Pull to refresh
Logo
Daily Brief
Following
Why Ranks Sign Up
Four decades of tracking human happiness

Four decades of tracking human happiness

New Capabilities

The World Values Survey's 40-year effort to measure whether humanity is getting happier—and why economists still disagree

March 20th, 2024: US Falls Out of Top 20 Happiest Countries

Overview

Since 1981, the World Values Survey has asked people in over 100 countries a simple question: Are you happy? Happiness rose in 45 of 52 countries across six survey waves from 1981 to 2007, with the steepest gains in India, Ireland, Mexico, Puerto Rico, and South Korea.

But the finding remains contested. The Easterlin paradox has sparked a 50-year debate: richer people are happier, yet richer countries don't get happier over time. Recent data adds a complication: since roughly 2013, happiness among young people has collapsed in wealthy nations, erasing the gains of earlier decades.

Key Indicators

45 of 52
Countries with rising happiness
Countries showing increased happiness in WVS data from 1981-2007
7 points
Average increase in 'very happy'
Percentage point rise in respondents reporting they were 'very happy' across surveyed nations
100+
Countries surveyed
Nations included in the World Values Survey, covering 90% of world population
62nd
US youth happiness rank
American under-30s rank 62nd out of 143 countries in 2024, while over-60s rank 10th

Voices

Curated perspectives — historical figures and your fellow readers.

Ever wondered what historical figures would say about today's headlines?

Sign up to generate historical perspectives on this story.

Play

Exploring all sides of a story is often best achieved with Play.

Log in to play. Track your picks, climb the leaderboards. Log in Sign Up
Predict 4 ways this could play out. Contrarian picks score more — points lock when the scenario resolves. Log in to play
Timeline Five events from this story — drag them oldest to newest. Log in to play
Connections Sixteen names from the news. Find the four hidden groups of four. Log in to play

People Involved

Organizations Involved

Timeline

January 1972 March 2024

13 events Latest: March 20th, 2024 · 2 years ago Showing 8 of 13
Tap a bar to jump to that date
  1. US Falls Out of Top 20 Happiest Countries

    Latest Research

    The World Happiness Report shows the US dropping to 23rd place, driven by collapsed wellbeing among under-30s, who rank 62nd globally while American over-60s rank 10th.

  2. World Values Survey Findings Show 40-Year Happiness Rise

    Research

    Analysis of six WVS waves (1981-2022) confirms self-reported happiness has risen globally as countries became freer and richer, with economic development, democratization, and social tolerance driving gains.

  3. WVS Wave 7 Completes

    Research

    The seventh wave of the World Values Survey closes after surveying 64 countries and over 80,000 respondents—delayed one year by COVID-19.

  4. Ronald Inglehart Dies at 86

    Milestone

    The founder of the World Values Survey dies after directing the project for four decades and authoring over 400 peer-reviewed articles.

  5. Inglehart Named Most-Cited Political Scientist

    Recognition

    Ronald Inglehart is named the most-cited scholar in political science; his book Cultural Evolution synthesizes 40 years of WVS findings linking freedom, tolerance, and happiness.

  6. First World Happiness Report Published

    Research

    The inaugural World Happiness Report is released, establishing annual country rankings based on Gallup polling data.

  7. UN Adopts Happiness Resolution

    Policy

    The UN General Assembly adopts 'Happiness: towards a holistic approach to development,' recognizing that GDP does not adequately reflect human wellbeing.

  8. University of Michigan Study: 45 of 52 Countries Getting Happier

    Research

    Ronald Inglehart publishes findings that happiness rose in 45 of 52 countries with long-term WVS data (1981-2007), with India, Ireland, Mexico, and South Korea showing steepest gains.

  9. Bhutan Constitutionalizes GNH

    Policy

    Bhutan's new constitution mandates the pursuit of Gross National Happiness as a government responsibility, institutionalizing the first alternative to GDP.

  10. Stevenson and Wolfers Challenge Easterlin Paradox

    Research

    Economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers publish research finding a clear positive link between GDP and happiness, with no satiation point—contradicting the Easterlin paradox.

  11. World Values Survey Launches

    Research

    Ronald Inglehart founds the World Values Survey, beginning systematic cross-national measurement of subjective wellbeing across 22 countries.

  12. Easterlin Publishes Income-Happiness Paradox

    Research

    Richard Easterlin's paper 'Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot?' identifies the paradox that richer individuals are happier, but economic growth doesn't raise national happiness over time.

  13. Bhutan Coins 'Gross National Happiness'

    Conceptual

    King Jigme Singye Wangchuck declares that 'Gross National Happiness is more important than Gross Domestic Product,' establishing an alternative framework for measuring national progress.

Historical Context

3 moments from history that rhyme with this story — and how they unfolded.

1972-present

Bhutan's Gross National Happiness Experiment (1972-present)

Bhutan's King Jigme Singye Wangchuck declared that Gross National Happiness mattered more than GDP, making the Himalayan kingdom the first nation to formally prioritize wellbeing over economic output. The country developed a 33-indicator GNH Index covering psychological wellbeing, health, education, governance, ecology, and living standards.

Then

Bhutan remained one of the world's poorest countries while developing its alternative measurement framework, drawing skepticism from economists.

Now

The concept influenced the UN's 2011 happiness resolution and inspired the World Happiness Report. By 2023, Bhutan's GNH Index reached 0.781—but research found weak correlation between GNH and GDP, with 41% of the richest Bhutanese still 'not-yet-happy.'

Why this matters now

Bhutan's experiment provided the conceptual foundation for treating happiness as a measurable policy outcome, directly influencing how the WVS findings are now applied to governance.

1965

Cantril's Self-Anchoring Scale (1965)

Princeton researcher Hadley Cantril developed the 'Cantril Ladder'—a 0-10 scale asking respondents to rate their lives from worst to best possible. Working with Lloyd Free through the Institute for International Social Research, he collected cross-national happiness data decades before the WVS.

Then

The Cantril Ladder became the standard instrument for measuring life satisfaction, enabling systematic cross-country comparison.

Now

The scale remains the primary metric used by the Gallup World Poll and the World Happiness Report, directly enabling the research that the WVS and later studies built upon.

Why this matters now

The measurement tools developed by Cantril made the WVS's 40-year tracking project technically possible. Without standardized scales, comparing happiness across time and cultures would be impossible.

1930s

The Great Depression and Happiness Measurement Origins (1930s)

As behaviorist psychology dominated academia, researchers began using self-ratings of happiness as early as 1930 to study what factors—marriage, education, work—correlated with wellbeing. This empirical approach emerged alongside growing doubts about whether economic metrics alone captured human flourishing.

Then

Early happiness research established that self-reported wellbeing could be studied scientifically, though behaviorism limited theoretical development.

Now

These methods laid groundwork for mid-century advances by Maslow, Bradburn, and eventually Easterlin's 1974 breakthrough linking economics and happiness measurement.

Why this matters now

The 1930s research established that subjective happiness could be measured—a prerequisite for the WVS's entire enterprise. The same economic crisis that prompted GDP's invention also sparked interest in what GDP couldn't capture.

Sources

(12)