligence
DNI Gabbard signs directive classifying all Russia-Ukraine negotiation intelligence as NOFORN, barring sharing with Five Eyes allies.
First Direct Ukraine-Russia Talks in 3 Years
Diplomatic
Ukrainian and Russian officials meet directly for the first time since 2022. No breakthrough achieved.
Ukraine Accepts Ceasefire Proposal
Diplomatic
Zelensky agrees to 30-day interim ceasefire proposal. US resumes intelligence sharing and security assistance. Russia rejects the ceasefire.
France Confirms Intel Sharing
Intelligence
French defense minister publicly confirms France is sharing intelligence with Ukraine following US suspension.
US Suspends Intelligence Sharing
Intelligence
Trump administration halts most intelligence sharing with Ukraine, including satellite imagery and targeting data. Only force-protection intelligence continues.
Coalition of the Willing Launched
Diplomatic
UK and France announce European-led coalition to provide security guarantees to Ukraine at London Summit. Sixteen world leaders attend.
Oval Office Confrontation
Diplomatic
Meeting between Trump, Vance, and Zelensky devolves into televised shouting match. Ukraine delegation asked to leave early. Trump threatens to withdraw all US support.
France Signs Ukraine Satellite Analysis Contract
Intelligence
Safran.AI contracted to provide Ukraine's military intelligence with a platform for analyzing French CSO-3 satellite imagery—anticipating US intelligence cutoff.
Trump Inaugurated
Political
Donald Trump begins second term. His administration signals intent to broker Ukraine-Russia peace deal within 100 days.
France Launches CSO-3 Spy Satellite
Capability
Third satellite in France's CSO constellation enters orbit, enabling twice-daily coverage of target areas. France now operates 15 of Europe's approximately 50 military satellites.
Russia Invades Ukraine
Military
Full-scale Russian invasion begins. US and allies rapidly expand intelligence sharing with Kyiv, with American satellites and signals intelligence forming the backbone of Ukraine's situational awareness.
Scenarios
1
European Intelligence Proves Sufficient, Peace Deal Holds
Discussed by: French government officials, European defense analysts at IISS
European capabilities—French satellites, UK signals intelligence, and commercial partnerships—adequately replace US support. A peace deal solidifies in early 2026 with Coalition of the Willing forces deployed as monitors. European defense autonomy becomes reality rather than aspiration. This scenario depends on Russia accepting ceasefire terms and France's intelligence claims proving accurate.
2
Intelligence Gap Leads to Ukrainian Military Setbacks
Discussed by: Former US intelligence officials, Ukrainian military sources cited by TIME
Budanov's warnings prove prescient: European satellites cannot match US coverage, and ballistic missile early warning gaps cause casualties. Russian advances accelerate in specific sectors where intelligence degradation is most acute. Pressure mounts on US to resume full sharing, creating leverage for either Ukraine or Russia depending on political context.
3
US Resumes Full Support After Political Shift
Discussed by: Congressional Democrats, Atlantic Council analysts
Domestic political pressure or strategic recalculation leads US to restore full intelligence sharing. The European infrastructure built during 2025 becomes supplementary rather than primary, but the capability exists as insurance against future US policy shifts. Five Eyes restrictions on Ukraine negotiation intelligence may persist.
4
Permanent European-American Intelligence Division
Discussed by: European defense strategists, GLOBSEC
The current arrangement calcifies into a new baseline. France leads European intelligence support to Ukraine while the US maintains separate negotiation channels with Russia. NATO intelligence sharing bifurcates by subject area—China cooperation continues while Russia policy diverges. This represents the most significant structural change to the Western alliance since its founding.
Historical Context
Suez Crisis (1956)
October-November 1956
What Happened
Britain and France, coordinating secretly with Israel, invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal—deliberately cutting Washington out of the planning. The Eisenhower administration, learning of the conspiracy through NSA intercepts, forced a humiliating withdrawal by threatening Britain's currency.
Outcome
Short Term
Britain and France withdrew. Prime Minister Anthony Eden resigned. The operation's failure demonstrated European powers could no longer act independently of American approval.
Long Term
France drew the opposite lesson from Britain: Charles de Gaulle concluded France could not rely on allies and pursued strategic autonomy, including an independent nuclear deterrent. This divergence echoes today.
Why It's Relevant Today
Suez established that major Western military operations required American support. Macron's intelligence announcement implicitly argues the reverse may now be possible—European powers can sustain Ukraine without American participation.
Post-WWII Intelligence Architecture (1946-1956)
1946-1956
What Happened
The US and UK formalized wartime signals intelligence cooperation through the UKUSA Agreement, later expanding to include Canada, Australia, and New Zealand as Five Eyes. The US provided roughly 75-80% of the alliance's intelligence product. European NATO members remained dependent on American collection capabilities.
Outcome
Short Term
Five Eyes became the world's most significant intelligence alliance, with unprecedented information sharing among English-speaking democracies.
Long Term
The arrangement created structural dependency: European NATO members invested less in sovereign intelligence capabilities, assuming American support would always be available.
Why It's Relevant Today
The current shift represents the first major test of whether European intelligence can operate independently at scale. France's position outside Five Eyes—ironically limiting UK support due to NOFORN restrictions—enables it to fill the gap.
US Pre-Invasion Intelligence Disclosure (2022)
January-February 2022
What Happened
In an unprecedented move, the Biden administration declassified and publicly shared intelligence showing Russian invasion preparations. Information flowed across the Atlantic to NATO partners, exposing Moscow's plans before they materialized.
Outcome
Short Term
The disclosure built international consensus, enabled early weapons shipments to Ukraine, and denied Russia the element of strategic surprise.
Long Term
It established a model of proactive intelligence sharing for alliance coordination—the opposite of current US policy restricting Five Eyes access to negotiation intelligence.
Why It's Relevant Today
The contrast between 2022's unprecedented sharing and 2025's NOFORN restrictions on allies illustrates how rapidly intelligence relationships can shift based on political priorities.
